All in due time sir.Who said you had to take down defenses?
If there’s “fraud” and “waste” in a $40B USAid budget, wouldn’t there be a lot of “fraud” and “waste” in a $841B budget?
All in due time sir.Who said you had to take down defenses?
If there’s “fraud” and “waste” in a $40B USAid budget, wouldn’t there be a lot of “fraud” and “waste” in a $841B budget?
If there’s “fraud” and “waste” in a $40B USAid budget, wouldn’t there be a lot of “fraud” and “waste” in a $841B budget?
Eleven out of 12 White House claims on USAID are inaccurate, misleading or lack context
@goldmomYep.
Once they saw how the Condoms for Gaza narrative took off, it’s just been one thing after another.
Well the Donald has some issues himself....Joe couldn’t even control his own bladder.
I can’t wait to see the justifications for why Al that is needed.All in due time sir.
You don’t have to take down defenses to review the finances.While the largest spending, you dont tend to take down your defenses if you still have concerns in other places.
Noted.I can’t wait to see the justifications for why Al that is needed.
You don’t have to take down defenses to review the finances.
DoD is the only department that hasn’t passed an audit. Personally I think that would be the place to start.
That other one though... yeah... they ****ed up. 😆
I’ll wager good money they never get to the DoD.Noted.
All in due time.
There is such a fog of disinfo right now that it has to be intentional.
I assume that's what Trump knob gobblers call his ballsYou familiar with the phrase, "low hanging fruit"?...
I’ll wager good money they never get to the DoD.
Can I get a WOB ruling here?The idea that men get quite when confident doesn't resonate with that young lad.
I've been watching my team run buckshot through your linebackers, no I'm not going to stop by and discuss every 15 yard flag.
I assume that's what Trump knob gobblers call his balls
There’s no real precedent for the access/authority they’ve been given.While I don’t bet on politics I do agree with you, I will be surprised I’d the DoD gets scrutiny, I will also say I have real concerns with Elon musk and his “kids” going through any department that has national security ties. What was the vetting process to give these people potential access to top secret information.
I've been in manufacturing for over 30 years l'm familiar with every catchphrase/lingo that's been tossed around in that time - I know "low hanging fruit".No,.. but given your apparent predilection with knob slobbering it's understandable that you might go there..
I've been in manufacturing for over 30 years l'm familiar with every catchphrase/lingo that's been tossed around in that time - I know "low hanging fruit".
I also know you can spend a ton of money and effort chasing down a tiny fraction of the problem while you ignore the huge percentage problems....{cough} Pentagon {cough}
No sir, the "needs more context" portion of the 11 occupy the "shred of truth" category. The 1/12 was straight up fraud.Shocked it isn't 12 out of 12.
Rare that a shred of truth gets stated by these jokers.
Then maybe Elon should stop with the sensational headlines. Lots of buzz but with very little to show for it.I'd say very little money and effort has been expended to date, so give them some time,.. Defense spending will be a little more complicated than condoms for Gaza..
Yeah....... that's what's happened.Then maybe Elon should stop with the sensational headlines. Lots of buzz but with very little to show for it.
Then maybe Elon should stop with the sensational headlines. Lots of buzz but with very little to show for it.
Or they can present incomplete conclusions and do major damage in the process.No, they need to demonstrate quick results to sell the DOGE program,.. Disappearing into a dark room to study things for 6 months and then issuing a very dry report only for congressional review has been proven not to work,.. They also need the public to be very much in the loop, so that congress will be forced to act...
So far, their big accomplishment is to spearhead dismantling a popular and largely successful USAID program, with little impact otherwise.Yeah....... that's what's happened.
Or they can present incomplete conclusions and do major damage in the process.
Shocked it isn't 12 out of 12.
Rare that a shred of truth gets stated by these jokers.
They uncovered fraud in the government and people are going to end up in jail. But sure. "Little impact".So far, their big accomplishment is to spearhead dismantling a popular and largely successful USAID program, with little impact otherwise.
You're concerned about fraud & waste yet you've voted for Trump every election?If OUR tax dollars are used for anything besides what we are told it’s SUPPOSED to be used for then that is fraud.
It continues to astound me that Democrats apparently have no problem defending the fraud and thus the waste of our money.
A three-time Trumper (and do not even try to deny it) doesn’t have the moral or intellectualstanding to lecture anyone. You really don’t have the standing required to lecture anyone axe murderer.So it’s enormously entertaining to see Democrat mouthpieces objecting to finding waste in spending of our money.
Great job by Ciggy as a willing tool!
The people who work for USAID would disagree, not to mention the people they helped.DOGE by itself can't do any damage,.. All DOGE can do is look and comment.
What fraud?They uncovered fraud in the government and people are going to end up in jail. But sure. "Little impact".
Do you see the "11 out of 12" in the headline, the other one.The people who work for USAID would disagree, not to mention the people they helped.
What fraud?
Not liking how the money was spent does not equal fraud. What was the actual fraud committed?Do you see the "11 out of 12" in the headline, the other one.
"Not liking how the money was spent" is part of the 11 thst needed context.Not liking how the money was spent does not equal fraud. What was the actual fraud committed?
There’s a very big gap between that and fraud."Not liking how the money was spent" is part of the 11 thst needed context.
So…?Did you go to the website he shared? US spending is there in plain sight no need for a bunch of Elon hackers to find it.
USAspending.gov
www.usaspending.gov
I haven’t seen any angry denials or fact sheets from the 10,000 USAID employees who have been spending $40 billion plus of our money yet, either.No evidence has been presented to support this as yet.
Maybe they should wait until they’re done before presenting conclusions?
Head count (pun intended) of all the $1200 toilet seats will take time. 😏Pretty much guaranteed,.. but defense will require a higher level of scrutiny...