ADVERTISEMENT

Challenge Grassley? Patty Judge is thinking about it

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,642
63,044
113
Not that she would have a chance in hell of beating him:

Amid a heated controversy over a Supreme Court vacancy, Democrats in Iowa and nationally are weighing whether Republican U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley, considered nearly unbeatable, may now be vulnerable.

Patty Judge, a former Iowa lieutenant governor and secretary of agriculture, told The Des Moines Register she believes Grassley deserves a real race in 2016 — and that she’s thinking about running.

“I’m not ruling it out,” Judge said Thursday morning when reached at home in Albia.

Judge, who was twice elected statewide as the secretary of agriculture before serving as lieutenant governor under Chet Culver from 2007 to 2011, said Grassley deserves a strong challenge this year because of the distinctly un-Iowan way he’s handled the High Court vacancy left by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death earlier this month.

“Iowans have always been straight shooters, and up until the recent time I would have said the same thing about Chuck,” Judge said.

Grassley is chairman of the Judiciary Committee, which oversees the confirmation process for court appointees. He announced this week that the committee will not even hold confirmation hearings for a nominee offered by Democratic President Barack Obama — which would essentially end the process even before it begins.

He and other Senate Republicans contend that delaying confirmation until 2017 will give voters a voice in the appointment, since they'll elect a new president in November.

“I don’t like this double-speak," Judge said. "I don’t like this deliberate obstruction of the process. I think Chuck Grassley owes us better. He’s been with us a long time. Maybe he’s been with us too long.”

Three Democratic candidates have already announced plans to challenge the six-term U.S. senator: state Sen. Robb Hogg of Cedar Rapids and former lawmakers Bob Krause of Fairfield and Tom Fiegen of Clarence.

Hogg, who last month announced endorsements from 61 of his fellow Democratic state lawmakers, said interest in his campaign has been “off the charts” in recent days, with increased contributions and heightened social media interest.

No matter who runs, though, challenging Grassley represents a monumental task. Grassley has held elective office since 1959, is nearly universally known in Iowa and routinely rates as the most popular politician in the state. His seniority and powerful committee positions in the Senate, moreover, ensure vast financial and institutional support.

Any challenger would require major assistance from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which raises money and provides logistical support in competitive races across the country.

A spokeswoman for the committee would not discuss candidate recruitment efforts on Thursday, but suggested challengers may be emboldened by Grassley's role in the nomination fight.

“By refusing to hold a hearing on a Supreme Court nominee, Sen. Grassley has decided not to do his job,” DSCC National Press Secretary Lauren Passalacqua said in a statement. “His obstruction is yet another factor weakening his case for re-election.”

A Democrat jumping in the race now also faces another hurdle: a narrow window to get on the ballot. Candidate filing begins next Monday and closes March 18. To qualify for the June 7 primary ballot, a Democratic U.S. Senate candidate must gather at least 2,104 signatures from Iowa voters, and those signatures must come from at least 10 different counties.

Candidates often collect their signatures at party caucuses, which were held three weeks ago. To gather them now, party officials said, probably requires hiring a vendor and quickly sending them across the state to get the necessary signatures before the March 18 deadline.

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...lenge-grassley-patty-judge-thinking/80931534/
 
Senator Charles Grassley will celebrate his 83rd birthday
in September of this year. There is no good reason for him
to put his health at risk by running for another 6 year term.
The citizens of Iowa can find another person to replace him

Bottom Line: Who wants an 89 year old senator in 6 years
from now?.
 
Senator Charles Grassley will celebrate his 83rd birthday
in September of this year. There is no good reason for him
to put his health at risk by running for another 6 year term.
The citizens of Iowa can find another person to replace him

Bottom Line: Who wants an 89 year old senator in 6 years
from now?.

A state that wants to have a powerful senator. Seniority is what gets you the powerful committee chairs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbq hawk 32
Grassley and the rest of the GOP are breaking the law. They are required under the Judiciary Act of 1869 to have 9 judges. Saying 8 is enough isn't an option.
 
Senator Charles Grassley will celebrate his 83rd birthday
in September of this year. There is no good reason for him
to put his health at risk by running for another 6 year term.
The citizens of Iowa can find another person to replace him

Bottom Line: Who wants an 89 year old senator in 6 years
from now
?.
The crazy thing is if you blindly asked people on the street, you would get an overwhelming "NO." And yet, Grassley will destroy whoever runs against him by about 30 percentage points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Senator Charles Grassley will celebrate his 83rd birthday
in September of this year. There is no good reason for him
to put his health at risk by running for another 6 year term.
The citizens of Iowa can find another person to replace him

Bottom Line: Who wants an 89 year old senator in 6 years
from now?.
Who would have thought that Iowa would get our own Strom Thurmond?
 
Who would have though the Democrat party of Iowa would have fallen so far as to run that cabal of losers. Is that really the best they can do? How old is Patty Judge anyway?
 
Who would have though the Democrat party of Iowa would have fallen so far as to run that cabal of losers. Is that really the best they can do? How old is Patty Judge anyway?

Hey, she's way younger than Art Small was when he was the token Democratic Senatorial candidate in 2010!;)
 
Chuck Grassley is putting party above nation on this SCOTUS thing and the people of Iowa know it and don't approve...but Grassley will win in a landslide next November and help move the meter a few poinst in favor of Trump in Iowa as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Chucky stays around for the very same reason Teflon Terry does. He wants personal notoriety in terms of length of service.

Does anyone here really think Grassley can be as sharp as he needs to be? I realize these guys have :advisors", but him running again is nothing but being selfish.

That said... I believe the only Dem with a chance to beat him would be Vilsack.
 
I think Grassley runs, wins, and then resigns in about six months. Bran star appoints Reynolds to serve until November of 2018, the next statewide general election. She can then run for the remainder of the term as an incumbent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MitchL
I can almost guarantee everyone that the ONLY way Reynolds holds either Senator or Governor title is in that type of scenario. She will need that type of advantage to win an election of that magnitude. Before his cancer revelation, I always thought Latham was destined to be Gov or Sen.

Outside of Braley's gaffes, Iowans rarely vote out a lifer.

Steve King knows he could never win a Statewide election, so happily, we don't have to worry about him.

Reynolds has skeletons in her closet, if Teflon and Chucky don't resign mid-term, she's not getting elected on her own.
 
Senator Charles Grassley will celebrate his 83rd birthday
in September of this year. There is no good reason for him
to put his health at risk by running for another 6 year term.
The citizens of Iowa can find another person to replace him

Bottom Line: Who wants an 89 year old senator in 6 years
from now?.
Who wants an 83 year old senator who refuses to promise that this would be his last election?
 
I think Grassley runs, wins, and then resigns in about six months. Bran star appoints Reynolds to serve until November of 2018, the next statewide general election. She can then run for the remainder of the term as an incumbent.
Reynolds will be under a cloud of a failed Branstad term.
I think if there is some grand scheme for Chuck to retire, then the fix is in for him to pass the seat to his grandson Patrick.
 
Senator Charles Grassley will celebrate his 83rd birthday
in September of this year. There is no good reason for him
to put his health at risk by running for another 6 year term.
The citizens of Iowa can find another person to replace him

Bottom Line: Who wants an 89 year old senator in 6 years
from now?.
Crazed right wing Iowa Republicans would be my guess.
 
I was thinking about another person who may enter the race today as I read the ICPC. There was an article about a rally in Des Moines against the medicare takeover being led by Chet Culver. There is a guy who could jump in and have enough immediate name recognition and money raising ability to challenge Chuck.
He has won a statewide election and lost a statewide election. This may be the best bet since Tom Vilsack will not get in. He's getting up there in years himself, but he would give Chuck a real fight.
 
Grassley and the rest of the GOP are breaking the law. They are required under the Judiciary Act of 1869 to have 9 judges. Saying 8 is enough isn't an option.
Well, how about a president that doesn't do his job - such as enforcing laws on the books. Also

"Chuck Grassley is putting party above nation on this SCOTUS thing and the people of Iowa know it and don't approve...but Grassley will win in a landslide next November and help move the meter a few poinst in favor of Trump in Iowa as well". So if the MAJORITY of voters elect him, then how can the people of Iowa think he is putting party about the nation???
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT