Maybe, and if so how about that be the first option…do you think a treaty with dk banning chinese presence could be negotiated?
Maybe, and if so how about that be the first option…do you think a treaty with dk banning chinese presence could be negotiated?
Quit being an overly dramatic p*ssy.We are headed straight to Russia 2.0. This was the goal all along. He is going to destroy everything America has built and we are going to be a stand alone hermit nation fighting for scraps when it’s all over.
Spare the sarcasm shit too. This pissing on allies is ****ing ridiculous.
trying to buy as first option is hardly a crime. dk’s claim is awfully weak imo and selling would not be a bad option for them. but if not yeah treatyMaybe, and if so how about that be the first option…
When one of our allies says they are on Denmark’s side-which is where we are at-if it isn’t f*cked up yet it is about to be….so a hypothetical response to a hypothetical scenario is discussed like it’s more likely than either a purchase or an agreement that precludes any presence in greenland of say china? trump ****s up a lot of things but i’m not seeing an issue with greenland yet.
Shoot, I’m on Denmark’s side.When one of our allies says they are on Denmark’s side-which is where we are at-if it isn’t f*cked up yet it is about to be….
I told you guys @Nole Lou sucks. You have to read between the lines with some of these jokers before they show their ass like this.
We can't buy greenland is the problem.who’s being raped here? from what i’ve read 56k innuits live on this massive landmass located in the n american arctic.
dk’s claim is from a mid 19th century explorer visit. if we can buy this property and secure n america why not?
Has a certain ring to it, right?Gulf of Motherland
Nah, I don't speak the language.You would have been perfect there.
BullshitWhat " product " does the District of Colombia produce? GDP =266K...