ADVERTISEMENT

Crazy Dems want to replace our current Liar in Chief with another Liar in Chief.

NoleandDawg

HB King
Mar 29, 2002
57,076
334
83
Hillary told the families of the people killed in Bengazi that it was because of the video. We all know this was a lie.


http://nypost.com/2015/12/09/hillary-clintons-most-repugnant-lie/

George Stephanopoulos asked her Sunday if she’d told the victims it was about the film. Clinton gave a flat “no.”

She added: “I said very clearly there had been a terrorist group, uh, that had taken responsibility on Facebook, um . . .”

At least four family members disagree.

Tyrone Woods’ father said he hugged Clinton and shook her hand. Then “she said we are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of my son . . . She said ‘the filmmaker who was responsible for the death of your son.’ ”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capital1Hawk
Takes a scary cold heart to lie to the loved ones of folks you were responsible for protecting. Beginning to believe HRC is a sociopath.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Speedway1
Hillary told the families of the people killed in Bengazi that it was because of the video. We all know this was a lie.


http://nypost.com/2015/12/09/hillary-clintons-most-repugnant-lie/

George Stephanopoulos asked her Sunday if she’d told the victims it was about the film. Clinton gave a flat “no.”

She added: “I said very clearly there had been a terrorist group, uh, that had taken responsibility on Facebook, um . . .”

At least four family members disagree.

Tyrone Woods’ father said he hugged Clinton and shook her hand. Then “she said we are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of my son . . . She said ‘the filmmaker who was responsible for the death of your son.’ ”
Haven't you heard? Dems don't care if you lie, as long as you say what they want you to say.
 
Guess Hillary owning the GOP during their 13 hour interview of her wasn't enough? You doubling down on stupidity?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Haven't you heard? Dems don't care if you lie, as long as you say what they want you to say.

Actually, they are smart enough to know that there was no lie in the first place unlike the dimwitted Republicans trying to make up an issue where none exists.
 
Guess Hillary owning the GOP during their 13 hour interview of her wasn't enough? You doubling down on stupidity?

Hillary admitted that she repeatedly lied about the video. Not sure how that's "owning" anything.

If anything, the media is "owning" us for not reporting the news and covering up for Her Majesty.
 
Actually, they are smart enough to know that there was no lie in the first place unlike the dimwitted Republicans trying to make up an issue where none exists.

So, the Ambassador was killed by protestors over a Youtube video?
 
I'm saying that Benghazi has been beat to death. So get off of it.

63803651.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
You're about to nominate a fascist but you're making a big deal about a politician who might have lied? Seriously?
 
So, the Ambassador was killed by protestors over a Youtube video?

That was the most plausible explanation at the time, and was what intelligence sources were saying, and, as Ms Clinton so acurately put it, "what difference does it make?" Seriously, this has got to be one of the stupidest criticism the wingnuts have ever come up with, and that's saying something.
 
Hillary told the families of the people killed in Bengazi that it was because of the video. We all know this was a lie.


http://nypost.com/2015/12/09/hillary-clintons-most-repugnant-lie/

George Stephanopoulos asked her Sunday if she’d told the victims it was about the film. Clinton gave a flat “no.”

She added: “I said very clearly there had been a terrorist group, uh, that had taken responsibility on Facebook, um . . .”

At least four family members disagree.

Tyrone Woods’ father said he hugged Clinton and shook her hand. Then “she said we are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of my son . . . She said ‘the filmmaker who was responsible for the death of your son.’ ”

Better get used to it, Dawg. She's your next president whether you like it or not.
 
That was the most plausible explanation at the time, and was what intelligence sources were saying, and, as Ms Clinton so acurately put it, "what difference does it make?" Seriously, this has got to be one of the stupidest criticism the wingnuts have ever come up with, and that's saying something.

It's because they're told what to think and they drink the Fox News Kool-Aid like it's ambrosia.
 
That was the most plausible explanation at the time, and was what intelligence sources were saying, and, as Ms Clinton so acurately put it, "what difference does it make?" Seriously, this has got to be one of the stupidest criticism the wingnuts have ever come up with, and that's saying something.

And yet, she told her daughter it was terrorists while continuing to publicly yammer about an offensive movie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22*43*51
That was the most plausible explanation at the time, and was what intelligence sources were saying, and, as Ms Clinton so acurately put it, "what difference does it make?" Seriously, this has got to be one of the stupidest criticism the wingnuts have ever come up with, and that's saying something.

It was the most convenient explanation during the run up of an election when her boss had just claimed AQ was "on the run".

Kind like "ISIS is contained" right before Paris.

...and "there is no domestic threat" right before San Bernardino.
 
Is this really the only dirt you have on Hillary? That she stuck to the talking points too long... That's it. That's it?

No. It's not the only dirt.

It's todays dirt. Tune in tomorrow for more dirt.
 
Is this really the only dirt you have on Hillary? That she stuck to the talking points too long... That's it. That's it?

So you're cool with her lying to the families of the victims? Just for political cover?

You're good with that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greenway12
Then let's fight about something new.

Okay, the new thing is Hillary's contention that all rape victims must be believed (except for women claiming they were raped by her husband... we don't have to believe them).
 
The heartbroken sister of fallen
 Benghazi hero Glen Doherty 
delivered her sharpest criticism yet of former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton yesterday, saying the presidential candidate “wasn’t truthful” about the 2012 terrorist attack.

“She knows that she knew what happened that day and she wasn’t truthful,” Kate Quigley said on Boston Herald Radio’s “Morning Meeting” show yesterday. “This is a woman that will do and say anything to get what she wants. I have very little respect for her. I know what she said to me and she can say all day long that she didn’t say it. That’s her cross to bear.”

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/local_coverage/2015/12/benghazi_hero_s_sis_rips_hillary_Clinton

It takes a special kind of democrat to look victims families in the eye (in front of the caskets) and lie to them about what happened.
 
So you're cool with her lying to the families of the victims? Just for political cover?

You're good with that?

Not at all, I think it sucks. And I'm not supporting Hillary, either. But at some point you have to realize that in the big picture that is DC politics, this is a drop in the ocean. Why Fox News decided this was THE issue they would focus on is beyond me. Why people have latched onto it doesn't make sense. Yes, she likely stuck with the story for political reasons for longer than she should have. You don't think this happens every day in Washington?
 
Then let's fight about something new.

She doubled down on her whopper on Sunday while speaking with Stephanopoulos. Am I to take it that you libs statute of limitations for lies is less than a week? Of course if Stephanopoulos had an iota of journalistic integrity he would have called her on this, but he didn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greenway12
Okay, the new thing is Hillary's contention that all rape victims must be believed (except for women claiming they were raped by her husband... we don't have to believe them).

Really? That's a new one to me. Link? (BTW I'm no Hillary supporter, just sick of this stupid story.)
 
The heartbroken sister of fallen
 Benghazi hero Glen Doherty 
delivered her sharpest criticism yet of former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton yesterday, saying the presidential candidate “wasn’t truthful” about the 2012 terrorist attack.

“She knows that she knew what happened that day and she wasn’t truthful,” Kate Quigley said on Boston Herald Radio’s “Morning Meeting” show yesterday. “This is a woman that will do and say anything to get what she wants. I have very little respect for her. I know what she said to me and she can say all day long that she didn’t say it. That’s her cross to bear.”

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/local_coverage/2015/12/benghazi_hero_s_sis_rips_hillary_Clinton

It takes a special kind of democrat to look victims families in the eye (in front of the caskets) and lie to them about what happened.

I am sure Pat Tillman's family would argue that it isn't just democrats that lie about causes of death.
 
Really? That's a new one to me. Link? (BTW I'm no Hillary supporter, just sick of this stupid story.)

Yeah, that's the latest wingnut contrived criticism of Hillary. All they have to do is make stuff up and let it reverberate around the echo chamber for a week or two and the wingnuts lap it up and accept it as fact. It would be quite fascinating to watch were it no so damaging for the country.
 
She doubled down on her whopper on Sunday while speaking with Stephanopoulos. Am I to take it that you libs statute of limitations for lies is less than a week? Of course if Stephanopoulos had an iota of journalistic integrity he would have called her on this, but he didn't.

She doubled down on what whopper? She's accused of so many ridiculous things by the right that it's hard to keep track.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
A
She doubled down on what whopper? She's accused of so many ridiculous things by the right that it's hard to keep track.


As I stated above, there was no "whopper." Just another made up "scandal" by the wingnut echo chamber. You'd think they'd learn after getting burned by crying wolf so many times, but they never seem to.
 
Maybe so. Please let me know which candidate for President lied to Tillman's family and I won't vote for them either.
 

Meh, seems to me she's trying to say we should give an accuser the benefit of the doubt and let the law decide. I know women who have suffered sexual assault and the last thing they deserve is being questioned before the facts are out. That said, I also believe the accused is innocent until proven guilty. This seems like another non-story brought up by the wingnuts and blown way out of proportion to discredit her.

Next!
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman

From your linked article: I think what she's getting at is that alleged sexual assault victims deserve to have their claims taken very seriously until there's reason to believe otherwise, not that accused parties should be presumed guilty under the law unless and until proof emerges that they're not. Her point applies to how self-described victims are treated when they first come forward. I don't think she's advocating any alterations to the legal process of how accused parties are dealt with as criminal cases are investigated and adjudicated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT