ADVERTISEMENT

Fani Willis, you are too good to be true.

Speaking of Fanni and words:


429498413_3429254263887629_7240977962967957463_n.jpg
 
You're probably going to be pretty disappointed when she isn't removed. The defense hasn't proven that Wade was overpaid, that Willis got kickbacks from hiring him, or that their relationship in any way affected the substance of the trial, which is Trump's felonious tampering of the election.

The defense hasn't even established the genuine or even legal nature of the phone tower evidence. We have no warrant to obtain this data, a chain of custody to authenticate it, or expert testimony supporting the validity of it.

We don't even have a proven contradiction of testimony. All we have is unsubstantiated evidence somehow obtained just days after her testimony without a warrant and without anymore precision than Wade allegedly being within a mile or so of her location.

There simply isn't enough concrete evidence to kick her off the case based off of what the defense has produced so far.
 
Last edited:
You're probably going to be pretty disappointed when she isn't removed. The defense hasn't proven that Wade was overpaid, that Willis got kickbacks from hiring him, or that their relationship in any way affected the substance of the trial, which is Trump's felonious tampering of the election. The defense hasn't even established the genuine or even legal evidence of the phone tower evidence. We have no warrant to obtain this data, a chain of custody to authenticate it, or expert testimony supporting the validity of it. We don't even have a proven contradiction of testimony.
Uhhhh... lolol
 
You're probably going to be pretty disappointed when she isn't removed. The defense hasn't proven that Wade was overpaid, that Willis got kickbacks from hiring him, or that their relationship in any way affected the substance of the trial, which is Trump's felonious tampering of the election.

The defense hasn't even established the genuine or even legal nature of the phone tower evidence. We have no warrant to obtain this data, a chain of custody to authenticate it, or expert testimony supporting the validity of it.

We don't even have a proven contradiction of testimony. All we have is unsubstantiated evidence somehow obtained just days after her testimony without a warrant and without anymore precision than Wade allegedly being within a mile or so of her location.

There simply isn't enough concrete evidence to kick her off the case based off of what the defense has produced so far.
Yeah, you’re right, he probably was at the Porsche Experience until 3 AM.

Let me see if I have this correct, the cell phone data isn’t true, the chain of custody is broken, we paid in cash every single time it mattered, oh, and I almost forgot, her former friend is lying too. Whatever bro.

I'll bet that the two of them get disqualified.
 
Last edited:
You're probably going to be pretty disappointed when she isn't removed. The defense hasn't proven that Wade was overpaid, that Willis got kickbacks from hiring him, or that their relationship in any way affected the substance of the trial, which is Trump's felonious tampering of the election.

The defense hasn't even established the genuine or even legal nature of the phone tower evidence. We have no warrant to obtain this data, a chain of custody to authenticate it, or expert testimony supporting the validity of it.

We don't even have a proven contradiction of testimony. All we have is unsubstantiated evidence somehow obtained just days after her testimony without a warrant and without anymore precision than Wade allegedly being within a mile or so of her location.

There simply isn't enough concrete evidence to kick her off the case based off of what the defense has produced so far.
You have the audacity to call Republicans part of a cult after you post nonsense like this?
 
Yeah, you’re right, he probably was at the Porsche Experience until 3 AM.

Let me see if I have this correct, the cell phone data isn’t true, the chain of custody is broken, we paid in cash every single time it mattered, oh, and I almost forgot, her former friend is lying too. Whatever bro.

I'll bet that the two of them get disqualified.
How the phone data was obtained is absolutely relevant. How did they obtain this information without a warrant? And there are multiple times when Wade was in the vicinity, but Willis was demonstrably somewhere else like her office. If Wade was only in this square mile or so because of her then why was he there multiple times when she was not?
 
How the phone data was obtained is absolutely relevant. How did they obtain this information without a warrant? And there are multiple times when Wade was in the vicinity, but Willis was demonstrably somewhere else like her office. If Wade was only in this square mile or so because of her then why was he there multiple times when she was not?
You’re providing the laughs for sure.
 
Huey. They are lying their asses off.

It’s better to say she f’d up but it doesn’t affect the merits of the cases.
The defense is throwing out whatever they think will stick. Claim after claim gets demolished and they simply throw out new claims. The cell phone claims are just more of the same. Don't let team Trump fool you. Their intent isn't to provide real proof of as a conflict of interest. It's to manufacture outrage through headlines.
 
You're probably going to be pretty disappointed when she isn't removed. The defense hasn't proven that Wade was overpaid, that Willis got kickbacks from hiring him, or that their relationship in any way affected the substance of the trial, which is Trump's felonious tampering of the election.

The defense hasn't even established the genuine or even legal nature of the phone tower evidence. We have no warrant to obtain this data, a chain of custody to authenticate it, or expert testimony supporting the validity of it.

We don't even have a proven contradiction of testimony. All we have is unsubstantiated evidence somehow obtained just days after her testimony without a warrant and without anymore precision than Wade allegedly being within a mile or so of her location.

There simply isn't enough concrete evidence to kick her off the case based off of what the defense has produced so far.
Brought to you by the good people of “There’s no proof that men have a physical advantage over women in sports!”
 
Are you kidding me?
No.

IMO, the only way it’s relevant to the merits is if you believe she pursued these cases in order to hire her boyfriend so she could benefit personally/financially.

It’s an argument, but I do not believe that. I do believe her shitty judgment and unethical behavior has been an unnecessary distraction and tainted any convictions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGHAWK
Are you kidding me?
So far the defense has completely failed to prove that Willis benefitted financially from this appointment. That their relationship affected the case. And now the defense in introducing evidence seemingly obtained illegally and has in no way been verified. You don't see how any of this isnt in bad faith?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ICHerky
No.

IMO, the only way it’s relevant to the merits is if you believe she pursued these cases in order to hire her boyfriend so she could benefit personally/financially.

It’s an argument, but I do not believe that. I do believe her shitty judgment and unethical behavior has been an unnecessary distraction and tainted any convictions.
Team Trump spent millions on oppo research for this exact reason. They want the distraction. It's the entire point.
 
Of course. It’s what defendants do.

And Willis obliged them with her idiocy.
She never received anything of value from him and didn't benefit financially. He has so far been an exceptional hire returning numerous high level felonies during the grand jury process. He has been paid fairly and took the job after others turned it down out of fear of MAGA death threats. And despite all of this, we're supposed to throw everything out because they dated for a while? No way. That makes zero sense. It would be like demanding that Kirk Ferentz be fired after he hired his son and his son delivered one of the best offenses in the country.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
You're probably going to be pretty disappointed when she isn't removed. The defense hasn't proven that Wade was overpaid, that Willis got kickbacks from hiring him, or that their relationship in any way affected the substance of the trial, which is Trump's felonious tampering of the election.

The defense hasn't even established the genuine or even legal nature of the phone tower evidence. We have no warrant to obtain this data, a chain of custody to authenticate it, or expert testimony supporting the validity of it.

We don't even have a proven contradiction of testimony. All we have is unsubstantiated evidence somehow obtained just days after her testimony without a warrant and without anymore precision than Wade allegedly being within a mile or so of her location.

There simply isn't enough concrete evidence to kick her off the case based off of what the defense has produced so far.

Just reading through some of the righty posts so far, it appears they have nothing. bau lol
 
She never received anything of value from him and didn't benefit financially.
You believe this? Come. On.
And despite all of this, we're supposed to throw everything out because they dated for a while?
No. You don’t throw everything out. You allow it to proceed and hope she hasn’t irreparably damaged the cases going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: St. Louis Hawk
It's not what I believe. It's what you can prove. And the defense is completely incapable of proving she benefitted financially.
Assume she stays on the case regardless. Do you believe she’s telling the truth about her relationship with Wade? And that she didn’t benefit financially?
 
Assume she stays on the case regardless. Do you believe she’s telling the truth about her relationship with Wade? And that she didn’t benefit financially?
Based on her testimony, the complete lack of evidence of an exchange, and witnesses who said they recall her paying in cash I have no reason to suspect that he gave her money.

Beyond that their relationship is completely immaterial to me and this case.
 
The defense is throwing out whatever they think will stick. Claim after claim gets demolished and they simply throw out new claims. The cell phone claims are just more of the same. Don't let team Trump fool you. Their intent isn't to provide real proof of as a conflict of interest. It's to manufacture outrage through headlines.

It's Trump's and the GQP's M.O. These morons are too stupid to realize that
 
Based on her testimony, the complete lack of evidence of an exchange, and witnesses who said they recall her paying in cash I have no reason to suspect that he gave her money.

Beyond that their relationship is completely immaterial to me and this case.
How about him paying for trips, vacations, paying all the bills? Did she benefit in that way?

Again, I don’t think you toss the cases. Not at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkeyeShawn
How about him paying for trips, vacations, paying all the bills? Did she benefit in that way?

Again, I don’t think you toss the cases. Not at all.
He didn't pay all the time. It looks likely they shared who paid.

 
No.

IMO, the only way it’s relevant to the merits is if you believe she pursued these cases in order to hire her boyfriend so she could benefit personally/financially.

It’s an argument, but I do not believe that. I do believe her shitty judgment and unethical behavior has been an unnecessary distraction and tainted any convictions.
Okay. But I believe she’s tainted the case and she and Wade should resign.
 
You believe this? Come. On.

No. You don’t throw everything out. You allow it to proceed and hope she hasn’t irreparably damaged the cases going forward.
She’s now the focus of the case and should remover herself in order to let the issue proceed on its own merits. Why risk it?
 
Okay. But I believe she’s tainted the case and she and Wade should resign.
Based on nothing but unsubstantiated and perhaps illegal evidence? Shouldn't the defense have to step down? It looks plausible that they introduced illegally obtained evidence. Isn't that worse than silly arguments about who paid for wine tastings?
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed
She’s now the focus of the case and should remover herself in order to let the issue proceed on its own merits. Why risk it?
Removing her would delay the case for years or may even end it altogether. The new prosecutor would have to endure endless death threats, character smears, and God knows what else from Trump supporters. It's probable nobody would even want this job. Whoever the new person is, they will get millions of oppo research done against them, have them and their families threatened, and have everything about their private lives made public. Would you take this job?
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed
Based on nothing but unsubstantiated and perhaps illegal evidence? Shouldn't the defense have to step down? It looks plausible that they introduced illegally obtained evidence. Isn't that worse than silly arguments about who paid for wine tastings?
Sure. Fani put that down when she said she preferred Grey Goose.
If this case has merit then why take the chance to continue providing an enormous distraction?
 
Sure. Fani put that down when she said she preferred Grey Goose.
If this case has merit then why take the chance to continue providing an enormous distraction?
Do you think it's ok for Trump supporters to be threatening both Willis and Wade?
 
Do you think it's ok for Trump supporters to be threatening both Willis and Wade?
No it’s not. I’m not a TrumpMAGA and I don’t support efforts on his behalf.
You seem to have forgotten that this was started by the woman lawyer who is not representing Trump but is representing someone who used to work for him.
Do you think that oppo research is new and limited to Republicans?
 
No it’s not. I’m not a TrumpMAGA and I don’t support efforts on his behalf.
You seem to have forgotten that this was started by the woman lawyer who is not representing Trump but is representing someone who used to work for him.
Do you think that oppo research is new and limited to Republicans?
This goes way beyond oppo. Willis offered the job to another person before Wade and he declined out of fear for his life. It's easy to imagine anyone with kids refusing the job if she is removed. Would you take this job with kids? Would you even take this job with a husband? I probably wouldn't. No way I would subject kids or spouses to death threats. Who beyond a single childless person like Willis would even want this job?
 
No it’s not. I’m not a TrumpMAGA and I don’t support efforts on his behalf.
You seem to have forgotten that this was started by the woman lawyer who is not representing Trump but is representing someone who used to work for him.
Do you think that oppo research is new and limited to Republicans?
This started because Donald Trump, who you voted for twice, attempted to steal an election. Everyone should be united in ending his candidacy. But nope, y’all keep getting distracted by his games.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT