ADVERTISEMENT

CBS' Clark Kellogg: Iowa will advance to Sweet 16

Franisdaman

HB King
Nov 3, 2012
101,071
138,063
113
Heaven, Iowa
Early in CBS’ way-too-long two-hour broadcast to unveil the NCAA Tournament bracket, Iowa’s name popped onto the screen.

A few moments later, Iowa coach Fran McCaffery and the rest of the basketball-watching nation heard network analyst Clark Kellogg confidently pick the seventh-seeded Hawkeyes to advance to the Sweet 16. Iowa has not made a Sweet 16 appearance in 17 years (Dr Tom Davis' last year as head coach).

“I think (Kellogg)’s one of the best in the business for what he does. Been that way for many, many years,” McCaffery said Sunday night after watching the announcement with his players at Carver-Hawkeye Arena. “Gotten to know him. I just appreciate his professionalism. He wouldn’t have said it if he didn’t believe it.”

Underdog seeds have made deep runs before. In the last six NCAA Tournaments, a total of 29 teams seeded sixth or below advanced to the Sweet 16. Five did it last year, including two No. 7 seeds — one of them, Michigan State, got to the Final Four.

Two years ago, seventh-seeded Connecticut won a national title. In 2012, No. 7 Florida made the Elite Eight.

As rough as the Hawkeyes’ last 3½ weeks have been, there’s a lot to like about their side of the bracket. As a No. 7 seed, they drew by far the lowest-rated 10 seed in Temple. The Owls, who rank 315th nationally in field-goal percentage, have a KenPom.com overall rating of No. 86 nationally, compared with fellow 10s VCU (35), Syracuse (41) and Pittsburgh (45).

Iowa had success in a similar situation a year ago. As a 7 seed, it trounced a smaller-conference regular-season champion in Davidson to advance to the round of 32 before falling to second-seeded Gonzaga in what was a virtual home game in Seattle.

A similar showing Friday by Iowa against Temple would likely set up a matchup with No. 2-seeded Villanova — certainly a potent foe, especially considering the Wildcats will be playing less than 2 hours from their Philadelphia-area campus.

But despite Villanova’s impressive 29-5 record, there are no quality wins outside of the Big East. The Wildcats outlasted the Hawkeyes, 88-83, two winters ago in the Battle 4 Atlantis tournament — a sign that these teams could be competitive with each other again.

If Kellogg is correct, that would send the Hawkeyes to the regional semifinal in Louisville, Ky. — where waiting would be a virtual toss-up game, or maybe one that sees them as a favorite. They might face No. 3-seeded Miami (Fla.), No. 6 Arizona or even 11th-seeded play-in foes Wichita State or Vanderbilt. Win that, and maybe it’s a memorable showdown with top-seeded Kansas or a rematch with fifth-seeded Maryland for a shot at the Final Four in Houston.

It’s easy to get hung up on what happened to the Hawkeyes lately, but this bracket presents a terrific second chance to rekindle the magic that they rode to the top five of the national polls in late January and early February.

The entire article:

http://www.hawkcentral.com/story/sp...a-bracket-analysis-temple-villanova/81746890/
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimbob22
Clark I think is hoping that January version of Iowa shows up. If the recent shows up we get beat by Temple by 10+. I realize Temples #'s are not good, but they have played some good competition this year. Their coach was interviewed last night and he said the reason their FG% is so low, is because his players take some "bad/quick" shots. Said his focus in their run has been to get quality looks and also locking down on defense.

I think Temple will try to D up on the hawks with physical defense. This is a game where I think Jok/Uthoff will have to fight through everything to get good looks. Iowa is going to need that 3rd option. If they do not have it, it will be a struggle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nohawknamesleft
I like his optimism. It is, however, unwarranted.
This is not the Iowa team of mid- January. The current versions flaws have been well exposed for all to see.
IF they pull it together enough to take care of temple that will be as far as they go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SJeagleEye
If the Hawks play up to their talent level, they should make the Sweet 16. It just depends on which team shows up. If it is the team form the first half of the season or the team from second half of the season. And yes, the selection show was too long.
 
Brave pick. If I were a betting man I wouldn't touch Iowa to make the Sweet 16 without astronomical odds.
 
These games have Fran perked up maybe even half chubbed. Beating a couple Philly teams has to have Fran motivated and I'm sure he has the team rallying behind him. Hawks to the Sweet 16.
 
Probably in the minority, but I think the Hawks show up for this one. Gesell and Clemmons should have a chip on their shoulder from the BTT, and it's 4 seniors playing potentially their last game as Hawkeyes. From what I'm seeing, Temple is primarily a defensive, "make your opponent beat themselves" sort of team, and I think Iowa (when they are hitting shots, and I think they will) will just be too good offensively for the Owls.

Edit: Villanova on the other hand could be a mess. I could see Brunson/Arcidiacono having a Gonzaga-esque game against the Hawks
 
Clark actually is not an Iowa fan and would much rather see a Villanova - Temple matchup. He merely said this so that both those teams can tell the media that they were these overlooked underdogs with an us against the world mentality and the proverbial chip on the shoulder because nobody picked them to win.........thing.

That about sums it up, yes?
 
Just goes to show you Clark wasn't paying that much attention to the Hawkeye basketball team, particularly near the end of the season.

I am one for picking a cinderalla or two, but this Iowa team is mostly likely NOT it.
 
Jay Bilas says the Hawks will lose to Temple. Kellogg obviously much smarter than Bilas.

Hmmm. I read his 'longer than 5 minutes to fill out a bracket' piece on ESPN.com earlier this afternoon, and he picked Iowa. Picked 'Nova in the R32, of course, but had the Hawks getting past Temple.
 
Its a toss up between us and Temple. I think it depends on our guards if they can play smart and together we will be fine. Temple is a decent team and they have athletes all over the floor. I realize everyone wants to compare this to "davidson" last year, but this temple team is loaded with athletes who have size and quickness. Their defense is very good and their offense struggles, but they make up for it on the defensive end. Iowa has to play smart defense and get good looks on offense. I am hoping the hawks can win this one!
 
This team has zero confidence right now...sweet 16? No way in hell. Of course there's always hope. But that's all we've got...hope...not confidence. Dom Uhl, is he still on the team? Good grief...this team is playing like a bunch of pussies.
 
Early in CBS’ way-too-long two-hour broadcast to unveil the NCAA Tournament bracket, Iowa’s name popped onto the screen.

A few moments later, Iowa coach Fran McCaffery and the rest of the basketball-watching nation heard network analyst Clark Kellogg confidently pick the seventh-seeded Hawkeyes to advance to the Sweet 16. Iowa has not made a Sweet 16 appearance in 17 years (Dr Tom Davis' last year as head coach).

“I think (Kellogg)’s one of the best in the business for what he does. Been that way for many, many years,” McCaffery said Sunday night after watching the announcement with his players at Carver-Hawkeye Arena. “Gotten to know him. I just appreciate his professionalism. He wouldn’t have said it if he didn’t believe it.”

Underdog seeds have made deep runs before. In the last six NCAA Tournaments, a total of 29 teams seeded sixth or below advanced to the Sweet 16. Five did it last year, including two No. 7 seeds — one of them, Michigan State, got to the Final Four.

Two years ago, seventh-seeded Connecticut won a national title. In 2012, No. 7 Florida made the Elite Eight.

As rough as the Hawkeyes’ last 3½ weeks have been, there’s a lot to like about their side of the bracket. As a No. 7 seed, they drew by far the lowest-rated 10 seed in Temple. The Owls, who rank 315th nationally in field-goal percentage, have a KenPom.com overall rating of No. 86 nationally, compared with fellow 10s VCU (35), Syracuse (41) and Pittsburgh (45).

Iowa had success in a similar situation a year ago. As a 7 seed, it trounced a smaller-conference regular-season champion in Davidson to advance to the round of 32 before falling to second-seeded Gonzaga in what was a virtual home game in Seattle.

A similar showing Friday by Iowa against Temple would likely set up a matchup with No. 2-seeded Villanova — certainly a potent foe, especially considering the Wildcats will be playing less than 2 hours from their Philadelphia-area campus.

But despite Villanova’s impressive 29-5 record, there are no quality wins outside of the Big East. The Wildcats outlasted the Hawkeyes, 88-83, two winters ago in the Battle 4 Atlantis tournament — a sign that these teams could be competitive with each other again.

If Kellogg is correct, that would send the Hawkeyes to the regional semifinal in Louisville, Ky. — where waiting would be a virtual toss-up game, or maybe one that sees them as a favorite. They might face No. 3-seeded Miami (Fla.), No. 6 Arizona or even 11th-seeded play-in foes Wichita State or Vanderbilt. Win that, and maybe it’s a memorable showdown with top-seeded Kansas or a rematch with fifth-seeded Maryland for a shot at the Final Four in Houston.

It’s easy to get hung up on what happened to the Hawkeyes lately, but this bracket presents a terrific second chance to rekindle the magic that they rode to the top five of the national polls in late January and early February.

The entire article:

http://www.hawkcentral.com/story/sp...a-bracket-analysis-temple-villanova/81746890/


I like Clarke Kellogg's analysis and game play announcement, however he must have missed the last several games. Go Hawks!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT