ADVERTISEMENT

Dakich says Alford to IU "a done deal;" 15 years later, Pierre Pierce continues to haunt Alford

Until this year, Alford wasn't exactly loved by the UCLA fan base. I think that he is a better coach than the results he got at Iowa, but there are better coaches out there. The coach that takes the job better get great results, because a lot of IU fans are delusional. Dakich just likes to talk.
I've heard this a lot, and I honestly don't understand where this is coming from. Yes, IU fans expect to win consistently, but I don't understand how that is unrealistic/delusional. Just a few things that iu has going for it...

1st. State of the art facilities
2nd. Fan support for basketball that will rival any other school
3rd. Largest budget in BIG (by a large amount) for recruiting
4th. A great history (it's getting dusty, but still there)
5th. 9th highest coaching salary and willing to go higher
6th. A state that has ridiculous talent at the high school level

That's just off the top of my head, but I really don't understand why we would be delusional for expecting to have a consistently competitive team?

Full disclosure....I'm a iu fan, but I came here because of the Alford connection. But, also because I've always appreciated and respected your teams and fans.
 
I've heard this a lot, and I honestly don't understand where this is coming from. Yes, IU fans expect to win consistently, but I don't understand how that is unrealistic/delusional. Just a few things that iu has going for it...

1st. State of the art facilities
2nd. Fan support for basketball that will rival any other school
3rd. Largest budget in BIG (by a large amount) for recruiting
4th. A great history (it's getting dusty, but still there)
5th. 9th highest coaching salary and willing to go higher
6th. A state that has ridiculous talent at the high school level

That's just off the top of my head, but I really don't understand why we would be delusional for expecting to have a consistently competitive team?

Full disclosure....I'm a iu fan, but I came here because of the Alford connection. But, also because I've always appreciated and respected your teams and fans.

Alford's a jerk.
 
Alford's a jerk.
I completely agree and will be beyond pissed if he ends up being the coach. If you take his name off of the resume....Crean actually has a better resume. Unfortunately, I have a sick feeling that he's going to get the job strictly because someone is a fan of alford the player.
 
Until Indiana names its coach & as long as they dont until UCLA gets knocked off...Alford is in the picture. Obviously "all" of us are outsiders ... so we are nothing more than speculators.

I'm saying "guessing" Alford to Indiana based on the JayHawk radio show I was listening to when I was in Lawerence, Kansas last week...there was one guy (sorry dont remember his name) who claimed the Alford to Indiana thing was going to happen as soon as UCLA is finished.

His claim was based on Alford's agent.
The reason he gave was Alford wants to come home...pure & simple. Indiana also was not happy with so many Indiana recruits going elsewhere & believe SA has the contacts in the state. One of the higher ranked recruits going to UCLA is from Indiana.

So...we will see. Really doesnt matter much to me...he failed as our coach to take our program to that higher level that was talked about when he got hired here. Anyone can blame it on other factors....but when we were losing in the B1G in 2002 with the likes of Recker & Evans...a red flag ran right up the flag pole.

Im sure he is a better coach today as a 52 year old then when he started here..17/18 years ago.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jace46555
I've heard this a lot, and I honestly don't understand where this is coming from. Yes, IU fans expect to win consistently, but I don't understand how that is unrealistic/delusional. Just a few things that iu has going for it...

1st. State of the art facilities
2nd. Fan support for basketball that will rival any other school
3rd. Largest budget in BIG (by a large amount) for recruiting
4th. A great history (it's getting dusty, but still there)
5th. 9th highest coaching salary and willing to go higher
6th. A state that has ridiculous talent at the high school level

That's just off the top of my head, but I really don't understand why we would be delusional for expecting to have a consistently competitive team?

Full disclosure....I'm a iu fan, but I came here because of the Alford connection. But, also because I've always appreciated and respected your teams and fans.

So, now we know how Tan Tommie kept them coming, even when scholarships weren't available.:rolleyes:
 
Part of me (a large part) is anxious for this to happen. Not that I want to see Alford get his dream job, no. I want to see him get his dream job, then fall flat on his face. The Big Ten isn't the PAC 12. He very well may lock-down the state of Indiana as to recruiting, but he'll need more than that to compete. Three or four years of failure at IU and Alford will have no where to go but down.

I don't want him to fall on his face. I want him to be horribly mediocre/average. I want disappointment with just enough hope that they have to chew on firing a favorite son for a long time.
 
So, now we know how Tan Tommie kept them coming, even when scholarships weren't available.:rolleyes:
Crean was an awkward individual and a horrible coach, but he wasn't a cheater imo. Besides, after the whole Sampson scandal, I think the school has taken a lot of steps to ensure that didn't happen.

But, it always amazed me with the resources at his disposal that he didn't do better. After Yogi's class completely bombed I think he decided then that he was done recruiting the state of Indiana. Which was a horrible decision with the crazy amount of talent in that state at the high school level.
 
I don't want him to fall on his face. I want him to be horribly mediocre/average. I want disappointment with just enough hope that they have to chew on firing a favorite son for a long time.
That's the worst part about hiring hint imo. It will be impossible to fire him if he doesn't do well. Short of a scandal like PP, if he's hired iu will be stuck with him for at least 10 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkifann
Crean was an awkward individual and a horrible coach, but he wasn't a cheater imo. Besides, after the whole Sampson scandal, I think the school has taken a lot of steps to ensure that didn't happen.

But, it always amazed me with the resources at his disposal that he didn't do better. After Yogi's class completely bombed I think he decided then that he was done recruiting the state of Indiana. Which was a horrible decision with the crazy amount of talent in that state at the high school level.
IU has had players. Crean just didn't know what to do with them.
 
Until Indiana names its coach & as long as they dont until UCLA gets knocked off...Alford is in the picture. Obviously "all" of us are outsiders ... so we are nothing more than speculators.

I'm saying "guessing" Alford to Indiana based on the JayHawk radio show I was listening to when I was in Lawerence, Kansas last week...there was one guy (sorry dont remember his name) who claimed the Alford to Indiana thing was going to happen as soon as UCLA is finished.

His claim was based on Alford's agent.
The reason he gave was Alford wants to come home...pure & simple. Indiana also was not happy with so many Indiana recruits going elsewhere & believe SA has the contacts in the state. One of the higher ranked recruits going to UCLA is from Indiana.

So...we will see. Really doesnt matter much to me...he failed as our coach to take our program to that higher level that was talked about when he got hired here. Anyone can blame it on other factors....but when we were losing in the B1G in 2002 with the likes of Recker & Evans...a red flag ran right up the flag pole.

Im sure he is a better coach today as a 52 year old then when he started here..17/18 years ago.

18 years ago we hired him. Remember his young sons putting up shots at CHA? Now one of them is graduating from college!
 
Crean was an awkward individual and a horrible coach, but he wasn't a cheater imo. Besides, after the whole Sampson scandal, I think the school has taken a lot of steps to ensure that didn't happen.

But, it always amazed me with the resources at his disposal that he didn't do better. After Yogi's class completely bombed I think he decided then that he was done recruiting the state of Indiana. Which was a horrible decision with the crazy amount of talent in that state at the high school level.

I dont think Crean decided he was done recruiting the state of Indiana....I think a number of the states' high school coaches were done with Crean...at least that is what I've read.

This is the single biggest reason for the firing & the single biggest reason Indiana would bring back Alford. Alford comes in and gets 5 star Wilkes right under the nose of Indiana...huge impact.

I think Alford returns especially if he can bring Wilkes with him.
 
18 years ago we hired him. Remember his young sons putting up shots at CHA? Now one of them is graduating from college!

Yep in his press conference he basically said "I want to leave a legacy right here at Iowa"...he believed right then that Iowa would embrace for not what he would accomplish but for who he was. I'm Steve Alford.

I was excited..I'll admit it.
I also was excited after he won the BTT in 2001,,especially in that we lost Luke Recker...a lot of the fan base was....Carver was hopping.

The first red flag to me was B1G 2002...you got Evans & Recker and you go 5-11 in the B1G Ten?..that year we started to see some issues.

Speaking of Recker he is at most Iowa games along with his kids...the guy is always approachable. Always smiles..even with those who just come up to him. Good guy.
 
Well Dakich did broker the deal for Steve to go from Iowa to New Mexico so he may be in the know.
 
Do you hear this Dodgerhawki? Now what did I say?
I'll concede that someone may have whispered in Dakich's ear to retract what he said and then to shut his big fat mouth, but the point remains that Dakich has retracted what he said meaning he didn't know what he was talking about. The ball is in your court and we'll see what happens next. Oh, and Alford has six new recruits coming in next year and the Ball brother is the lowest ranked of them all. He has two 5 star recruits, three 4 star recruits and the Ball Kid. I'm guessing that he expects some to leave early as he has only 3 seniors departing. The other three new recruits have to displace some existing members. That means Ball, Leaf and one other players is leaving or transferring. That leaves a nucleus of Welch, Holiday, Anigbogu, and Goloman. He replaces those that are lost with the 17th, 24th, 34th, 61st and the 90th ranked recruits along with the Ball brother. The thing is that all of those recruits are 6'7'' except the 5 star 6'1'' guard and the 6'5'' Ball kid. They will compliment the four kids who are between 7'0'' and 6'10'' that come back with experience. Alford is not going to leave because of the talent in his cupboard. But if he does he'll probably take at least one kid with him,the 5 star , 6'7'' 17th rated recruit who lives in Indy.

No doubt Dakich runs his mouth more than he should. Him "retracting" what he said doesn't make it more or less true than it was before he said it. If I inferred or said you were wrong, not my intent. I was just saying Dakich is fairly connected to IU and to Alford. He was heavily involved in connecting Alford to the New Mexico job when he left Iowa.

The more time that goes on and Indiana does not name a coach makes me think it is Alford. I suppose Donovan is an option, but I can't see them waiting for the NBA playoffs to end to replace the coach. There is little doubt about the talent level he's had at UCLA, and is slated to come in. He's set up to keep winning there.
 
I think someone at IU or maybe even Alford himself told Dakich to keep quite and go back on what he said until UCLA loses cause he isn't doing anyone any favors. Kind of off topic but Dakich made a fool of himself few days ago getting into a twitter spat with Rob Howe and Jon Miller after they called him out for his ridiculous claim that he "brokered" the deal for Alford to New Mexico on ESPN. His claim was Alford left mainly cause NM had better fan support. Howe pointed out how before he left Iowa's attendance was just as good and maybe, just maybe the Pierce fallout with the fan base had something to do with it. Dakich just responded back with childish classless remarks.
 
Yep in his press conference he basically said "I want to leave a legacy right here at Iowa"...he believed right then that Iowa would embrace for not what he would accomplish but for who he was. I'm Steve Alford.

I was excited..I'll admit it.
I also was excited after he won the BTT in 2001,,especially in that we lost Luke Recker...a lot of the fan base was....Carver was hopping.

The first red flag to me was B1G 2002...you got Evans & Recker and you go 5-11 in the B1G Ten?..that year we started to see some issues.

Speaking of Recker he is at most Iowa games along with his kids...the guy is always approachable. Always smiles..even with those who just come up to him. Good guy.

I wasn't happy that Dr. Tom was run out, but I did separate Davis being pushed out from Alford being hired. I was excited initially. I lived in Philly at the time and went to MSG when Iowa beat UConn. Then the run-up after getting Recker before injuries that year followed by the BTT win. Then the 5-11 season referenced above and the Pierre Pierce garbage. There were a lot of warning signs. He didn't care about Iowa history when he called Ronnie Lester to get Recker to wear Alford's #12. I never got the feeling that he ever embraced Iowa's history. It's not IU's history, but it's not 100 years of garbage, either. I was a fan who quickly got the feeling that Steve Alford was in the business of selling Steve Alford first and Iowa Basketball as something glorious he created. All of that made it really hard to take the finished product.

My view is that Iowa paid a lot of money so that Alford could get his on-the-job training.
 
If I were the IU search committee, Greg Marshall would be at the top of my list. Alford would dig them an attitude hole that it would take them a decade to crawl out of. He's a much better fit with UCLA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unIowa
Crean won 2 B1G Championships in the last 5 years and that was not good enough for IU fans. Crazy. At the same time, it would be frustrating to be B1G champs one year, and at the bottom of the standings the very next.

I almost feel bad for Crean (almost) that he got fired this year, the guy has two lottery type players go down and it totally changed their season.
 
Yep in his press conference he basically said "I want to leave a legacy right here at Iowa"...he believed right then that Iowa would embrace for not what he would accomplish but for who he was. I'm Steve Alford.

I was excited..I'll admit it.
I also was excited after he won the BTT in 2001,,especially in that we lost Luke Recker...a lot of the fan base was....Carver was hopping.

The first red flag to me was B1G 2002...you got Evans & Recker and you go 5-11 in the B1G Ten?..that year we started to see some issues.

Speaking of Recker he is at most Iowa games along with his kids...the guy is always approachable. Always smiles..even with those who just come up to him. Good guy.

And we beat #1 UConn in his first season; I remember Dickie V going crazy, saying that Alford could really, really coach! LOL
 
No doubt Dakich runs his mouth more than he should. Him "retracting" what he said doesn't make it more or less true than it was before he said it. If I inferred or said you were wrong, not my intent. I was just saying Dakich is fairly connected to IU and to Alford. He was heavily involved in connecting Alford to the New Mexico job when he left Iowa.

The more time that goes on and Indiana does not name a coach makes me think it is Alford. I suppose Donovan is an option, but I can't see them waiting for the NBA playoffs to end to replace the coach. There is little doubt about the talent level he's had at UCLA, and is slated to come in. He's set up to keep winning there.

I wonder if he retracted in order to take the heat off Steve; talk about a huge distraction for him and UCLA as they prepare for Kentucky

I think he leaves UCLA, even if he somehow wins a national championship; they never embraced him and probably never will

And I agree; I think this might already be a done deal. IU hasn't named a coach because the coach they have lined up is still coaching his team in the NCAA Tournament.
 
The older I get the less of a good idea I think it is to go back and coach at your Alma mater...especially if you are an iconic type of player. You have one chance to bolster your iconic standing and so many many chances to have it completely tarnished.

To me it really doesn't look to be worth the risk.
 
UCLA to Indiana would be a step down imo. Why would anyone prefer Bloomington over LA? Much easier to recruit, especially after the run this year. Two more Ball kids coming in and a weaker conference; UCLA should own College BBall west of the Mississippi.

I hope he comes to IU and I wouldn't be shocked, but I think it would be a huge mistake. Of course, IND will offer much more than UCLA pays.
 
I wasn't happy that Dr. Tom was run out, but I did separate Davis being pushed out from Alford being hired. I was excited initially. I lived in Philly at the time and went to MSG when Iowa beat UConn. Then the run-up after getting Recker before injuries that year followed by the BTT win. Then the 5-11 season referenced above and the Pierre Pierce garbage. There were a lot of warning signs. He didn't care about Iowa history when he called Ronnie Lester to get Recker to wear Alford's #12. I never got the feeling that he ever embraced Iowa's history. It's not IU's history, but it's not 100 years of garbage, either. I was a fan who quickly got the feeling that Steve Alford was in the business of selling Steve Alford first and Iowa Basketball as something glorious he created. All of that made it really hard to take the finished product.

My view is that Iowa paid a lot of money so that Alford could get his on-the-job training.

I could not agree anymore about your last line of Alford got a lot of his on the job training here at Iowa. As much as some of us, myself included, don't care for him he is probably a better coach now then he was when he left 10 years ago. Love for him to come back to Big 10 make things more interesting.
 
I wasn't happy that Dr. Tom was run out, but I did separate Davis being pushed out from Alford being hired. I was excited initially. I lived in Philly at the time and went to MSG when Iowa beat UConn. Then the run-up after getting Recker before injuries that year followed by the BTT win. Then the 5-11 season referenced above and the Pierre Pierce garbage. There were a lot of warning signs. He didn't care about Iowa history when he called Ronnie Lester to get Recker to wear Alford's #12. I never got the feeling that he ever embraced Iowa's history. It's not IU's history, but it's not 100 years of garbage, either. I was a fan who quickly got the feeling that Steve Alford was in the business of selling Steve Alford first and Iowa Basketball as something glorious he created. All of that made it really hard to take the finished product.

My view is that Iowa paid a lot of money so that Alford could get his on-the-job training.
Every school does that when they hire from the lower ranks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtown66
Part of me (a large part) is anxious for this to happen. Not that I want to see Alford get his dream job, no. I want to see him get his dream job, then fall flat on his face. The Big Ten isn't the PAC 12. He very well may lock-down the state of Indiana as to recruiting, but he'll need more than that to compete. Three or four years of failure at IU and Alford will have no where to go but down.

NO ONE is locking down the state of Indiana. There are entirely too many good programs in, and immediately surrounding, the state. The concentration of top programs in the triangle between Indianapolis, Cincinnati, and Louisville is unrivaled
 
Every school does that when they hire from the lower ranks.

I realize that, but it adds to my frustration. He was sold as "next level", but it mostly turned out to be all about Steve....and after the early BTT run, Iowa paid him handsomely in order to keep him from bolting should the IU job come open.
 
I wonder if SA's family would still like the idea of coming back to Indy? I think it would take mega $$ to get him to leave UCLA.
 
I wonder if SA's family would still like the idea of coming back to Indy? I think it would take mega $$ to get him to leave UCLA.

There is literally a giant, cast of his shoe at the Indiana high school basketball Hall of Fame, in his hometown of New Castle -- 45 minutes east of Indianapolis.

huge-shoe-near-the-parking.jpg


Not to mention, even if he didn't get a raise at IU (he will), the cost of living difference on his current salary is 152% in Indy. So I'm going to go ahead and say you are probably not right
 
From CBS Sports.com:


UCLA’s Steve Alford, Baylor’s Scott Drew, Butler’s Chris Holtmann, Xavier’s Chris Mack, Wichita State’s Gregg Marshall or Dayton’s Archie Miller. One of those men will be Indiana’s next coach, I’d bet. And any of them would be a good hire. So, absolutely, I think things will ultimately end well with Indiana’s search.

If you heard Glass’ press conference last week, you know he yearns for Indiana’s storied past -- which is why Alford, a former Indiana player who led the Hoosiers to the 1987 national championship, makes sense. And I could totally see UCLA lowering his $7 million buyout to a reasonable number that allows him to walk home. Remember, less than a year ago, UCLA fans were flying “Fire Alford” banners above campus . And while this remarkable season would get most coaches back into good graces with their fans, UCLA supporters seem to credit Lonzo Ball more than Alford for the Bruins’ success. So if UCLA slips even a little when Ball leaves after this season, Alford will be right back where he was a year ago. Thus, for those reasons and more, Alford to Indiana is plausible provided Glass really does desire a strong connection to Indiana’s past. And, again, I wouldn’t be surprised if UCLA, in the spirit of starting fresh, would be willing to do what it has to do to make it happen.

Now let’s run through the other options.

Drew makes sense because he’s the architect of the greatest rebuilding job in college basketball history -- and a Butler graduate who worked at Valparaiso. So he has ties to the area, which is something Glass said matters. Holtmann makes sense because he’s been unreal at Butler. And hiring him would weaken an in-state rival, which could be a strong strategic move. Mack makes sense because he’s a consistent winner with a great personality who has made seven NCAA Tournaments and four Sweet 16s in eight years as a head coach. The only issue is that Indiana would be asking him to leave his hometown and alma mater, and that sometimes makes coaches hesitant to pull the trigger. Marshall makes sense because he’s a super-confident coach who has built Wichita State into a monster and is unafraid to speak his mind, which longtime IU fans raised on Bob Knight must appreciate. But he’s set to have a top-10 team next preseason. Coaches don’t usually abandon those, it should be noted. And Archie Miller makes sense because he’s considered among the brightest young stars, if not the brightest young star, in all of coaching. If Indiana doesn’t hire him now some other great Power-5 school will someday.

Bottom line, five bucks says one of those men is Indiana’s next coach.

There’s no way all six of them say no.

It’s just a matter of when one of them says yes.

Full story: http://www.cbssports.com/college-ba...ng-search-boils-down-to-these-six-candidates/
 
From CBS Sports.com:


UCLA’s Steve Alford, Baylor’s Scott Drew, Butler’s Chris Holtmann, Xavier’s Chris Mack, Wichita State’s Gregg Marshall or Dayton’s Archie Miller. One of those men will be Indiana’s next coach, I’d bet. And any of them would be a good hire. So, absolutely, I think things will ultimately end well with Indiana’s search.

If you heard Glass’ press conference last week, you know he yearns for Indiana’s storied past -- which is why Alford, a former Indiana player who led the Hoosiers to the 1987 national championship, makes sense. And I could totally see UCLA lowering his $7 million buyout to a reasonable number that allows him to walk home. Remember, less than a year ago, UCLA fans were flying “Fire Alford” banners above campus . And while this remarkable season would get most coaches back into good graces with their fans, UCLA supporters seem to credit Lonzo Ball more than Alford for the Bruins’ success. So if UCLA slips even a little when Ball leaves after this season, Alford will be right back where he was a year ago. Thus, for those reasons and more, Alford to Indiana is plausible provided Glass really does desire a strong connection to Indiana’s past. And, again, I wouldn’t be surprised if UCLA, in the spirit of starting fresh, would be willing to do what it has to do to make it happen.

Now let’s run through the other options.

Drew makes sense because he’s the architect of the greatest rebuilding job in college basketball history -- and a Butler graduate who worked at Valparaiso. So he has ties to the area, which is something Glass said matters. Holtmann makes sense because he’s been unreal at Butler. And hiring him would weaken an in-state rival, which could be a strong strategic move. Mack makes sense because he’s a consistent winner with a great personality who has made seven NCAA Tournaments and four Sweet 16s in eight years as a head coach. The only issue is that Indiana would be asking him to leave his hometown and alma mater, and that sometimes makes coaches hesitant to pull the trigger. Marshall makes sense because he’s a super-confident coach who has built Wichita State into a monster and is unafraid to speak his mind, which longtime IU fans raised on Bob Knight must appreciate. But he’s set to have a top-10 team next preseason. Coaches don’t usually abandon those, it should be noted. And Archie Miller makes sense because he’s considered among the brightest young stars, if not the brightest young star, in all of coaching. If Indiana doesn’t hire him now some other great Power-5 school will someday.

Bottom line, five bucks says one of those men is Indiana’s next coach.

There’s no way all six of them say no.

It’s just a matter of when one of them says yes.

Full story: http://www.cbssports.com/college-ba...ng-search-boils-down-to-these-six-candidates/


There is no way Drew is even considered in my opinion. He has a pretty shady rep and after the Sampson they want no part of that type coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goodbyebobby
Dakich announcing that Alford going to Indiana is a sure thing tells you all you need to know about Dakich. Alford is trying to win a NC at UCLA and Dakich throws gas on the fire. No sympathy for Alford, but that is a dick move IMO.
 
1st. State of the art facilities
2nd. Fan support for basketball that will rival any other school
3rd. Largest budget in BIG (by a large amount) for recruiting
4th. A great history (it's getting dusty, but still there)
5th. 9th highest coaching salary and willing to go higher
6th. A state that has ridiculous talent at the high school level
It's difficult to believe, that with all of these amenities, Crean's toolbox was missing a wrench or two.

It came down to coaching and production. And, from what I have heard, his demeanor with his players.

IMO Alford will stay at UCLA. He has a good thing going there now after mediocrity.
 
It's difficult to believe, that with all of these amenities, Crean's toolbox was missing a wrench or two.

It came down to coaching and production. And, from what I have heard, his demeanor with his players.

IMO Alford will stay at UCLA. He has a good thing going there now after mediocrity.
I think he stays at UCLA. California in January versus Indiana in January. In reality how much does his Indiana legacy mean these days? It really did not help him at Iowa. Maybe a little bit of him is afraid to go to his dream job because he is fearful he might not be that successful. Would his ego be able to deal with that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawksfor3
If I were the IU search committee, Greg Marshall would be at the top of my list. Alford would dig them an attitude hole that it would take them a decade to crawl out of. He's a much better fit with UCLA.
Would Marshall leave WSU? I'm sure he's had numerous options before. Sounds like WSU is getting set to join the AAC for tougher competition.
 
From the Indy Star:

The deafening noise about IU and Alford...up to a point, ...makes sense. Alford is one of the last connections to Bob Knight and the good old days: high school IndyStar Mr. Basketball winner, college All-American, Olympic gold medalist on a U.S. team coached by Knight. To a certain part of the IU fan base, an older part, he’s Moby Dick.

To another part of the fan base, he’s, um, well. Put it this way: Alford isn’t just old news. He’s bad news. To them, the only thing on Alford’s coaching resume that even whispers “IU candidate” is his playing career. Which isn’t on his coaching resume at all.

More than that, the Pierre Pierce scandal when Alford was at Iowa — Alford’s defense of Pierce, his best player in 2002, went beyond loyalty and crossed into victim intimidation — is a horrible look. It was 15 years ago, and UCLA was willing to look past it, but there are IU fans urging Glass and the board of trustees not to do the same.

For every text or email I have from an IU grad in favor of Alford — one IU manager for Knight told me “the 20-plus former players/managers that I stay in touch with really want Alford!!!” — I can show you another one like this from an IU Law grad now working as a district attorney out west:

To the Board of Trustees of Indiana University:

I write to you today as an alumnus urging you all to exert your enormous influence at Indiana University to discourage and prevent the potential hiring of Steve Alford. … I base this plea not on Mr. Alford’s lackluster coaching record, but rather on his off-the-court record. …His transgressions at the University of Iowa are not fitting with our values and priorities as a university.

Since Glass fired Crean on Thursday, Alford has emerged as the hottest IU candidate. Glass fueled that by listing three candidate criteria, criteria that fit Alford and very few others, and saying all three factors deserve a “double check plus”: Being from Indiana. Being from IU. Being a head coach.

The Alford-to-IU noise is so loud, coaches around the country are telling me what they’re hearing: They expect Adidas — IU has a $54 million contract with Adidas through 2024 — to pay Alford’s $7.8 million buyout at UCLA. It too was an Adidas school when UCLA hired Alford in 2013, but the Bruins recently left Adidas for a 15-year, $280 million deal with Under Armour. Adidas would love to return the favor and help Alford leave UCLA. That’s what other coaches are hearing, and telling me.

How hot is Alford’s IU candidacy? So hot that WFNI's Dan Dakich told me in a text message Saturday — with Alford’s third-seeded Bruins preparing to play No. 6 Cincinnati on Sunday — that “the deal (with) Alford is done.”

The whole story: http://www.indystar.com/story/sport...lford-noise-deafening-and-kind-dumb/99361610/


UCLA would be the ones coming out ahead here. That is for certain. They get a bunch of cash and can make a better hire without firing someone and paying out millions... Although, Alford is getting a young, loaded team right out the gates. Same as what he had at UCLA.

I wonder if IU fires Alford for a one and done performance, with there best player, a lottery pick, out for the remainder of the season? I guess I really do not care. Enjoy the fishbowl Stevie!
 
Would Marshall leave WSU? I'm sure he's had numerous options before. Sounds like WSU is getting set to join the AAC for tougher competition.
Wasn't Marshall a finalist for the Texas job recently? He'd leave WSU for the right offer.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT