ADVERTISEMENT

FBI Whistleblower Testifies Bureau ‘May Have’ Had Confidential Human Sources in the Capitol on Jan 6

Pete Malloy

HR All-American
Oct 14, 2022
2,500
2,236
113
Trendy Waterbury Neighborhood - Des Moines
A whistleblower from the FBI’s Boston field office testified that agents in Washington refused to share hours of video footage from the January 6 Capitol riot between the offices because there “may be” undercover officers or confidential human sources in the videos whose identities would need to be protected.
The revelation came in a prerecorded video testimony from whistleblower George Hill, which was played during a hearing of the House Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government on Thursday.

Representative Matt Gaetz (R., Fla.) noted that a second whistleblower who was testifying in-person at the hearing, Marcus Allen, was allegedly retaliated against for sending an email linking to a website that said “federal law enforcement had some degree of infiltration among the crowds gathered at the Capitol.” Allen commented in the email that the information raised “serious concerns” about the U.S. government’s participation in the riot.

When asked whether the FBI had confidential human sources at the Capitol, Wray testified in November: “I have to be very careful about what I can say — about when we do and do not and where we have and have not used confidential human sources.”

“But to the extent that there’s a suggestion, for example, that the FBI’s confidential human sources or FBI employees in someway instigated or orchestrated January 6th, that’s categorically false,” Wray added at the time.

The hearing came after the subcommittee and the House Judiciary Committee released an interim report on Thursday that includes testimony about “abuses and misconduct in the FBI.”

The revelation came in a prerecorded video testimony from whistleblower George Hill, which was played during a hearing of the House Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government on Thursday.


Representative Matt Gaetz (R., Fla.) noted that a second whistleblower who was testifying in-person at the hearing, Marcus Allen, was allegedly retaliated against for sending an email linking to a website that said “federal law enforcement had some degree of infiltration among the crowds gathered at the Capitol.” Allen commented in the email that the information raised “serious concerns” about the U.S. government’s participation in the riot.

FBI whistleblower Steve Friend testified Thursday that the bureau closed ranks and attacked him after he voiced concerns about the politicization of the bureau.

He said the FBI is “incentivized to work against the American people and is in dire need of drastic reform.”

Friend had his security clearance revoked and was suspended without pay after he voiced concerns about the bureau’s handling of Domestic Violent Extremism and cases related to the Capitol riot.


This leaves one to wonder did the left leaning FBI orchestrate the whole Jan 6th matter?
 
5d0f5dad5271041a9710af2049e97056.gif
 
  • Wow
Reactions: DolphLundgren
Almost half the proud boys there were fbi informants lol just like in the Whitmer kidnapping "plot". At a certain point it seems like the feds are entrapping mentally unwell people for the sake of political talking points.
 
They need to release that transgender that shot up the catholic schools manifesto.
Very weird situation there.. what could possibly be in there that they don't want the public to see? I mentioned it in the 2nd ammendment thread, but I think people on hormone therapy should automatically get red flagged on gun sales until they are off of the hormones. There is not enough evidence about the effects on the human brain, especially one that is already suffering from mental issues with reverse body dismorphia.
 
Same FBI that Durham revealed put together the Russia collusion hoax based on known lies to attack trump. Yes, they were very loyal to the president.. lmfao
Durham's investigation was obviously slanted and didn't bring a single person on charges (except the one that immediately fell apart to a flimsy case). I think the FBI may have made a mistake in investigating it further, however the way Trump has acted and what he has stated has made me very much question why he is so positive towards Russia. I honestly think its because he is very similar to Putin in ideology.
 
Durham's investigation was obviously slanted and didn't bring a single person on charges (except the one that immediately fell apart to a flimsy case). I think the FBI may have made a mistake in investigating it further, however the way Trump has acted and what he has stated has made me very much question why he is so positive towards Russia. I honestly think its because he is very similar to Putin in ideology.
DC courts are DC courts lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: GolfHacker1
Almost half the proud boys there were fbi informants lol just like in the Whitmer kidnapping "plot". At a certain point it seems like the feds are entrapping mentally unwell people for the sake of political talking points.

Provide evidence the proud boys were fbi informants.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GolfHacker1
Durham and Barr traveled together, unethical but BAU for Barr, but only uncovered corruption by trump, and then stopped investigating. Nice.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GolfHacker1
Almost half the proud boys there were fbi informants
Why would this matter? That’s how the FBI investigates organizations they believe to be involved with criminality.

No one ever complains about terrorism, organized crime, or child porn convictions that are obtained that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bunsen82
Why would this matter? That’s how the FBI investigates organizations they believe to be involved with criminality.

No one ever complains about terrorism, organized crime, or child porn convictions that are obtained that way.
My entire point is that when you get to a level where federal involvement makes up half or more of the offenders that the offense wouldn't have even happened in the first place if the feds weren't stoking the coals. In the Gretchen Whitmer case the fbi was taking advantage of mentally unwell people who initially even presented challenge and push back to the ideas the feds were having fed to them.
 
My entire point is that when you get to a level where federal involvement makes up half or more of the offenders that the offense wouldn't have even happened in the first place if the feds weren't stoking the coals. In the Gretchen Whitmer case the fbi was taking advantage of mentally unwell people who initially even presented challenge and push back to the ideas the feds were having fed to them.

Provide info that the fbi took advantage of mentally unwell people. That is of course, those other than you.
 
Provide info that the fbi took advantage of mentally unwell people. That is of course, those other than you.

Two thirds were feds here! One of the people they set up was a homeless guy shocking up in the basement of a vac shack. Real good work, FBI..

As for j6, I provided the evidence you asked for. You're coping now and trying to downplay the massive federal involvement. Be honest, you dont even know how many proud boys have been arrested/charged, do you? It legitimately must be difficult going through life being such a Dunce, hawk. Please educate yourself.
 
Damn. I love a good nutbag thread every now and then even if I feel like taking a shower afterward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFSNOLE
Very weird situation there.. what could possibly be in there that they don't want the public to see?

Yeah, it is bizarre, do you think the brief filed by the children's families attorney is all part of the larger plan to keep the manifesto hidden? What did they write in the manifesto? Why did they ask the judge about June 8th, we all know what that date means, right?
Do you think the Nashville Police Chief who has been in possession of the MANIFESTO is a dark agent that was planted by the DOJ in case something ever happened in Metro Nashville? Those guys are always with the 4d chess.

Discerning the truth amidst all this confusion is a challenging task. Hypothetical situations tend to elicit biased responses, which can twist the narrative to align with personal fears and beliefs, but I am sure that is not the case with the manifesto.
 

Two thirds were feds here! One of the people they set up was a homeless guy shocking up in the basement of a vac shack. Real good work, FBI..

As for j6, I provided the evidence you asked for. You're coping now and trying to downplay the massive federal involvement. Be honest, you dont even know how many proud boys have been arrested/charged, do you? It legitimately must be difficult going through life being such a Dunce, hawk. Please educate yourself.

"appear to show" "one of the people" You made it sound like multiple mentally ill people. You failed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFSNOLE
"appear to show" "one of the people" You made it sound like multiple mentally ill people. You failed.
It's fascinating that every time I provide an example for you verifying my claims you move the goal posts. Pure cope. And telling that you're good with them taking advantage of even one mentally unwell person. You really are sub-human.
 
It's fascinating that every time I provide an example for you verifying my claims you move the goal posts. Pure cope. And telling that you're good with them taking advantage of even one mentally unwell person. You really are sub-human.

Another fail for you. I'd think you'd get tired of it by now.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT