ADVERTISEMENT

Education Department Plans to Fire Up to Half Its Staff

Morrison71

HB Legend
Nov 10, 2006
16,870
16,936
113
Trump administration officials are planning to fire nearly half of the staff at the Education Department, according to two people familiar with the decision. The move could come as soon as Tuesday and would gut the agency that manages federal loans for college, tracks student achievement and enforces civil rights laws in schools.
The email from the department's security office, which was obtained by The New York Times, did not provide a reason for the closure. But the administration gave similarly cryptic notices about temporarily closing offices before severe cuts last month at the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The Education Department had about 4,200 employees at the end of last year, the smallest work force among the 15 cabinet-level executive departments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sullivan and Moral
This is the lady in charge of doing its. She’s been running a fashion influencer racket for her 800 followers from her office. Apparently that’s the type of thing you need to do to not get fired.

 
So why do you assume that just because a job exists, it is useful and necessary? Culling happens in the private sector every day and in every industry at every company. It NEVER happens in the federal government, so I'm sure it is waaaaaay over due.
I’d be cool with cutting all spending to the DOE. As long as it goes straight into classrooms. More teachers, para teachers, supplies, etc. every study shows that’s the most useful thing for education spending. Which means we don’t need more studies.
 
So why do you assume that just because a job exists, it is useful and necessary? Culling happens in the private sector every day and in every industry at every company. It NEVER happens in the federal government, so I'm sure it is waaaaaay over due.
Every private sector company experiences stagnated growth and regression at some point. There has never been a day since 1776 in which the USA did not grow in size. That doesn't mean there doesn't need to be some trimming. But the comparisons to private sector companies should be limited.
 
There’s probably some truth to it but ultimately none of us have no idea. All of these MAGA boyz raucously cheering on job losses of their fellow Americans are nothing more than fanboys cheering from the cheap seats that have replaced critical thinking with fanaticism.
The sad part is they could have made DOGE incredibly popular by conducting a complete and methodical review of every department of the executive branch and recommended various cuts. Instead they just went in with a chainsaw and lots of dynamite without regard for the consequences.
So why do you assume that just because a job exists, it is useful and necessary? Culling happens in the private sector every day and in every industry at every company. It NEVER happens in the federal government, so I'm sure it is waaaaaay over due.
Once again, government is not and should not be operated like a business.

And even in the private sector they don’t typically lay off half a company on a whim.
 
Once again, government is not and should not be operated like a business.
There are definitely units within government that should be run more like a business. However I agree that on the whole there are important functions of government that shouldn’t be looked at from a business efficiency standpoint.

An example: I spent a little over 2 years within the procurement operation of state government. We did everything we could to run like a business. During my time, the governor asked the heads of all agencies to find ways to revert money back to the general fund. The most successful agency in this endeavor was Child Services. They became a lean organization by instituting a hiring freeze and upping the number of kids each caseworker was responsible for tracking. The reverted nearly $60 million in one biennium. They also saw the number of children with an active DCS case who died go from non-existent to nearly 50 over a 4 year period. But son of gun they were efficient.
 
There are definitely units within government that should be run more like a business. However I agree that on the whole there are important functions of government that shouldn’t be looked at from a business efficiency standpoint.

An example: I spent a little over 2 years within the procurement operation of state government. We did everything we could to run like a business. During my time, the governor asked the heads of all agencies to find ways to revert money back to the general fund. The most successful agency in this endeavor was Child Services. They became a lean organization by instituting a hiring freeze and upping the number of kids each caseworker was responsible for tracking. The reverted nearly $60 million in one biennium. They also saw the number of children with an active DCS case who died go from non-existent to nearly 50 over a 4 year period. But son of gun they were efficient.

Phuck them kids (after they're born). 'Merica! Repubber style!
 
There are definitely units within government that should be run more like a business. However I agree that on the whole there are important functions of government that shouldn’t be looked at from a business efficiency standpoint.

An example: I spent a little over 2 years within the procurement operation of state government. We did everything we could to run like a business. During my time, the governor asked the heads of all agencies to find ways to revert money back to the general fund. The most successful agency in this endeavor was Child Services. They became a lean organization by instituting a hiring freeze and upping the number of kids each caseworker was responsible for tracking. The reverted nearly $60 million in one biennium. They also saw the number of children with an active DCS case who died go from non-existent to nearly 50 over a 4 year period. But son of gun they were efficient.
The problem when people want to run government like a business is that they forget businesses are meant to make money, and taking care of their consumers takes a back seat to that. In government, they’re ultimately meant to take care of people, which means that a certain amount of inefficiency is inevitable.

I’m all for reviewing and looking at ways to streamline things so that they don’t spend more spending money figuring how the best way to spend their money and just let people do their jobs.
 
So why do you assume that just because a job exists, it is useful and necessary? Culling happens in the private sector every day and in every industry at every company. It NEVER happens in the federal government, so I'm sure it is waaaaaay over due.
I completely agree that there is wasteful spending. I just don't believe a foreign billionaire and a bunch of 19-20 year olds with hacking skills are the people to do it. You HATE wasteful spending but vote for the guys who blow up the debt every time they are in office. There's no logic in that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlickShagwell
Every private sector company experiences stagnated growth and regression at some point. There has never been a day since 1776 in which the USA did not grow in size. That doesn't mean there doesn't need to be some trimming. But the comparisons to private sector companies should be limited.
You are assuming that the amount of work one person could do 30 years ago remains constant so as the population increases, the more employees the DOE needs. That is not true. With modern technology, one person can do what it took many people to do in the past. That's called modern productivity and happens everywhere and the fact that the DOE is a public entity versus a private company is irrelevant.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT