Democractivists ... propagandists or journalists ??

[Champ_Kind_whammy]

Billy Bush Tells Tucker Carlson ABC News Built 75 Person Unit Team Dedicated to Attacking President Trump “Get him at all costs" (Video) | The Gateway Pundit | by Margaret Flavin

Billy Bush reveals shocking details about a dedicated ABC News team aimed at undermining President Trump. Discover the implications of media activism in this eye-opening discussion with Tucker Carlson.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Tucker Carlson: You said this was the beginning of Trump derangement syndrome. Did you sense that at NBC?

Billy Bush: Oh, God. Absolutely. I mean, anything. Remember this, over at ABC News, at the same time when Trump became President, they launched a 70… they built a 75-person investigative unit. I know the guy who was head of it, dedicated to anything negative on Trump. Find stuff on him and get him out.

This is not journalism.

This is not news.

It is activism.

When you’re calling it journalism, it’s total activism.

By the way, when NBC does the shi**y thing that they did, ABC and CBS don’t call it out. They don’t say, Hey, you’re competing with each other. I would want to pound my competitor. ‘Look what you did. That was dirty’ because all of them would have done it, too, probably. You know what I mean? They all shared that mission.

 

[Colonoscopy]

Let's think about banning this handle.

We have the same person posting with two handles because they hit the daily post limit. Free speech is fine, but these guys clutter up the message board with junk and stifle discussion.

Unfettered free speech is no good on a message board if the quality of discussion declines to a substantial degree. I've seen it happen -- eventually people start leaving and the board dies.

Pruning needs to happen.

 

[RicoSuave102954]

Let's think about banning this handle.

We have the same person posting with two handles because they hit the daily post limit. Free speech is fine, but these guys clutter up the message board with junk and stifle discussion.

Unfettered free speech is no good on a message board if the quality of discussion declines to a substantial degree. I've seen it happen -- eventually people start leaving and the board dies.

Pruning needs to happen.

Translation = He doesn't want to hear about the left doing bad things.

 

[Scruddy]

All they do is lie.

 

[Colonoscopy]

Translation = He doesn't want to hear about the left doing bad things.

lol, you idiot. I think California screwed up on the homeless issue. I think some of their laws on crime can be an issue.

I even think DEI can be an issue -- in the affirmative action sense, which is how you're talking about it -- if A) it's severe enough, and B) frequent enough.

However, you haven't offered good evidence for this at all. The lesbian chief officer has good qualifications if you look at her resume, the fire-departments response to the fires has been fine, and the firefighter demographics are exactly what you'd figure they'd be -- 97% male.

The main issues were city infrastructure... and it likely has been an issue for decades.

And besides all that -- the city infrastructure and fire-fighting was very unlikely to be able to control the fire given its nature.

 

[Colonoscopy]

View embedded media

All they do is lie.

lol, the list from MAGA world is about 1000x longer if you were to total it up.

 

[Colonoscopy]

View embedded media

All they do is lie.

And many of those weren't widely held as truths. Something like the pee-tape never was anything more than a rumor.

 

[Scruddy]

And many of those weren't widely held as truths. Something like the pee-tape never was anything more than a rumor.

Oh yes they were lmfao every one of the top 12 listed (I quit going back through it at that point) were 100% dem talking points/outright lies.

 

[RicoSuave102954]

lol, you idiot. I think California screwed up on the homeless issue. I think some of their laws on crime can be an issue.

I even think DEI can be an issue -- in the affirmative action sense, which is how you're talking about it -- if A) it's severe enough, and B) frequent enough.

However, you haven't offered good evidence for this at all. The lesbian chief officer has good qualifications if you look at her resume, the fire-departments response to the fires has been fine, and the firefighter demographics are exactly what you'd figure they'd be -- 97% male.

The main issues were city infrastructure... and it likely has been an issue for decades.

And besides all that -- the city infrastructure and fire-fighting was very unlikely to be able to control the fire given its nature.

People with no fire fighting experience saved their homes using pool water and lawn sprinklers and you're trying to tell me professionals couldn't control the fire?

 

[Colonoscopy]

Oh yes they were lmfao every one of the top 12 listed (I quit going back through it at that point) were 100% dem talking points/outright lies.

Some of those were really meaningless.

Arguing over the definition of an insurrection -- terrible whatever you want to call it. Insurrection is debatable.

Trump may have colluded -- there wasn't definitive proof that he did. Some sources were overly certain in their speculation, but speculation was completely reasonable.

Drink bleach? He didn't say bleach, but he suggested (after they mentioned bleach as a diss-infectant) that perhaps some disinfectant could be injected into the body. Which on the heals of talking about bleach as a disinfectant, was a terrible terrible idea. And would make plenty of people question whether or not he was talking about bleach.

Here's what he said:

"“A question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world,” Trump began, clearly thinking the question himself, “So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that, too. It sounds interesting. And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that.”

 

[Colonoscopy]

People with no fire fighting experience saved their homes using pool water and lawn sprinklers and you're trying to tell me professionals couldn't control the fire?

All of the fires occurring at once? At the beginning when there was 60+ mph winds? No.

They've never been anywhere close resource wise to being able to handle 100s of houses on fire concurrently. I don't think any city in the US is close to capable that way.

 

[Colonoscopy]

Some of those were really meaningless.

Arguing over the definition of an insurrection -- terrible whatever you want to call it. Insurrection is debatable.

Trump may have colluded -- there wasn't definitive proof that he did. Some sources were overly certain in their speculation, but speculation was completely reasonable.

Drink bleach? He didn't say bleach, but he suggested (after they mentioned bleach as a diss-infectant) that perhaps some disinfectant could be injected into the body. Which on the heals of talking about bleach as a disinfectant, was a terrible terrible idea. And would make plenty of people question whether or not he was talking about bleach.

Here's what he said:

"“A question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world,” Trump began, clearly thinking the question himself, “So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that, too. It sounds interesting. And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that.”

He's suggesting you try bleach or something like that in the lungs. Try that experiment.

And he's president. Talking to millions of people.

Kind retard. @DarnelThomas your boy is a retard.

 

[Colonoscopy]

Now I'm just gonna spam your thread a bit.

 

[Ronnie_B]

Translation = He doesn't want to hear about the left doing bad things.

Bingo

 

[RicoSuave102954]

All of the fires occurring at once? At the beginning when there was 60+ mph winds? No.

They've never been anywhere close resource wise to being able to handle 100s of houses on fire concurrently. I don't think any city in the US is close to capable that way.

100's of homes didn't instantaneously combust into flames at the same time. In fact, the fires burnt for some time up in the hills prior to the fire spreading to the homes below.

What really turned the tide in the battle to save Palisades was broken fire hydrants hundreds of broken fire hydrants.

 

[Colonoscopy]

100's of homes didn't instantaneously combust into flames at the same time. In fact, the fires burnt for some time up in the hills prior to the fire spreading to the homes below.

What really turned the tide in the battle to save Palisades was broken fire hydrants hundreds of broken fire hydrants.

No. Most of the losses were in the first 48 hours. I've seen estimates up to 10k structures.

100s of concurrent fires. Winds were carry embers down into the city from the hills.

This is what they looked like early on, notice the wind. You'd have to be hanging around the structure just as the fire started, basically, to get it. A total mess once it takes off. You weren't stopping the below with sprinklers or hoses.

Take a look:

 

[alaskanseminole]

Now I'm just gonna spam your thread a bit.

Same:

The Gateway Pundit is widely regarded as having a strong right-wing bias. It's known for publishing content that aligns with conservative views and often promotes conspiratorial narratives, especially in the realms of politics, elections, and social issues. It has been criticized by media watchdogs for a lack of rigorous journalistic standards, sensationalism, and selective use of sources that support its ideological stance.

Many independent fact-checking organizations, such as Media Bias/Fact Check and Ad Fontes Media, rate the site as having a high bias toward the right, with a tendency to publish unverified or misleading information. They have often flagged its articles for misleading headlines or unsupported claims, particularly around election-related topics.