ADVERTISEMENT

Clint Eastwood makes joke about Caitlyn Jenner,..

If you think it's a right to say whatever you want and force a TV station to air it, then you are calling for government enforcement. Or you could admit you don't have a right to say whatever you want and force it onto TV and your entire argument is bogus. Either way, point to me.
Who said anyone was trying to force Spike to air what Clint said? Are you saying what Clint said was truly that repulsive to you?
 
Jim Brown was a great college and pro football player
who cashed in on his fame and became a Grade B
movie actor.

Bruce Jenner was an Olympic Gold Medal winner
who cashed in on his fame and became a Grade B
TV actor on "Keeping Up With The Kardashians".

The difference between Brown and Jenner.........
Brown kept his masculinity and Jenner has chosen
to switch teams and become a "woman" who still
has a penis.

Bottom Line: Clint Eastwood calls them as he sees
them and does not care about being PC.
 
Wow, you're just kind of a special one aren't ya? Are a troll Patrick? Explain what you mean here. You're ranting again, and it's sounding silly.

See, you are too do to even understand the criticism. My post was obvious, and Natural covered it well enough for me not to above.

But I will ask this: what "right" are you alleging, and who is violating it?
 
Who said anyone was trying to force Spike to air what Clint said? Are you saying what Clint said was truly that repulsive to you?
This is exactly what theIowaHawk was getting at, you don't know what a right is. If Clink has a right to say whatever he wants on Spike and have it aired, then you are asking the government to enforce Clint's rights. That's what that language means. Clint doesn't offend me, have you seen Paint Your Wagon?
 
If you think it's a right to say whatever you want and force a TV station to air it, then you are calling for government enforcement. Or you could admit you don't have a right to say whatever you want and force it onto TV and your entire argument is bogus. Either way, point to me.

I think his point is just that we're a bunch of sensitive sallys, and Spike admins are pussies. Nothing more, nothing less.

images
 
See, you are too do to even understand the criticism. My post was obvious, and Natural covered it well enough for me not to above.

But I will ask this: what "right" are you alleging, and who is violating it?
Are you being a little to picky here Iowa? He has a right to say what he said. Which was harmless, do you agree? But because of ramifications from those that would get bent out of shape about it, Spike chose to not air it, to avoid it. You remind me so much of Parser.
 
This is exactly what theIowaHawk was getting at, you don't know what a right is. If Clink has a right to say whatever he wants on Spike and have it aired, then you are asking the government to enforce Clint's rights. That's what that language means. Clint doesn't offend me, have you seen Paint Your Wagon?
No, that's not what I'm saying. Is that we have a right to say what we want. In this VERY harmless comment made by Clint, he was censored, because of the public backlash they may occur. Which is still occuring by the way. Otherwise the link I provided wouldn't be sitting there bitching about it. Who is Clink? I'm sorry, but I can't be sure you meant Clint, because I see Clink. I like you, have begun to be VERY picky about words. Did you mean Clink? or Clint? Or Clunk?
 
Are you being a little to picky here Iowa? He has a right to say what he said. Which was harmless, do you agree? But because of ramifications from those that would get bent out of shape about it, Spike chose to not air it, to avoid it. You remind me so much of Parser.

And when radio stations dropped the Dixie Chicks after one of them commented on W...you blasted those radio stations?
 
No, that's not what I'm saying. Is that we have a right to say what we want. In this VERY harmless comment made by Clint, he was censored, because of the public backlash they may occur. Which is still occuring by the way. Otherwise the link I provided wouldn't be sitting there bitching about it. Who is Clink? I'm sorry, but I can't be sure you meant Clint, because I see Clink. I like you, have begun to be VERY picky about words. Did you mean Clink? or Clint? Or Clunk?
How is Clint being censored when we're discussing his comment and it's being reported in multiple outlets?
 
And that's a salient point.

Not really. Clint has the right to say what he wants. People have the right to support him or complain about him. Spike has the right to determine what's in their best interests in terms of airing it or not. And AT has the right to complain about their decision. In doing that, he's not one bit different than the folks complaining about what Clint said. Neither better nor worse...just exercising his right to complain. It's THINKING he's above that that's the error.
 
Not really. Clint has the right to say what he wants. People have the right to support him or complain about him. Spike has the right to determine what's in their best interests in terms of airing it or not. And AT has the right to complain about their decision. In doing that, he's not one bit different than the folks complaining about what Clint said. Neither better nor worse...just exercising his right to complain. It's THINKING he's above that that's the error.
I'm always too generous.
 
Not really. Clint has the right to say what he wants. People have the right to support him or complain about him. Spike has the right to determine what's in their best interests in terms of airing it or not. And AT has the right to complain about their decision. In doing that, he's not one bit different than the folks complaining about what Clint said. Neither better nor worse...just exercising his right to complain. It's THINKING he's above that that's the error.
That's not even really my point. My point
I'm always too generous.
No you're not.
 
I love Paint Your Wagon. Jean Seburg...wowzers.

Probably my favorite Lee Marvin movie also, outside of Point Blank.
 
No, that's not what I'm saying. Is that we have a right to say what we want. In this VERY harmless comment made by Clint, he was censored, because of the public backlash they may occur. Which is still occuring by the way. Otherwise the link I provided wouldn't be sitting there bitching about it. Who is Clink? I'm sorry, but I can't be sure you meant Clint, because I see Clink. I like you, have begun to be VERY picky about words. Did you mean Clink? or Clint? Or Clunk?

Why is it so important to you that you need to call it a "VERY harmless comment,". If it wasn't "very" harmless, would his "right" be different?
 
My point was that what he said was harmless, but it was seen as harmful.

In your opinion. Like I said, it seems he was saying she was "acting" like a woman. That's the only way it even makes sense as some kind of joke. And now you're complaining because other people were offended by it. Complain away...you're the same as them. Embrace your right to be offended by their taking offense.
 
In your opinion. Like I said, it seems he was saying she was "acting" like a woman. That's the only way it even makes sense as some kind of joke. And now you're complaining because other people were offended by it. Complain away...you're the same as them. Embrace your right to be offended by their taking offense.
Fair enough.
 
Ok, so if it was only a "harmless comment," not VERY, would your opinion be different? If it was a harmful comment, does Clint lose his "right" you are so adamant exists?
No, especially if it was funny. Harmful can be hilarious sometimes. I feel my other personality beginning to emerge. It's about to get funky in here.
 
That seems backwards to me. You're having trouble with your words today. Day drinking?
Generous means that you were given too much. So again, it depends on whether you believe he was a bit too much for your tastes. I'm just fishing to see if you bite at the fatties.
 
No, especially if it was funny. Harmful can be hilarious sometimes. I feel my other personality beginning to emerge. It's about to get funky in here.

So, it had absolutely no bearing on this issue that you raised, at all, but you still felt it necessary to all-caps VERY.

Let me recap:

Clint says something.
People complain about Clint saying it.
Spike decides not to air that thing.
Aegon/Prime complains about people complaining, and about Spike.
Aegon thinks that Clint's right to free speech has been violated, and complains about it.

Is that about the gist of it Aegon?
 
So, it had absolutely no bearing on this issue that you raised, at all, but you still felt it necessary to all-caps VERY.

Let me recap:

Clint says something.
People complain about Clint saying it.
Spike decides not to air that thing.
Aegon/Prime complains about people complaining, and about Spike.
Aegon thinks that Clint's right to free speech has been violated, and complains about it.

Is that about the gist of it Aegon?
I love all caps Iowa. Don't be a Cap Hater. I sense an anger in you Iowa. What drives your angry ways? I'll tell you what drives mine. Control. Trying to control people is something you do often isn't it. What do you think about your recap Iowa. What's your take on it?
 
Let me recap:

Clint says something.
People complain about Clint saying it.
Spike decides not to air that thing.
Aegon/Prime complains about people complaining, and about Spike.
Aegon thinks that Clint's right to free speech has been violated, and complains about it.

Is that about the gist of it Aegon?
 
Let me recap:

Clint says something.
People complain about Clint saying it.
Spike decides not to air that thing.
Aegon/Prime complains about people complaining, and about Spike.
Aegon thinks that Clint's right to free speech has been violated, and complains about it.

Is that about the gist of it Aegon?
Could you repeat this a few more times?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT