No.Is any one else feel the way I do when I say that I would rather stick with the running backs we are using now instead of canzeri?
Is any one else feel the way I do when I say that I would rather stick with the running backs we are using now instead of canzeri?
Is any one else feel the way I do when I say that I would rather stick with the running backs we are using now instead of canzeri?
Wadley is the best option...not even close..matter of fact Wadley does not get enough carriesNeed him back, for sure, but I honestly don't think Canzeri houses the run Wadley made yesterday. That cut to the outside was so quick, you almost forget that it was also pretty special.
Tough call for the coaches.
Uhhhh....Canzeri rushed for over 240 yards against Illinois this season. Yeah he sucks.
If you are saying that in response to me then you suck. I never criticized Canzeri. I would just rather have a big play back like Wadley taking most of the carries
Mitchell ain't too shabby...Canzeri has the edge with his receiving ability. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
I think Canzeri was every bit as powerful on short yardage as Daniels has been. And I think Daniels is doing OK. Canzeri is a multi-threat back, the only one we have really.I'm happy we have multiple options at RB, Wadley is more the big play guy, Canzeri is our best all around back, and Daniels is our power back we can use to get those short yards and pound a defense late in the game.
Our offense has been good this year, but just imagine if Duzey and Smith could have been healthy all year and jerminic smith could develop a tad more we could be a very good offense.