No you're not, because the student isn't me either.I'm not a teacher. Seek the answers to your own questions. Google is right at your fingertips
No you're not, because the student isn't me either.I'm not a teacher. Seek the answers to your own questions. Google is right at your fingertips
I'm going to bow out of a discussion with a certifiable moron after pointing out that the right is significantly absent on this thread. This guy is one of yours...do you all want to be judged based on HIM?
Edit - except for 86Hawkeye who appears to be firmly entrenched in the extermination camp.
I didn't imply a damn thing. Go back and read the post. I said some don't survive the trip...the little boy is in the water...he drowned. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out but I'll make sure I spell everything out for you in the future.
And you still haven't called out the poster preaching genocide.
Because that is what this is right, genocide? Are there posters on here willing to claim that it wouldn't be?
Wrong. Though I disagree with their forum, I at least understand their frustration that similarly awful terrorist attacks in their country get little to no recognition.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-not-a-mark-of-disrespect-claim-a6738741.html
You didn't get a grin out of your original post when you said "one less Muslim to kill"?
And I don't have to "call out" anyone to satisfy you.
Yes. To protect my country, the idea of freedom, and for a safer world overall. Those people have had enough time to get their "extremists" in line. It's obvious the extremist views arent far off from what the general Muslim thinks.
s
Come on man. You're buying that revisionist explanation? Give me a break. Why is it so hard to admit that amongst the Muslim population a small, but still worryingly significant, minority believe in jihad or believe that terrorism against the West is justified?
No, I didn't.
This isn't an either/or proposition and to seek the full truth is far from "revisionist" (you don't understand the meaning): Yeah, I actually do "buy" the reasoning. It would be like asking American fans to observe a moment of silence for terrorist killings in Saudi Arabia after having no such courtesy (and even apathy) to the victims of 9/11. AND YET I do believe there are a minority of MIDDLE EAST Muslims (a fraction of the world's Islamic population. And let's call this what it is: a Middle East problem) who hold dangerous beliefs.
People who spout off during a moment of silence aren't limited to Muslim countries, by the way.
http://time.com/4114893/paris-attacks-aaron-rodgers-islam/
And if this is a Middle East problem, why were almost all of the attackers in Paris citizens of Western countries? What about the Tsarnaevs, who'd lived in the U.S. since they were 8 and 12? Were they a Middle East Muslim problem?
This isn't an either/or proposition and to seek the full truth is far from "revisionist" (you don't understand the meaning): Yeah, I actually do "buy" the reasoning. It would be like asking American fans to observe a moment of silence for terrorist killings in Saudi Arabia after having no such courtesy (and even apathy) to the victims of 9/11. AND YET I do believe there are a minority of MIDDLE EAST Muslims (a fraction of the world's Islamic population. And let's call this what it is: a Middle East problem) who hold dangerous beliefs.
Oh so it is only a small minority of Muslims in the M.E. that are ok with the Hating/murdering gays and treating women like 2nd class citizens...got it.
The Paris attackers were of middle eastern descent. As for the Tsarnaevs, are Americans who murder abortion doctors and clinic workers in the name of God a problem because they are Christians, OR because they are lone, violent, and psychotic?
No, I meant "dangerous" as in posing a danger to us. Try to stay on topic here.
What does being "of middle eastern descent" have to do with it? They were still Westerners with Western citizenship. The Charlie Hebdo murderers were the same. So are you saying that we should admit Muslim refugees of non-Middle Eastern descent but not Muslim refugees of Middle Eastern descent? Or are you saying that white Muslims are okay, but brown Muslims are not? That's just the silliest thing I've seen in a while. Who are the 200 Americans and thousands of Westerners fighting for ISIS? Are they a Middle Eastern Muslim issue?
Well, the good news for you is that some of them don't survive the trip. One less terrorist you need to kill. I'm sure this puts a big grin on your face.
Damn. As a father of little ones this picture hurts my heart. After reading about it he lost his 5 year old brother and mother too. His little tennis shoes damn near brought me to tears here in my office. Sad that he had to lose his life while trying to find a better one outside of his native country.
Aren't you a Lefty Tar?Well, the good news for you is that some of them don't survive the trip. One less terrorist you need to kill. I'm sure this puts a big grin on your face.
Are you so daft as to think Caucasian, or Asian, or American Muslims are as equally susceptible to extremist ideology as Muslims from the Middle East? That might get the award for dumbest thing I've read today.
Aren't you a Lefty Tar?
Then why do care about kids dying?Bat left. Throw left. My right hand is mostly for balance.
Then why do care about kids dying?
I honestly don't see why any on the left care about the refugees (men, women or children), if they die they die right? Abortion is your onus.
I am suppose to appease you? Ha, good luck.You realize this a patently absurd distinction, right? I'm ok with you using it, I just want to make sure you are intellectually honest.
I honestly don't see why any on the left care about the refugees (men, women or children), if they die they die right? Abortion is your onus.
If you've learned nothing else today, I'm glad you've learned that.
If you've learned nothing else today, I'm glad you've learned that.