I gave you the answer.
If you think my answer is incorrect, email the Georgia AG and ask him, yourself.
You appear to be too big of a pussy and whiner to "take action yourself" here.
Judge gives control of Giuliani assets to Georgia poll workers he defamed
- Thread starter cigaretteman
- Start date
If you think my answer is incorrect, email the Georgia AG and ask him, yourself.
You appear to be too big of a pussy and whiner to "take action yourself" here.
That's not an answer. Not even pretending to be one. You confirmed that you don't know the reason you feel the way you do. NPC logic
It's not, but I know you're really bad at this so take your L and let's both move on from you being unable to explain her illegal actions.
It is.
You're fully uneducated on what "election counting procedures" are.
The GA Attorney General can help you out on that.
If you'll simply send that email along with your "Tweet".
Is it standard procedure to lie to poll watchers about a water main break so they can scan the same ballots repeatedly after they leave? From boxes underneath a skirted table? You're such a fool lol
Again: Are you going to email the Georgia Atty General's office, or not?
You can get an answer, once and for all, if you simply send your concerns there.
(Note: He's a Republican, too)
You refuse to answer the other convo so I went to other leftists also committing fraud. Too common in the cult these days.
I've given you the answer multiple times now.
Along with the advice to email the Georgia AG (or, Sec'y of State) if you're confused by "rando videos" people posted on Twitter.
All of those Republicans who oversee Georgia Elections have informed you there is no fraud.
Email them, yourself and get the answer directly.
hawkeyetraveler
HB Heisman
This thread is peak HBOT. I’ve never seen two people do a better job of talking past each other than Scruddy and Joe in this thread.
Does anyone else believe if we locked them in a prison cell together they would be arguing the literal exact same points 50 years later?
Or is it just me?
Does anyone else believe if we locked them in a prison cell together they would be arguing the literal exact same points 50 years later?
Or is it just me?
I put Scruddy, Northern and other election denying MAGA conspiracy theorists on ignore months and months ago. Haven’t seen any thing scruddy amd others have posted since, and am therefore not dumber for it. There is too much info on this board and other places to waste time reading their garbage and arguing back and forth. .
I can’t figure out why many of you don’t put these posters on ignore, and instead keep replying to them. I guarantee if you were seated next to them at a bar, you’d get up and move within a couple minutes of them letting you know all about their MAGA allegiance and how the world really works.
I have.
Along with suggesting you email people who are not "smarter than me"; people who "actually work with and oversee elections in Georgia", who can set you straight.
But you seem to have no interest at all in learning the answers here, you just like posting disinformation.
How am I "talking past him"?
I've already answered they election workers will put a run of ballots thru a counter >1 time, to verify it's giving consistent numbers for them to record and verify. They probably do that on >1 machine, too, as a QA process.
As well as telling him to email Georgia's officials if he does not like that answer.
As I already said, your position is "I believe this but I don't know why, please email someone smarter than me". Keep going off though, queen.
hawkeyetraveler
HB Heisman
Joe, I mean this as sincere feedback to hopefully improve your posting style. You have never met a dead horse that you didn’t want to keep beating. You argue to argue and I have never once seen you admit you are wrong.
As it happens I am 100% sure you are right in this thread and I usually (but not always) agree with you. But it does get tiresome to see you repeat the same things over and over again. Scruddy is not going to listen to you and you are not going to listen to him so why do the two of you keep arguing?
Maybe agree to disagree and move on for once?
No; my position is based on what I know the Georgia elections officials have already said and testified to, as well as basic knowledge of "process controls" - something that is a major element of vote counting.
That is not me "talking over him".
That is Scruddy not reading what is posted for him.
Nah, I read what you wrote, the problem is I don't speak "short bus" so I have a hard time understanding your ramblings that often contradict yourself.
hawkeyetraveler
HB Heisman
The point is you latch on to an argument and never ever relent, even when the other person will never be persuaded. If I used the wrong phrase to describe that phenomenon, then I stand corrected.
None the less I stand by my original view that if we left the two of you alone for 50 years you would still be here arguing the exact same points. Maybe just move on?
I respect your efforts here but you can't reason with a vegetable
