Sling son will not be anything but mop up. Too slow. I know he was hurt but not impressed with ball handling so just another stand still shooter. This will JO or worse.
Pemsl is neither a combo guard nor a wing forward.Originally posted by BeepBeepInMyJeep:
I think we're all a bit confused as to how it is all going to fit together, but we are not the experts that are going to have to figure it out. Seems like we have an entire team in 2016 and beyond that is nothing but combo guards and wing forwards. It will be interesting to watch, but at this point I think Fran has earned the trust of the fanbase and even an understanding amongst most reasonable fans that they will COULD take some lumps over the next couple years.
Originally posted by The Sleeping Dog:
Ed Horton was 6'8" and one of the better, and bigger, the of C/F types you will find. A truly rare beast. He also had 7' Lohaus on the floor with him and 6'8" 230 pound Al Lorentzen as a back up, also a very big and strong guy. No one on the roster next season is anything like Ed Horton.
Also,really big guys did give Ed some trouble.
Who will guard that enormous Hitler Youth looking uberman from Purdue when Woody isn't on the floor. Uthoff, gives up 3-5 inches and I can't even imagine the muscle weight. A typical MSU 6'9' ish center?
That is an ugly scenario.
Let me help. 12-6 last year, no where near the doom you predicted. Take a deep breath and relax. A faster and more athletic player can always front a big post. Denial of the ball is the new defense since offensive players are allowed to ram their rears repeatedly into players and switch their pivot foot repeatedly.
Front them, deny the ball.
Our head coach disagrees with you.Originally posted by bravehawks1:
Sling son will not be anything but mop up. Too slow. I know he was hurt but not impressed with ball handling so just another stand still shooter. This will JO or worse.
You don't even have enough sense to call him by his real name. Way to disrespect a good kid.Originally posted by bravehawks1:
Sling son will not be anything but mop up. Too slow. I know he was hurt but not impressed with ball handling so just another stand still shooter. This will JO or worse.
First, Purdue's big won't play the whole game. Second, what may be more ugly is the Purdue big trying to guard JU on the perimeter. Why are folks always going out of their way to paint the ugly scenario?Originally posted by The Sleeping Dog:
Who will guard that enormous Hitler Youth looking uberman from Purdue when Woody isn't on the floor. Uthoff, gives up 3-5 inches and I can't even imagine the muscle weight. A typical MSU 6'9' ish center?
That is an ugly scenario.
Intelligence just oozes from this post!Originally posted by bravehawks1:
Sling son will not be anything but mop up. Too slow. I know he was hurt but not impressed with ball handling so just another stand still shooter. This will JO or worse.
While I agree with you and Hooper, you listed his Jr stats. From his signing day bio:Originally posted by BBHawk:
Not the OP but Ellingson shot over 48% from the 3 (86 of 179) and over 90% from the FT line as a senior in HS. He is a great shooter. The only question is whether he can do that on the college level. Based on the little I saw in his 21 minutes (4-6 from the 3), I would say the odds are good he will make a good percentage of the 3s he takes. The only question is whether he can defend well enough to be a B1G guard. But he definitely has skills.Originally posted by clickhere 01:
What are you basing this on,his 21 minutes played and 8 shot attempts?Originally posted by hooper56:
Ellingson can flat out shoot the rock and moves very well off the ball. he can hit a standstill three or hit it coming off a screen with a hand in his face. He will win some games for us.
This video shows him working out: https://vimeo.com/72143320. Strangely enough, I think his jump shot form looks a lot like that of a mostly hated ex Iowa coach when he was a college star...
If there are fans dismissing him already, i agree,i don't get it either. It's ridiculous to write him off when he's played so little. That said, i'm also not gonna go to the other end of the spectrum and buy in to hoopers hyperbole for the same reasons. All we have is 21 minutes of mop-up duty against the Longwoods and Alcorn States of the world,plus some high school stats.Originally posted by hawkeyemark:
It certainly advances the notion that he played well and won games for his team at the level he played at against his peers. So it does seem reasonable to think that he has a good chance of shooting well at the college level as well even though we'll just have to see. I frankly don't get why so many fans dismiss Ellingson so very early in his career when he has barely played. It really doesn't make sense when what glimpses we have had he seems like a pretty decent player who can definitely shoot.Originally posted by rillo 62:
I certainly hope you're right but i don't think high school stats do much to advance the narrative that he's a great shooter and win some games for us.Originally posted by BBHawk:
Not the OP but Ellingson shot over 48% from the 3 (86 of 179) and over 90% from the FT line as a senior in HS. He is a great shooter. The only question is whether he can do that on the college level. Based on the little I saw in his 21 minutes (4-6 from the 3), I would say the odds are good he will make a good percentage of the 3s he takes. The only question is whether he can defend well enough to be a B1G guard. But he definitely has skills.Originally posted by clickhere 01:
What are you basing this on,his 21 minutes played and 8 shot attempts?Originally posted by hooper56:
Ellingson can flat out shoot the rock and moves very well off the ball. he can hit a standstill three or hit it coming off a screen with a hand in his face. He will win some games for us.
This video shows him working out: https://vimeo.com/72143320. Strangely enough, I think his jump shot form looks a lot like that of a mostly hated ex Iowa coach when he was a college star...
This post was edited on 4/16 4:39 PM by rillo 62
Lets not ever put Gatens and Josh in the same sentence again. Gatens is a much better athlete. Josh is a poor shooter and can't play defense. His defense was just plain bad and the offense was a jumbled mess when he was in the game. Lets move on and not act like it is going out on a limb that Brady can have a bigger contribution than Josh. He +/- will probably be better as a frosh than the senior Josh.Originally posted by bouma1415:
In the few minutes that I saw Ellingson play, it looked like he lacked the athleticism that Gatens and Ogelsby had. Hopefully, he works on that aspect of his game. You have to be able to play defense or all the offense in the world does not help the team.
When you talk about the size of Big's you need to consider more than height. Can we go smaller with the thin Big's Fran has shown a preference for?Originally posted by RocknRollface:
I think it's been pretty well documented that there just aren't that many teams playing big anymore, even in the big ten.
Purdue is about it.
Msu and Wisconsins 4s were 6'6 and 6'7 .
I do think we need another 5 though.
It's a lot harder to skin a tomcat than a kitten. Speed and quickness are great, and we all are happy to see more long athletic players coming to Iowa. Add one or two brutes and a PG, and we will all be very happy.Originally posted by hooper56:
The thing is, there is more than one way to skin the cat. Teams with these big guys might have a tough time matching up with speed and quickness. It goes both ways.
Problem is he's much smaller than Josh.Originally posted by hawkeyesports92:
Put me in the camp that thinks Brady is going to light it up and be our best 3 point shooter since Gatens. He will be what we wanted Josh to be.
Brady played in the Milwaukee Greater Metro League, so his 20+ PPG average in HS (and all time leading scorer title at his HS) says something about his ability to get open and score. He wasn't just a stand still 3 point shooter either. He scored quite a bit inside the arc.Originally posted by RocknRollface:
Problem is he's much smaller than Josh.Originally posted by hawkeyesports92:
Put me in the camp that thinks Brady is going to light it up and be our best 3 point shooter since Gatens. He will be what we wanted Josh to be.
Im sure he can shoot when open but will he be able to get his shot off when defended, or get himself open. Will he be able to gaurd anyone.
To to me he looks like a freshman in high school not college.