ADVERTISEMENT

Easiest Nonconf Schedule in the Country? Oregon #1; Wisky #2; IU at #8; Georgia #9, Alabama #10

Franisdaman

HB King
Nov 3, 2012
101,617
138,732
113
Heaven, Iowa
I know Iowa fans like to rip on our non conference schedule but take a look at this Top 10 list.

From ESPN.com:


Ranking CFB's easiest nonconference schedules
8:00 AM CT
LINK: http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...wisconsin-badgers-teams-easiest-nonconference

i

  • Chris LowESPN Senior Staff Writer

We were especially hard on those teams:
* Not playing any Power 5 opponents in their nonconference slate
* Padding their schedule with FCS foes
* Not playing any true road games.

Of note, there are three Big Ten teams and three SEC teams on this list, including the two teams -- Alabama and Georgia -- that played in the national championship game a year ago.

So let's look closer at our ranking of the cushiest nonconference schedules for the 2018 season.

i
1. Oregon
Sept. 1 vs. Bowling Green, Sept. 8 vs. Portland State, Sept. 15 vs. San Jose State

Just as Pittsburgh was an easy choice for having the toughest Power 5 nonconference schedule, Oregon is the runaway winner for having the softest nonconference schedule.

Not only do the Ducks have three home games, none of which are against Power 5 opponents, but one of those is against FCS foe Portland State.

And among them, Bowling Green, San Jose State and Portland State won four games last season. So not exactly a murderers' row out of conference for Mario Cristobal in his first season as the Ducks' coach.

2. Wisconsin
i
Aug. 31 vs. Western Kentucky, Sept. 8 vs. New Mexico, Sept. 15 vs. BYU

For the second straight year, Wisconsin doesn't face a nonconference team from a Power 5 conference. The only other two Big Ten teams not playing a Power 5 team out of conference this season are Illinois and Minnesota.

All three of the Badgers' games are also in the comfy confines of Camp Randall Stadium, where they are unbeaten in nonconference games under Paul Chryst. They do take on BYU, but the Cougars are coming off a four-win season and have seen better days.

3. Kansas
i
Sept. 1 vs. Nicholls State, Sept. 8 at Central Michigan, Sept. 15 vs. Rutgers

Given that Kansas has won a total of three games in the past three seasons, it's probably a little much to be picking on whom the Jayhawks play out of conference. After all, they've managed only three conference wins in the past seven seasons.

Still, the triumvirate of Nicholls State, Central Michigan and Rutgers to open the season isn't exactly a grind by any standard, although playing on the road at Central Michigan could prove tricky.

4. Rutgers
i
Sept. 1 vs. Texas State, Sept. 15 at Kansas, Sept. 22 vs. Buffalo

After facing Washington to open the season a year ago, Rutgers replaces the Huskies on its nonconference schedule in 2018 with a trip to Kansas, which ranks exactly one spot ahead of the Scarlet Knights on our list of the easiest Power 5 nonconference schedules.

In part, the Jayhawks and Scarlet Knights have each other to thank for that distinction. It's also worth noting that Rutgers lost to Eastern Michigan last season at home, so MAC foe Buffalo is no gimme.

5. Arkansas
i
Sept. 1 vs. Eastern Illinois, Sept. 8 at Colorado State, Sept. 15 vs. North Texas, Oct. 20 vs. Tulsa

The Razorbacks were originally scheduled to face Michigan the next two seasons, but the Wolverines bought their way out of that series to resume their rivalry with Notre Dame. So Arkansas had to scramble to fill that slot and wound up replacing Michigan with a trip to Colorado State.

This could be a rebuilding season for Mike Bobo and the Rams after some key personnel losses on offense. The Hogs take the SEC medal because they're the only team in the league that won't play a Power 5 nonconference opponent (or Notre Dame) in 2018.

6. Virginia
i
Sept. 1 vs. Richmond, Sept. 8 at Indiana, Sept. 15 vs. Ohio, Nov. 10 vs. Liberty

The ACC's easiest nonconference schedule belongs to a Virginia program entering its third season with Bronco Mendenhall in charge. Had it not been for Liberty reclassifying to the FBS level, the Cavaliers would have two FCS schools on their schedule. They're already playing Richmond, and Liberty will be playing its first season as a provisional FBS member.

The only road trip is to Indiana, which won by 17 points last season in Charlottesville.

7. Washington State
i
Sept. 1 at Wyoming, Sept. 8 vs. San Jose State, Sept. 15 vs. Eastern Washington

For the third straight season, the Cougars don't face a Power 5 team outside the conference in the regular season. Then again, they lost to both Eastern Washington and Boise State in 2016.

Wyoming takes the place of Boise State on the 2018 schedule, and Washington State has to travel to Laramie. Even without Josh Allen, the Cowboys won't be an easy out. Nonetheless, it's a nonconference schedule a lot of teams would take in a heartbeat.

8. Indiana
i
Sept. 1 at FIU, Sept. 8 vs. Virginia, Sept. 15 vs. Ball State

The Hoosiers are looking to break through and get to a bowl game in Tom Allen's second season as head coach. They have the kind of nonconference schedule that should help thanks to a September stretch to open the season that's not all that daunting.

Indiana's only road game outside the Big Ten is at FIU to kick off the season, and Butch Davis has to replace a ton of experience from last year's team. There will be a lot of disappointed Hoosiers if they're not 3-0 going into that Michigan State game at home on Sept. 22.

9. Georgia
i
Sept. 1 vs. Austin Peay, Sept. 15 vs. Middle Tennessee, Nov. 17 vs. UMass, Nov. 24 vs. Georgia Tech

On its way to an SEC championship and appearance in the national title game last season, Georgia played two nonconference games against Power 5 opponents, both on the road. But Notre Dame comes off the schedule this season, and Kirby Smart's club won't have to leave Sanford Stadium for any of its four games out of conference.

Georgia Tech is a rivalry game, and the Yellow Jackets have won each of their past two trips to Athens. Even so, this is a nonconference slate tailor-made for the Dawgs to be 4-0.

10. Alabama
i
Sept. 1 vs. Louisville in Orlando, Florida, Sept. 8 vs. Arkansas State, Sept. 29 vs. Louisiana, Nov. 17 vs. The Citadel

The headliner for Alabama is Louisville in Orlando, but the Cardinals lose one of the most dangerous players in the college game in quarterback Lamar Jackson and return only two starters on defense.

Nick Saban hasn't lost a nonconference game in the regular season since his first year at Alabama in 2007 when the Tide lost to Louisiana Monroe. Hard to see that changing with this schedule.
 
This is good stuff and should be emphasized all season long by the networks and the talking heads. Georgia, Oregon, and Alabama should be ashamed of themselves. It looks like Gary B. and Fran M. put those non-con schedules together. And those three schools, especially the SEC duo, should be blasted for it over and over and over again.

Wisconsin, on the other hand, has been playing some great non-con schedules in recent years, but this year isn't one of them.
 
This is good stuff and should be emphasized all season long by the networks and the talking heads. Georgia, Oregon, and Alabama should be ashamed of themselves. It looks like Gary B. and Fran M. put those non-con schedules together. And those three schools, especially the SEC duo, should be blasted for it over and over and over again.

Wisconsin, on the other hand, has been playing some great non-con schedules in recent years, but this year isn't one of them.
Do we ever see Alabama get blasted? Don't they typically play an FCS team late in the season every year?
 
Do we ever see Alabama get blasted? Don't they typically play an FCS team late in the season every year?

They do play a cupcake late every year. But they also play a tough Power 5 OOC game in Week 1 or 2 every year. Examples: Michigan, Wisc, Penn St, Clemson, VTech, FSU, etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franisdaman
Playing a FCS school in late November is chicken (insert s*** word) just before your biggest game. FCS games need to be played by week #3 (realistically week #1).
 
Glad to see Iowa did not make that list of 10...but I can't help think we'd mostly likely make the next 10.
 
Glad to see Iowa did not make that list of 10...but I can't help think we'd mostly likely make the next 10.
I don't think they would. All 3 non-conference teams won 8 games last year- not often we can say ISU helps our non-conference RPI. The SEC is even worse because they only play 8 conference games and have 4 games to play with
 
  • Like
Reactions: bumpstock
Again for some reason Iowa fans want to complain about things they have no reason to complain about. First off schedules are set years in advance and there is no way of telling years ahead of the game who will be good and who will not. Number 2 .....there are always a bunch of schools that have cake walks early in the season.........because of the reason above. Stop complaining and enjoy the game!
 
SEC always gets a pass because......well....they are in the SEC?

I always think its total BS that now that Big 10, Big 12, PAC 12 all play 9 conference games that SEC and ACC teams that don't play more than 1 power 5 or none don't get ripped on more. 16' only Georgia played 2 power 5 teams. 17' season 3 of 14 SEC teams played 2 power 5 teams. List includes couple Big 10 and PAC 12 schools but look at some of the ACC and SEC teams who play 1 power 5 team and the 3 other non conference games and they are just as weak as Wisconsin or Indiana's opponents. Least Indiana scheduled Virginia who least has chance of being a decent team. Even KU for as bad as they are and could have easily scheduled 3 non power 5 they least tried with having a game vs Rutgers.

In my opinion for the top 10 list I'd place SEC/ACC school like Arkansas who have 4 non power 5 teams on their schedule and immediately put them high on the list and not have any school who plays 9 conference games ahead of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dawgs_04
I always laugh at the people who whine about Iowa’s non-conference schedule and think the Hawks should be loading up on powerhouse opponents.

First of all...very few teams do that. Second, it is not as easy to schedule the top teams as you may think. And finally......since the Hawks usually finish in the 7-8 win range, why make it harder? Especially when they have lost to the likes of Western and Central Michigan, North Dakota State, and often struggle against Iowa State?
 
I always laugh at the people who whine about Iowa’s non-conference schedule and think the Hawks should be loading up on powerhouse opponents.

First of all...very few teams do that. Second, it is not as easy to schedule the top teams as you may think. And finally......since the Hawks usually finish in the 7-8 win range, why make it harder? Especially when they have lost to the likes of Western and Central Michigan, North Dakota State, and often struggle against Iowa State?

There was a time when Iowa's non-conference schedule included teams like UCLA, Nebraska (pre-Big Ten membership), Penn State (pre-Big Ten membership), and Oklahoma. Fry's first Big Ten title team in 1981 beat #7 Nebraska and #6 UCLA sandwiched around a loss @ Iowa State in its non-con games. That's a tad different than playing UNI, N. Ill., and ISU. Yet Iowa did just fine, beating two top ten teams, winning the Big Ten, and going to the Rose Bowl in only Fry's third season in Iowa City after 20 years of losing.

And the fact that Iowa has lost to powers like Western and Central Michigan, ND State, N. Illinois, etc., is an interesting way to support the opinion that Iowa should play a weak non-con schedule.

Fry said Iowa's non-con schedule should be built like this: (1) One easy win; (2) One toss-up; (3) One challenge. That still makes sense. But now Iowa has what should be an easy win (UNI), a toss-up (ISU), but no challenge...unless you think N. Ill. qualifies.

Big boys should play mostly big boy games. Iowa has done it in the past and prospered. I don't believe that playing a MAC team, ISU, and another Power 5 team is too much to expect, no matter what Alabama and Georgia et al. are doing.
 
There was a time when Iowa's non-conference schedule included teams like UCLA, Nebraska (pre-Big Ten membership), Penn State (pre-Big Ten membership), and Oklahoma. Fry's first Big Ten title team in 1981 beat #7 Nebraska and #6 UCLA sandwiched around a loss @ Iowa State in its non-con games. That's a tad different than playing UNI, N. Ill., and ISU. Yet Iowa did just fine, beating two top ten teams, winning the Big Ten, and going to the Rose Bowl in only Fry's third season in Iowa City after 20 years of losing.

And the fact that Iowa has lost to powers like Western and Central Michigan, ND State, N. Illinois, etc., is an interesting way to support the opinion that Iowa should play a weak non-con schedule.

Fry said Iowa's non-con schedule should be built like this: (1) One easy win; (2) One toss-up; (3) One challenge. That still makes sense. But now Iowa has what should be an easy win (UNI), a toss-up (ISU), but no challenge...unless you think N. Ill. qualifies.

Big boys should play mostly big boy games. Iowa has done it in the past and prospered. I don't believe that playing a MAC team, ISU, and another Power 5 team is too much to expect, no matter what Alabama and Georgia et al. are doing.

Almost everyone scheduled a lot tougher teams in the 70s and 80s like Fry did. As much as I love Hayden he started to change with the times too when you started to see a shift of softening schedules in early 90s up until 2000s when 12th game started happening in college football. 3 of the 6 final years under Fry were ISU and 2 easy teams plus the addition of UNI on schedule for first time in ages. Plus Hayden wasn't immune to bad losses either like the game at Tulsa.

I get it it would be fun to see one more exciting non conference team on but with landscape of college football has changed now with 12 games over 11, 7 home games vs 6 and now 9 over 8 conference games leads to what we have now plus the ISU conundrum. Long story short $ is why teams schedule how they do now. As I said in other post still think its BS how lot of the analyst and media types of college football just always ignore the 8 conference games ACC and SEC play.
 
Last edited:
Iahawkeyes17—You bring up Arkansas’ lack of a power 5 opponent. I guess if you knew your history and actually studied facts you would know Michigan backed out of a home and Home versus Arkansas starting this year. Remember the anger out of Hawkeye fans when mizzou backed out of a contracted series?
 
Out of conference games for Alabama since Saban arrived- Penn State, Clemson, Va Tech, USC, Florida State, Michigan, with upcoming games against Louisville, Texas, and Notre Dame. Can Iowa say they’ve played anyone close to that out of conference? Name the last perennial top 25 opponent Iowa has played out of conference...Nebraska in the 90’s. Zona State, Zona, Pitt, Cuse are not perennial top 25 programs.
 
Iahawkeyes17—You bring up Arkansas’ lack of a power 5 opponent. I guess if you knew your history and actually studied facts you would know Michigan backed out of a home and Home versus Arkansas starting this year. Remember the anger out of Hawkeye fans when mizzou backed out of a contracted series?

Yep and Iowa replaced them with a Big East school. How does that explain the other 3 cream puff teams they and majority of SEC school plays? Everyone whines about 2 Iowa has on the schedule and my point being ACC and SEC teams majority play 3 crappy teams every year and get a pass.
 
I don’t think Arkansas had options to replace Michigan w a power 5 team as scheduled are
set so far in advance. The immediate year after mizzou cancelled on Iowa (2005) the Hawks didn’t play another power 5 School besides the Clones. They played ball state and UNI.

I see your wanting for other conferences to play 9 game conference schedules. And I fully understand your point of fairness in scheduling. Although I’ll never understand why it’s okay to play an FCS school in September and not in November, same level no matter when on the calendar. But that’s an unpopular opinion.

I also know the SEC obsession some have on this board gets extreme. Don’t like it? Do something about it. Beat them consistently. The big 10 hasn’t fared well overall in the national playoff “final 4” so that would be the first step.
 
Almost everyone scheduled a lot tougher teams in the 70s and 80s like Fry did. As much as I love Hayden he started to change with the times too when you started to see a shift of softening schedules in early 90s up until 2000s when 12th game started happening in college football. 3 of the 6 final years under Fry were ISU and 2 easy teams plus the addition of UNI on schedule for first time in ages. Plus Hayden wasn't immune to bad losses either like the game at Tulsa.

I get it it would be fun to see one more exciting non conference team on but with landscape of college football has changed now with 12 games over 11, 7 home games vs 6 and now 9 over 8 conference games leads to what we have now plus the ISU conundrum. Long story short $ is why teams schedule how they do now. As I said in other post still think its BS how lot of the analyst and media types of college football just always ignore the 8 conference games ACC and SEC play.
..


Fry started asking for a softer shedule the day he arrived at iowa.
 
There was a time when Iowa's non-conference schedule included teams like UCLA, Nebraska (pre-Big Ten membership), Penn State (pre-Big Ten membership), and Oklahoma. Fry's first Big Ten title team in 1981 beat #7 Nebraska and #6 UCLA sandwiched around a loss @ Iowa State in its non-con games. That's a tad different than playing UNI, N. Ill., and ISU. Yet Iowa did just fine, beating two top ten teams, winning the Big Ten, and going to the Rose Bowl in only Fry's third season in Iowa City after 20 years of losing.

And the fact that Iowa has lost to powers like Western and Central Michigan, ND State, N. Illinois, etc., is an interesting way to support the opinion that Iowa should play a weak non-con schedule.

Fry said Iowa's non-con schedule should be built like this: (1) One easy win; (2) One toss-up; (3) One challenge. That still makes sense. But now Iowa has what should be an easy win (UNI), a toss-up (ISU), but no challenge...unless you think N. Ill. qualifies.

Big boys should play mostly big boy games. Iowa has done it in the past and prospered. I don't believe that playing a MAC team, ISU, and another Power 5 team is too much to expect, no matter what Alabama and Georgia et al. are doing.
Times have changed with the scholarship numbers being reduced! The ND State, UNI comment holds no water ...these teams are now made up of players that 30 years ago were all division 1 players. The playing field has been leveled more than ever. the teams listed above beat D 1 teams ever year ......this happened very rarely back in the 80's. I think most coaches would rather use a couple of games early to bring there teams up to full speed ....use a few players that may not see the field otherwise ...gain some experience. I love how people complain about an 8-4 season ....oh my what would they say if there scheduled all top shelf teams in the preseason and loss a couple and finished 6-6 would the same people be complaining ....I know the answer!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: iahawkeyes17
Out of conference games for Alabama since Saban arrived- Penn State, Clemson, Va Tech, USC, Florida State, Michigan, with upcoming games against Louisville, Texas, and Notre Dame. Can Iowa say they’ve played anyone close to that out of conference? Name the last perennial top 25 opponent Iowa has played out of conference...Nebraska in the 90’s. Zona State, Zona, Pitt, Cuse are not perennial top 25 programs.
Get rid of the crappy ISU series and have the Big Ten go back to 8 conf games. This would open great opportunities for home-and-home with Florida, OU, Notre Dame, etc. but until we cancel the crappy ISU series, nothing will change nor should it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoelBittner
We are a nightmare for the top programs of they we're to schedule us in their ninconferenxe schedule.

Good enough to beat them. Game plan to slow the game and limit possessions and plays. Good offensive line play with solid runners. Quartbacks that play well.

They have nothing to gain by playing us. We are not a Marquee name and yet we can beat them. And they know it
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT