ADVERTISEMENT

Crazy Dems want to replace our current Liar in Chief with another Liar in Chief.



Here's the video. She's a liar and only the most myopic of you Dems are denying this.

Didn't she answer your question in the interview? I guess I just don't understand why it's so hard for you to understand that there were multiple stories flying around after the attack and it was difficult to know who was responsible, but it's so easy for you to believe Hillary has lies upon lies upon lies. In public and with the families she stuck with the administration's line. In conversation with her daughter and other country's officials she was more candid.

That's it. I'm sorry, there's no smoking gun here as much as you want there to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Didn't she answer your question in the interview? I guess I just don't understand why it's so hard for you to understand that there were multiple stories flying around after the attack and it was difficult to know who was responsible, but it's so easy for you to believe Hillary has lies upon lies upon lies. In public and with the families she stuck with the administration's line. In conversation with her daughter and other country's officials she was more candid.

That's it. I'm sorry, there's no smoking gun here as much as you want there to be.

Hillary obviously knew the answer right away, because she told her daughter it was terrorists.

That proves she (and the administration) knew which story was the right one. They chose to lie to us about it.
 
Didn't she answer your question in the interview? I guess I just don't understand why it's so hard for you to understand that there were multiple stories flying around after the attack and it was difficult to know who was responsible, but it's so easy for you to believe Hillary has lies upon lies upon lies. In public and with the families she stuck with the administration's line. In conversation with her daughter and other country's officials she was more candid.

That's it. I'm sorry, there's no smoking gun here as much as you want there to be.

So who is lying here, Hillary or the families of the slain?
 
Why does it have to be either? Couldn't she just have been wrong?

Clinton Derangement Syndrome has been pounded into the wingnuts' heads for the past 25 years. It may be beyond hope that they would ever be able to come back to reality and see the facts as they exist in the real world.
 
Not at all, I think it sucks. And I'm not supporting Hillary, either. But at some point you have to realize that in the big picture that is DC politics, this is a drop in the ocean. Why Fox News decided this was THE issue they would focus on is beyond me. Why people have latched onto it doesn't make sense. Yes, she likely stuck with the story for political reasons for longer than she should have. You don't think this happens every day in Washington?

It seems to me that you're cool with it. The 'everybody's doing it' excuse.
 
Why does it have to be either? Couldn't she just have been wrong?

She is categorically saying she never told the families it was a video and the families are saying she categorically did tell them it was a video. Both statements cannot be true ergo one is a lie. Which one is it?
 
She is categorically saying she never told the families it was a video and the families are saying she categorically did tell them it was a video. Both statements cannot be true ergo one is a lie. Which one is it?

I'll go with the ones on Fox News for $1,000, Alex.
 
I'll go with the ones on Fox News for $1,000, Alex.

You are a bigger dope than I've given you credit for if you believe that four separate family members are lying and Hillary is the only one telling the truth.

Gruber appreciates your type.
 
You are a bigger dope than I've given you credit for if you believe that four separate family members are lying and Hillary is the only one telling the truth.

Gruber appreciates your type.

Thanks for the credit. FWIW I'm not caucusing for Hillary. Only way I'll support her is if she wins the nomination, and then only because I believe she's the lesser of two evils at that point, whoever the GOP candidate may be. At least she's not a bigoted piece of sh*t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
That was the most plausible explanation at the time, and was what intelligence sources were saying, and, as Ms Clinton so acurately put it, "what difference does it make?" Seriously, this has got to be one of the stupidest criticism the wingnuts have ever come up with, and that's saying something.
BS and you know it. But keep loving on that old dried up hag!
 
hillary.jpg
 
The lie’s even in her words at the Sept. 14 ceremony: “We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with.”

From the OP's article. They really caught her, except for the fact her statement they quote was 100% factual. I have no idea what she said to the families in private. If she blamed the person that made the video, she would be wrong. But she would have been wrong to do that even if Benghazi was entirely about the video.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT