ADVERTISEMENT

Branstad administration reviewing Planned Parenthood contracts

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,664
63,091
113
Getting in on the witch hunt a little late:

Gov. Terry Branstad said Monday his administration is reviewing grant money being paid to Planned Parenthood to consider options going forward. The organization has come under fire due to a series of undercover videos purportedly showing officials from the group discussing the sale fetal tissue.

Faced with growing pressure from conservative Christian organizations to “defund” Planned Parenthood, the governor told reporters Monday that no state money goes for funding abortions in Iowa and most of the reimbursement money paid to the organization for family-planning and other services comes from federal sources.

“We’re going to look at the contracts to see what our rights and responsibilities are,” Branstad told his weekly news conference, adding “there is not a line item in the state budget for Planned Parenthood.”

The Iowa review comes at a time when anti-abortion and conservative groups are calling on Branstad to take steps similar to Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal to stop all state funding to Planned Parenthood. In the past, attempts by states to cut off Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood have been successfully challenged in court.

Planned Parenthood has increasingly become the target of defunding efforts and criticism in the aftermath of the release of surreptitiously recorded videos that critics say show Planned Parenthood officials callously and illegally arranging the sale of fetal parts for profit.

Planned Parenthood says it does not profit from the transfer of fetal tissue, which is used in research, and accuses the group releasing deceptively edited versions of the videos. The organization says it recovers only its costs, which is legal.

Conservative groups like The Family Leader have called on Branstad also to launch an investigation and to be willing to prosecute Planned Parenthood officials in Iowa if any wrongdoing is uncovered. The governor said any probe of possible criminal wrongdoing would have to be conducted by the Iowa Attorney General’s Office, but he noted none of the videos — which he called “outrageous and inappropriate” — that have surfaced originated in Iowa.

Polly Carver-Kimm, communications director for the Iowa Department of Public Health, said the health agency provides no contracted dollars to Planned Parenthood for family planning or non-abortion related health services.

A March 2014 memorandum from the state Department of Human Services to the Legislative Services Agency identified several Planned Parenthood agencies in Iowa as enrolled Medicaid providers that were reimbursed for clinical services topping $5.5 million in fiscal 2012 and $6.3 million in fiscal 2013. The reimbursements for provider services through the Iowa Medicaid Enterprise included exams, prenatal care, birth control pills, sterilizations and pregnancy prevention education programs.

DHS spokeswoman Amy Lorentzen McCoy said the payments were fees for service billings that would be reimbursements, not contracted services.

“The governor’s office has been in contact with DHS to confirm that no Medicaid funds are going to abortion-related procedures at Planned Parenthood,” she added.

“Planned Parenthood of the Heartland has been providing health care and education in Iowa for more than 80 years.” according to a statement issued Monday by Angie Remington, public relations manager for Planned Parenthood of the Heartland. “We play a significant role in the community health network, providing high-quality and affordable care to nearly 38,000 women and men in Iowa each year.

“In addition, we are the pre-eminent provider of health and sexual health education programs in Iowa and each year we reach nearly 44,000 women, men and young people through more than 2,500 programs in schools, community health centers, correctional facilities, at health fairs and at other community outreach events,” Remington added.

“As Gov. Branstad reviews the contracts that fund these programs, we certainly hope he also will carefully consider the impact that these programs have had on reducing rates of unintended pregnancy and sexually-transmitted infections in Iowa, as well as increasing access to family planning services like well-woman exams and contraception.”

http://thegazette.com/branstad-administration-reviewing-planned-parenthood-contracts-20150817
 
Getting in on the witch hunt a little late:

Gov. Terry Branstad said Monday his administration is reviewing grant money being paid to Planned Parenthood to consider options going forward. The organization has come under fire due to a series of undercover videos purportedly showing officials from the group discussing the sale fetal tissue.

Faced with growing pressure from conservative Christian organizations to “defund” Planned Parenthood, the governor told reporters Monday that no state money goes for funding abortions in Iowa and most of the reimbursement money paid to the organization for family-planning and other services comes from federal sources.

“We’re going to look at the contracts to see what our rights and responsibilities are,” Branstad told his weekly news conference, adding “there is not a line item in the state budget for Planned Parenthood.”

The Iowa review comes at a time when anti-abortion and conservative groups are calling on Branstad to take steps similar to Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal to stop all state funding to Planned Parenthood. In the past, attempts by states to cut off Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood have been successfully challenged in court.

Planned Parenthood has increasingly become the target of defunding efforts and criticism in the aftermath of the release of surreptitiously recorded videos that critics say show Planned Parenthood officials callously and illegally arranging the sale of fetal parts for profit.

Planned Parenthood says it does not profit from the transfer of fetal tissue, which is used in research, and accuses the group releasing deceptively edited versions of the videos. The organization says it recovers only its costs, which is legal.

Conservative groups like The Family Leader have called on Branstad also to launch an investigation and to be willing to prosecute Planned Parenthood officials in Iowa if any wrongdoing is uncovered. The governor said any probe of possible criminal wrongdoing would have to be conducted by the Iowa Attorney General’s Office, but he noted none of the videos — which he called “outrageous and inappropriate” — that have surfaced originated in Iowa.

Polly Carver-Kimm, communications director for the Iowa Department of Public Health, said the health agency provides no contracted dollars to Planned Parenthood for family planning or non-abortion related health services.

A March 2014 memorandum from the state Department of Human Services to the Legislative Services Agency identified several Planned Parenthood agencies in Iowa as enrolled Medicaid providers that were reimbursed for clinical services topping $5.5 million in fiscal 2012 and $6.3 million in fiscal 2013. The reimbursements for provider services through the Iowa Medicaid Enterprise included exams, prenatal care, birth control pills, sterilizations and pregnancy prevention education programs.

DHS spokeswoman Amy Lorentzen McCoy said the payments were fees for service billings that would be reimbursements, not contracted services.

“The governor’s office has been in contact with DHS to confirm that no Medicaid funds are going to abortion-related procedures at Planned Parenthood,” she added.

“Planned Parenthood of the Heartland has been providing health care and education in Iowa for more than 80 years.” according to a statement issued Monday by Angie Remington, public relations manager for Planned Parenthood of the Heartland. “We play a significant role in the community health network, providing high-quality and affordable care to nearly 38,000 women and men in Iowa each year.

“In addition, we are the pre-eminent provider of health and sexual health education programs in Iowa and each year we reach nearly 44,000 women, men and young people through more than 2,500 programs in schools, community health centers, correctional facilities, at health fairs and at other community outreach events,” Remington added.

“As Gov. Branstad reviews the contracts that fund these programs, we certainly hope he also will carefully consider the impact that these programs have had on reducing rates of unintended pregnancy and sexually-transmitted infections in Iowa, as well as increasing access to family planning services like well-woman exams and contraception.”

http://thegazette.com/branstad-administration-reviewing-planned-parenthood-contracts-20150817


Yea, terry the twink's heart isn't really in this. Just responding to the staged outrage of winger groups.
 
I'm shocked it took Teflon this long to make this pronouncement. He must have been on vacation or something. He's been looking for an excuse to do this since he became governator. Facts be damned inj his making such a decision....facts have never stopped Teflon from being what he is.
It would work really well for him if PP is funded through MedicAid...because he has already cut MedicAid's service budget by atleast 10% with "managed care."
 
I hope he just goes after them for Anti-trust.

That is the angle of the planned parenthood monopoly that is not getting enough attention.
 
Can you explain further?

They have the market cornered on Family Planning, Counseling, Abortions.

The government is picking winners by subsidizing them into the monopoly they are. They have been deemed "to big to fail". If the demand for these services are out there, and they indeed are, why does one entity get preferential treatment?
 
They have the market cornered on Family Planning, Counseling, Abortions.

The government is picking winners by subsidizing them into the monopoly they are. They have been deemed "to big to fail". If the demand for these services are out there, and they indeed are, why does one entity get preferential treatment?
What percent of the market do they have? And does taking medicaid count as the govt subsidizing them? I think if some got their way and cutoff medicaid to PP, that would be govt picking winners and losers.
 
What percent of the market do they have? And does taking medicaid count as the govt subsidizing them? I think if some got their way and cutoff medicaid to PP, that would be govt picking winners and losers.

Planned Parenthood affiliates’ reported revenue from taxpayer dollars has increased from $272.7 million in its 2004-2005 fiscal year to an average of $536.6 million in each one of the past four years. According to PPFA’s most recently released annual report, 41 percent of Planned Parenthood’s $1.3 billion in revenue was at taxpayers’ expense.

With taxpayer dollars heavily subsidizing its operations, and with its tax-exempt status providing an additional competitive edge, Planned Parenthood is building towards an abortion monopoly. In 2004, Planned Parenthood clinics performed one out of every five abortions in the U.S. By 2011, the latest year for which national data is available, Planned Parenthood performed nearly one out of every three.

http://washingtonweeklynews.com/planned-parenthood-plans-for-bigger-abortion-future/
 
Planned Parenthood affiliates’ reported revenue from taxpayer dollars has increased from $272.7 million in its 2004-2005 fiscal year to an average of $536.6 million in each one of the past four years. According to PPFA’s most recently released annual report, 41 percent of Planned Parenthood’s $1.3 billion in revenue was at taxpayers’ expense.

With taxpayer dollars heavily subsidizing its operations, and with its tax-exempt status providing an additional competitive edge, Planned Parenthood is building towards an abortion monopoly. In 2004, Planned Parenthood clinics performed one out of every five abortions in the U.S. By 2011, the latest year for which national data is available, Planned Parenthood performed nearly one out of every three.

http://washingtonweeklynews.com/planned-parenthood-plans-for-bigger-abortion-future/
Most of that $536 million is medicaid. And is 1/3 really considered a monopoly? So are you really advocating we get more abortion clinics? I don't think most the GOP would be down with that.
 
Most of that $536 million is medicaid. And is 1/3 really considered a monopoly? So are you really advocating we get more abortion clinics? I don't think most the GOP would be down with that.

Private abortion clinics? Sure.

Why do they have a tax exempt status?

Yes 1/3rd is a monopoly when the government is propping you up. Are you telling me you are against Net Neutrality?
 
Private abortion clinics? Sure.

Why do they have a tax exempt status?

Yes 1/3rd is a monopoly. Are you telling me you are against Net Neutrality?
Is PP doing something to prevent these private abortion clinics? It does seem ironic that republicans have made an effort to shutdown abortion clinics and are now complaining that there aren't enough abortion clinics (assuming there are more that just you complaining about the PP monopoly.)

Just some quick googling and from what I can tell you need over 75% to be conisered a monopoly.

http://business-law.freeadvice.com/business-law/trade_regulation/monopoly_power.htm
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Sherman+Anti-Trust+Act

I am for net neutrality.
 
They have the market cornered on Family Planning, Counseling, Abortions.

The government is picking winners by subsidizing them into the monopoly they are. They have been deemed "to big to fail". If the demand for these services are out there, and they indeed are, why does one entity get preferential treatment?
Jeeebus 22....PP may be the "biggest" provider of services you mentioned but I bet they don't have anything close to a monopoly on these services nationwide. Schools, hospitals, neighborhood clinics, private businesses (small and large) all provide access to these services for their people/students/clients.
 
At least his is a somewhat novel, logical complaint. Not just one rooted in "abortions=bad." Keep working on it 22.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22*43*51
Just another example of the greatness that is known as Terry Branstad aka "The Man of Steel".

Tough Terry is known for standing up for the rights of those who are too weak to do it for themselves.

Proud, damn proud to call this man our leader!
 
Just another example of the greatness that is known as Terry Branstad aka "The Man of Steel".

Tough Terry is known for standing up for the rights of those who are too weak to do it for themselves.

Proud, damn proud to call this man our leader!
Sure...just ask the chronically ill, the mentally deficient and the poors........Teflon has their back all the way. Why should he...they can't contribute to his political campaigns.
 
Sure...just ask the chronically ill, the mentally deficient and the poors........Teflon has their back all the way. Why should he...they can't contribute to his political campaigns.
Sounds like the crowd Clinton hangs with rich, smelly and wanting a favor or ten.
 
If Iowa had a Mt. Rushmore type memorial who besides Terry Branstad would be on it? Probably a better question to ask is who other than Terry even deserves to be on it?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT