ADVERTISEMENT

DOGE Quietly Deletes the 5 Biggest Spending Cuts It Celebrated Last Week

Yes, it is.


My understanding is they are currently looking at all spending. Actual money saved and cuts will be decided by Trump.
The cuts are way overstated. They’re not supporting with evidence the cuts they’re bragging about. A large percentage of the canceled contracts will provide no savings. It’s not an audit or review being done by experts.
It’s ham fisted and political. Opportunity squandered. Going to end up being peanuts on the debt. If we were serious about efficiency and government spending. Medicare, Social Security, and DOD. Would be the focus not these rounding errors essentially.
 
Last edited:
There cuts are way overstated. They’re not supporting with evidence the cuts they’re bragging about. A large percentage of the canceled contracts will provide no savings. It’s not an audit or review being done by experts.
It’s ham fisted and political. Opportunity squandered. Going to end up being peanuts on the debt. If we were serious about efficiency and government spending. Medicare, Social Security, and DOD. Would be the focus not these rounding errors essentially.
There will be a day we see the cuts that is when they will be "stated".


We could always produce them and then reduce them by 800k every month like thr Biden job era but I like this approach better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: libbity bibbity
The "big rush" is knowing that once we hit 2026 the brakes known as bureaucracy are going to get slammed on. Trump learned from the first 4. He learned to not trust DC and nothing there happens fast.
I don't have a problem with moving fast in analysis per se. But the slop presented to the public -- quite possibly for performative aims -- is hard to justify.

And instead of trying to work with congress to cut spending -- what your analysis could be going towards -- they're making a bunch of unilateral moves that are likely to be shot down in court. Which could further erode public support.

(they're very unlikely to be allowed to cut congressionally approved spending)
 
There will be a day we see the cuts that is when they will be "stated".


We could always produce them and then reduce them by 800k every month like thr Biden job era but I like this approach better.
Naw, they’ll use alternative facts and bull shit. It’s what Musk does when he’s wrong. Musk is not infallible. He’s a great entrepreneur that smells an opportunity and latches onto brilliant people and rides them into the ground. Then moves onto another. Not any different than Steve Jobs or others of previous eras.
 
I don't have a problem with moving fast in analysis per se. But the slop presented to the public -- quite possibly for performative aims -- is hard to justify.

And instead of trying to work with congress to cut spending -- what your analysis could be going towards -- they're making a bunch of unilateral moves that are likely to be shot down in court. Which could further erode public support.

(they're very unlikely to be allowed to cut congressionally approved spending)
I too wish this was a little.less talk and more showing up one time with a big stick but it's 2025 and I don't call the plays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeyetraveler
Naw, they’ll use alternative facts and bull shit. It’s what Musk does when he’s wrong. Musk is not infallible. He’s a great entrepreneur that smells an opportunity and latches onto brilliant people and rides them into the ground. Then moves onto another. Not any different than Steve Jobs or others of previous eras.
Time will tell sir.
 
Guys who bat 400 make the hall of fame.


I'm not the type to bitch about the outliers when I can see the total project is doing well.
Is it?…/or……..
It is?
Typical “Trump” hand print all over this……,lots of noise and wind…..but once the substance is affirmed, it will be much to do about very little. Like most everything else Trump related.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Is it?…/or……..
It is?
Typical “Trump” hand print all over this……,lots of noise and wind…..but once the substance is affirmed, it will be much to do about very little. Like most everything else Trump related.
Well good news, thr last guy didn't do it, and anyone will a brain will tell you the government is a giant money pit, so, here we are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: libbity bibbity
Last week, Elon Musk’s government cost-slashing initiative, dubbed the Department of Government Efficiency, posted an online “wall of receipts,” celebrating how much it had saved by canceling federal contracts.
Now the organization, which is also known as the U.S. DOGE Service, has deleted all of the five biggest “savings” on that original list, after The New York Times and other media outlets pointed out they were riddled with errors.
The last of the original top five disappeared from the site in the early hours of Tuesday, even as the group claimed in its latest update that its savings to date had increased to $65 billion. The website offered no explanation for why it removed some items or how it arrived at the higher total. Neither the U.S. DOGE Service nor the White House responded to questions Tuesday morning.
The “wall of receipts” is the only public ledger the organization has produced to document its work. The scale of that ledger’s errors — and the misunderstandings and poor quality control that seemed to underlie them — has raised questions about the effort’s broader work, which has led to mass firings and cutbacks across the federal government.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


These were the original five largest savings on its list:
  • An $8 billion cut at Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The actual contract in question was worth $8 million. The mistake seemed to stem from an earlier, erroneous entry in a federal contracting database. But contracting experts said that the service should have known better: ICE’s entire budget is about $8 billion, making it implausible that one contract could be so large. The U.S. DOGE Service adjusted the figure on the site after The Times wrote about it, and said in a post on Mr. Musk’s X platform that it had “always used the correct $8M in its calculations.”
  • Three $655 million cuts at the U.S. Agency for International Development. This was actually a single cut that was erroneously counted three times, as first reported by CBS News. That mistake also seemed to reflect a misunderstanding of the way government contracts work; they sometimes have “ceiling values” far in excess of what will be spent. Experts said this cancellation was unlikely to produce anything close to $655 million in savings even once. Now, the site lists a much smaller savings for these three cancellations: $18 million in total.
  • A $232 million cut at the Social Security Administration. Here, Mr. Musk’s organization appeared to have mistakenly believed that the agency had canceled a huge information technology contract with the defense contracting giant Leidos. Instead, as reported by The Intercept, it had canceled only a tiny piece of it: a $560,000 project to let users mark their gender as “X.” The DOGE site now shows that small cut instead.
Some of the new canceled contracts added this week appear to make some of the same types of errors.
The largest savings on the latest version of its list is a $1.9 billion cut at the Treasury Department. But The Times reported last week that this contract was canceled last fall, when Joseph R. Biden Jr. was president — and when DOGE did not yet exist.

Huh. Who knew that employing a bunch of people in a job they're not trained on would result in a shit ton of huge mistakes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
When auditors behave this way u get Enron just a warning. Don’t but much faith in bull shit artists. This skill would have been in mitt Romney’s wheel house. A bean counting nerd. Not any different than attention whore. With a mental disorder.
You had the ball for 12 of 16 years, talk to your players.
 
There cuts are way overstated. They’re not supporting with evidence the cuts they’re bragging about. A large percentage of the canceled contracts will provide no savings. It’s not an audit or review being done by experts.
It’s ham fisted and political. Opportunity squandered. Going to end up being peanuts on the debt. If we were serious about efficiency and government spending. Medicare, Social Security, and DOD. Would be the focus not these rounding errors essentially.
Whisky is an idiot that only believes what fits his absolutely tiny and narrow world view. I wouldn’t bother trying to reason with him.
 
Whisky is an idiot that only believes what fits his absolutely tiny and narrow world view. I wouldn’t bother trying to reason with him.
I provide links, they provide "they were overstated", you think that guy supplies "reason".


You are a funny guy.



Hope you are well Torbs.
 
This is the shit centrist like myself deal with:





Hbot: Der 40% didn't work



Normal people: 60% did.
We shouldn’t expect better than 40% from our government? To counteract your baseball analogy, 60% is an F in elementary schools in most places.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bierhalter
We shouldn’t expect better than 40% from our government? To counteract your baseball analogy, 60% is an F in elementary schools in most places.
Yeah, and guys who hit .400 go to the HOF.



It isn't about expecting it's about an unending need to bitch. If the left were driving this train you would be all for it, but, because orange man bad, 60% win rate in finding ways our government has been p
dicking our tax dollars is a reason to bitch about the 40% they had an error on.

One of which was as simple as pulling bad data. There was still a savings of millions but not billions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: libbity bibbity
Yeah, and guys who hit .400 go to the HOF.



It isn't about expecting it's about an unending need to bitch. If the left were driving this train you would be all for it, but, because orange man bad, 60% win rate in finding ways our government has been p
dicking our tax dollars is a reason to bitch about the 40% they had an error on.

One of which was as simple as pulling bad data. There was still a savings of millions but not billions.

That’s 100% false.

I’m an accountant and this level of ineptitude would get you fired anywhere and everywhere. It’s just not debatable.
 
I’m still standing by my premise that they will cost the taxpayers more money than they will save.

They really should’ve looked at the cancellation clauses for the contracts they axed.
Donald Trump is pretty good at stiffing people. Now he has the DoJ doing his legal work for free.
Not that they thought of this beforehand, it's just a happy coincidence for incompetent folks in charge these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
This last month has beena level of childless and incompetence that is breathtaking.

I have to believe even MAGAs know how ridiculous it has all been. But they are digging in their heels and defending everything.
How many times this past week have we seen posters like Goldmom repeat the lie that dead people are getting SSN checks?
So, Ciggy can link a story that Trump and Musk lied, but the week of lies proceeding this story have cemented a "truth", for the believers, and the low information voters.
 
Yeah, and guys who hit .400 go to the HOF.



It isn't about expecting it's about an unending need to bitch. If the left were driving this train you would be all for it, but, because orange man bad, 60% win rate in finding ways our government has been p
dicking our tax dollars is a reason to bitch about the 40% they had an error on.

One of which was as simple as pulling bad data. There was still a savings of millions but not billions.
Glad to see you accept such mediocrity in your government. This isn’t baseball, it’s peoples lives.
 
military-last_words-ready_aim_fire-fires-gun-shoot-tbrn341_low.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bierhalter
Not really sure what that was by Jakucionis, but the Hawkeyes have answered with 5 straight.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT