ADVERTISEMENT

Fran BIG Coach of year?

I don’t understand the argument that if a team was “supposed to be good” the coach shouldn’t get credit. He built the team and coached them to contending or winning the title. That’s the definition of coach of the year qualifications, isn’t it? Having low expectations, but exceeding them gets little credit in my book. You’re the coach that fostered those low expectations, so you shouldn’t get a pass when you exceed them.
This is the exact reason why Ohio St football only has one B1G COTY since 1979. They’ve been the class of the conference, but the award usually goes to the biggest overachiever relative to expectations among the top teams in the conference.

There’s really just no strong way to say who did the best coaching job when some programs have inherent advantages over others to start with
 
I don’t understand the argument that if a team was “supposed to be good” the coach shouldn’t get credit. He built the team and coached them to contending or winning the title. That’s the definition of coach of the year qualifications, isn’t it? Having low expectations, but exceeding them gets little credit in my book. You’re the coach that fostered those low expectations, so you shouldn’t get a pass when you exceed them.
If your definition of the COTY is based on results then you wouldn't need a vote, just give it to the coach that winds up with the best record. To me the best coach isn't necessarily about the W/L record, granted it plays a part. But some of the best coaching I've seen are the ones that gets results even with less talented players. Some of the best and easiest coaching jobs are the ones that get the top recruits every year, yesterday Iowa beat a team that had 9 top 100 recruits on it's roster compared to just 1 on Iowa's. I'm not saying Izzo isn't a good coach but when you have that much talent to begin with it gives you an advantage over the competition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZumaHawk
Fran right now is 3rd on the list. Currently, it should go:
  1. ) Gard - Picked to finish 10th he currently has his team tied for 1st place and his remaining schedule is @Minnesota/@Rutgers/Purdue/Nebraska. Barring complete collapse 2-2 will be the worst they finish. It's possible that Howard may swing him into losing the COY depending on how it was perceived by the voters.
  2. ) Pikiell - Jumped way up the list when they went on an absolute tear through a murders row of ranked opponents. Currently, they have 10 losses with @Michigan(Tonight), Wisconsin, @Indiana, PSU on the way. They need to win all of them for him to win coach of the year over Gard unless Wisconsin collapses.
  3. ) Fran - Already talked about in this thread.
  4. ) Painter - Purdue is having a very good season but in my eyes, they have actually underachieved this year. They have 4 losses and at least 3 if not all 4 of them shouldn't have happened... the talent and experience are head and shoulders above every team in the B10.
 
Sorry, but if you’re including Painter, you include Underwood. Purdue was unanimously picked above Illinois, and they are currently tied for first in the loss column, while Illinois hasn’t had a full, healthy roster for more than a game or two all year.
 
Fran controls his own destiny. I don't think splitting the next 4 gets it done, but if he can go 3-1 or even 2-2 and make some noise in the BTT I think he gets some consideration. I am not a Fran fan (no secret there), but he is nearing the point of making me eat a few flocks of crows.

I still need to see Fran demonstrate he can compete in a 2nd round NCAA game. Seems odd to say given no Garza, but this team may be better suited to match up against a wider array of NCAA opponents who, like Iowa, don't have a true big.
 
I think that still depends on how the season ends. Personally, I would put him 4th at the moment. You did say consideration and I think his work does need to be considered.

1. Painter
2. Pikiell
3. Gard (barf)
4. Fran
---
13. Hoiberg
14. Howard (probably would have had him at 11 or 10 until the slap)
Agreed Fran should be considered but not win it. My vote would go to Pikiell for what Rutgers has done.
 
My picks as of 2/24:
1. Gard
2.Pickell
3.Underwood
4.Painter
5. Fran
6.Holtman

I include recruiting the portal in my criteria so that means Underwood gets points for Plummer,ECT.
Gard brought in a big from down south.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carlton
rutgers and wisconsin lost some good players. Iowa has had a favorable big ten schedule this year.
 
I think that still depends on how the season ends. Personally, I would put him 4th at the moment. You did say consideration and I think his work does need to be considered.

1. Painter
2. Pikiell
3. Gard (barf)
4. Fran
---
13. Hoiberg
14. Howard (probably would have had him at 11 or 10 until the slap)
Pikiell? He has 3 of his starters back and most of his squad including their best player, 10-7 in conference, 16-11 overall. Yes they have some good wins, lots of Q1, and he’s done a pretty good job but in no way is he coach of the year with as much as experience as he’s sporting.
 
Pikiell? He has 3 of his starters back and most of his squad including their best player, 10-7 in conference, 16-11 overall. Yes they have some good wins, lots of Q1, and he’s done a pretty good job but in no way is he coach of the year with as much as experience as he’s sporting.
They were picked to finish in the same spot as Iowa. They lost games to Lafayette and UMass early in the season. They don't have anyone close to a POTY candidate like everyone else in the top tier. If they end up in the top 4 of the league he absolutely deserves consideration. Like a previous poster stated, if it ended today it would probably be Gard and then Pikiell.
 
How the hell did you come to this? We play Illinois and Purdue twice, and our only games with the other top five teams in the big ten are on the road.
Good point, I forgot the only games Iowa had against Ohio State, Wisconsin, and Rutgers were all on the road.
 
obviously I think Gard is the most deserving so far. Underwood has not played with their full roster most of the year so he could be the winner and I wouldn’t complain. Pikell. Is competing against his own teams past mediocrity. He would be deserving as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carlton
They were picked to finish in the same spot as Iowa. They lost games to Lafayette and UMass early in the season. They don't have anyone close to a POTY candidate like everyone else in the top tier. If they end up in the top 4 of the league he absolutely deserves consideration. Like a previous poster stated, if it ended today it would probably be Gard and then Pikiell.
All good points, he does and should have his name in the running I suppose. COTY isn't exactly predicated solely on who ends up with the best team at the end of the year lol. I think I just wanted to argue when I made my initial comment ;)
 
As much as I want to throw up in my mouth before I say this, I would have to say at this moment in time:

1. Gard: He lost Potter, Reuvers, Trice, Ford, and Anderson. Its almost the same situation as Iowa, as they returned one 6th year guard and are playing a lot of sophomores and a couple of freshmen. They even had a graduate transfer big man like us too. But Wisconsin is in 1st place and they beat the Hawks. Had Iowa beaten them I think this could be a push. I would say that Wisconsin has more deficiencies than Iowa and they win more. I think they are a tougher team and play better defensively, and it really shows up at the end of games when they are protecting a lead. I think they play smarter than Iowa and are more aware of situation and clock.
2. Fran: Lost the national player of the year and 2 time big ten player of the year, another to the draft, another 2 to transfer and this team is 6th in the league. Losses to Illinois, PSU, Rutgers and Michigan at home are the reason here, and this team could easily be at the top of the conference if not for them. As I alluded to with Gard, Iowa seems to play much looser without regard to the opponent and situation, rather choosing to be efficient offensively and hit a number that they don't think the opponent can match.

----------------------------------------------

3. Pikiell: He did lose Mathis, Johnson and Young, who I thought was the heart and soul of the team. But he still kept Baker and Harper as a nucleus with a lot of experience. Mulcahy and McConnell have stepped up and Omoruyi has added a lot of athleticism. I have him below Gard and Fran because he was able to keep his leadership and nucleus from last year and basically play the same basketball with a few different players in roles. If Rutgers was at the top of the league, I would have him there.
4. Painter: I think Painter is a great coach, don't get me wrong, but I think he has done less with more this year than he ever has. Everyone knew what they had coming back with probably the best big men in the league, a bonafide lottery pick and shooting all around. This team should not have struggled at times like it has, and while 24-4 is a great record, they should really be undefeated because their depth and matchup problems are head and shoulders above everyone else.
5. Underwood: Same team as last year less Dosunmu. And that loss was not going to be as big of a deal because Curbelo emerged and was probably as good as Dosunmu. Kofi is a huge problem in the post and the shooters around the perimeter can make defenses pay. Underwood has done a good job, but not great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulldogs1974
I'm too lazy to look but he replaced 4 of our top 6 players. How many other teams in the B1G have done this?
Didn't Wisconsin lose 5 of 6 seniors (Davidson came back)? And they are ahead in the standings.
 
I don’t understand the argument that if a team was “supposed to be good” the coach shouldn’t get credit. He built the team and coached them to contending or winning the title. That’s the definition of coach of the year qualifications, isn’t it? Having low expectations, but exceeding them gets little credit in my book. You’re the coach that fostered those low expectations, so you shouldn’t get a pass when you exceed them.
As someone else above mentioned, that's why there's a vote. There are a lot of things to consider, and some things are more important to some voters than to other voters, and sometimes it depends on the season. If Wisky wins the Big Ten then it's a no-brainer. If Purdue or Illinois win, then the voters will decide if it was more impressive for Painter/Underwood to build a super strong team and keep them focused all season and lead wire-to-wire, or for a coach taking a team that was supposed to finish in the second division and instead had a very competitive season.
 
My picks as of 2/24:
1. Gard
2.Pickell
3.Underwood
4.Painter
5. Fran
6.Holtman

I include recruiting the portal in my criteria so that means Underwood gets points for Plummer,ECT.
Gard brought in a big from down south.

looks correct. If Fran goes 4-0 to close B1G and doesn't lose his 1st game in BTT, then maybe a case
for him.

I may be biased because I see Kris/JoeT as underuitilized and Iowa at 9-7 with a soft schedule is merely where it should be. Fran had the misfortune to lose 2 key guys, but unlike Underwood he wasn't able to replace an Aya with another scorer. CJ really screwed over Fran, but it takes two to tango, so who knows the full story of why CJ was willing to betray Fran like he did.
 
If your definition of the COTY is based on results then you wouldn't need a vote, just give it to the coach that winds up with the best record. To me the best coach isn't necessarily about the W/L record, granted it plays a part. But some of the best coaching I've seen are the ones that gets results even with less talented players. Some of the best and easiest coaching jobs are the ones that get the top recruits every year, yesterday Iowa beat a team that had 9 top 100 recruits on it's roster compared to just 1 on Iowa's. I'm not saying Izzo isn't a good coach but when you have that much talent to begin with it gives you an advantage over the competition.
As someone else above mentioned, that's why there's a vote. There are a lot of things to consider, and some things are more important to some voters than to other voters, and sometimes it depends on the season. If Wisky wins the Big Ten then it's a no-brainer. If Purdue or Illinois win, then the voters will decide if it was more impressive for Painter/Underwood to build a super strong team and keep them focused all season and lead wire-to-wire, or for a coach taking a team that was supposed to finish in the second division and instead had a very competitive season.
I agree, it’s subjective. My point was in response to those who think coaches that have more talent (again subjective) should be slighted because of that. More games to be played and it’ll be interesting. Does Fran deserve some recognition, sure, but personally not the COY.
 
looks correct. If Fran goes 4-0 to close B1G and doesn't lose his 1st game in BTT, then maybe a case
for him.

I may be biased because I see Kris/JoeT as underuitilized and Iowa at 9-7 with a soft schedule is merely where it should be. Fran had the misfortune to lose 2 key guys, but unlike Underwood he wasn't able to replace an Aya with another scorer. CJ really screwed over Fran, but it takes two to tango, so who knows the full story of why CJ was willing to betray Fran like he did.
I think CJ was a player and it would be great to have a healthy CJ, but to me the much bigger loss was Nunge. He could have provided the same role to Iowa that he has at Xavier and helped this team tremendously. To have an experienced big that can guard in the post, has 5 fouls to give and stretch the floor from the perimeter is exactly what this teams needs. Of course nobody will ever know, but without CJ and with a healthy Nunge, this team would be more like a 24-3 team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jonesy5960
I don’t understand the argument that if a team was “supposed to be good” the coach shouldn’t get credit. He built the team and coached them to contending or winning the title. That’s the definition of coach of the year qualifications, isn’t it? Having low expectations, but exceeding them gets little credit in my book. You’re the coach that fostered those low expectations, so you shouldn’t get a pass when you exceed them.
With the possible exception of a new coach following someone who left a mess.
 
If your definition of the COTY is based on results then you wouldn't need a vote, just give it to the coach that winds up with the best record. To me the best coach isn't necessarily about the W/L record, granted it plays a part. But some of the best coaching I've seen are the ones that gets results even with less talented players. Some of the best and easiest coaching jobs are the ones that get the top recruits every year, yesterday Iowa beat a team that had 9 top 100 recruits on it's roster compared to just 1 on Iowa's. I'm not saying Izzo isn't a good coach but when you have that much talent to begin with it gives you an advantage over the competition.
Winning at Iowa or neb is isn't the same as pu mi etc.
That's said, you don't get an advantage by creating low expectations pre season ..it's just silly.

As for MSU...Keegan is better than any of those top recruits. I thought we don't focus on rankings around here?
 
Fran right now is 3rd on the list. Currently, it should go:
  1. ) Gard - Picked to finish 10th he currently has his team tied for 1st place and his remaining schedule is @Minnesota/@Rutgers/Purdue/Nebraska. Barring complete collapse 2-2 will be the worst they finish. It's possible that Howard may swing him into losing the COY depending on how it was perceived by the voters.
  2. ) Pikiell - Jumped way up the list when they went on an absolute tear through a murders row of ranked opponents. Currently, they have 10 losses with @Michigan(Tonight), Wisconsin, @Indiana, PSU on the way. They need to win all of them for him to win coach of the year over Gard unless Wisconsin collapses.
  3. ) Fran - Already talked about in this thread.
  4. ) Painter - Purdue is having a very good season but in my eyes, they have actually underachieved this year. They have 4 losses and at least 3 if not all 4 of them shouldn't have happened... the talent and experience are head and shoulders above every team in the B10.
Gard is scum for coaching his players - like Davison - to be the dirtiest in CBB, then to have the chutzpah to defend them, reminiscent of the Orwellian ideologues who “defend” the 1/6/21 violent and deadly mob as “legitimate political speech”.

in other words: Some things are so obvious to all rational observers that they are indefensible.

Gard hasn’t learned that and never will.

I respect Painter tremendously though. And Fran runs a clean family based program.
 
This is the exact reason why Ohio St football only has one B1G COTY since 1979. They’ve been the class of the conference, but the award usually goes to the biggest overachiever relative to expectations among the top teams in the conference.

There’s really just no strong way to say who did the best coaching job when some programs have inherent advantages over others to start with
Do you think fitz would get Coty next year if they go 5-4 in conf play, since they were so crappy last year?
 
Winning at Iowa or neb is isn't the same as pu mi etc.
That's said, you don't get an advantage by creating low expectations pre season ..it's just silly.

As for MSU...Keegan is better than any of those top recruits. I thought we don't focus on rankings around here?

Fran did not create low expectations.

Go troll on someone else. Go back to complaining about Fran giving Ash a scholarship again, it's hysterical.
 
I don’t understand the argument that if a team was “supposed to be good” the coach shouldn’t get credit. He built the team and coached them to contending or winning the title. That’s the definition of coach of the year qualifications, isn’t it? Having low expectations, but exceeding them gets little credit in my book. You’re the coach that fostered those low expectations, so you shouldn’t get a pass when you exceed them.
The problem with that logic is the chaos created by the transfer portal. Look at Iowa. Fran PLANNED on having Nunge and CJF as starters on this years team, and Joe W could have returned as well. Thats not on Fran. He did make efforts to bring players in, unfortunately he couldn't land Robbins, (which I think was the kids mistake, because he would have been a great fit in our offense, and a rim protector). I think its fair to say losing about 70% of your offense is a lot of turnover to deal with and yet we're still just as potent on offense, even though the way we score is completely different then last year. I'd call that good coaching.....
 
I thought the post was that Fran should be getting consideration "now" and I would say I don't think anyone in the media is mentioning Fran at this time . If Iowa rolls off 4 straight with win at possible B1G champ Illinois, that is a different scenario and tough task to accomplish.
Then you'd be mistaken, because the BIG media is indeed discussing Fran as a candidate. Watch BIG today or the BIG show with Revsine and Katz. They definetly have Fran in the conversation along with Gard, Underwood, Pikell, and Painter.......
 
Last edited:
Fran did not create low expectations.

Go troll on someone else. Go back to complaining about Fran giving Ash a scholarship again, it's hysterical.
Troll? Are you dumb or blind? There are countless posts on here of folks saying they expected a sub 500 conf record.
Get a clue.

Hysterical that we piss away schollys in the transfer age? you're a clown dude
 
The problem with that logic is the chaos created by the transfer portal. Look at Iowa. Fran PLANNED on having Nunge and CJF as starters on this years team, and Joe W could have returned as well. Thats not on Fran. He did make efforts to bring players in, unfortunately he couldn't land Robbins, (which I think was the kids mistake, because he would have been a great fit in our offense, and a rim protector). I think its fair to say losing about 70% of your offense is a lot of turnover to deal with and yet we're still just as potent on offense, even though the way we score is completely different then last year. I'd call that good coaching.....
Filling spots is part of modern day college athletics. If you can't do it you're gonna get left behind imo.
 
Troll? Are you dumb or blind? There are countless posts on here of folks saying they expected a sub 500 conf record.
Get a clue.

Hysterical that we piss away schollys in the transfer age? you're a clown dude

lol....you are hilarious!
 
Fran has done a nice job patching things up here lately but a big reason we were picked so low is because he completely shit the bed in the transfer portal outside of Filip who is a decent player. And with 3 of the last 4 games on the road how bout we let the season play out, huh? I know OP is the guy who called us a lock first half of bten then said we were NIT bound after the very next loss so the constant emotional roller coaster is no surprise but it is kind of ridiculous.
 
Fran has done a nice job patching things up here lately but a big reason we were picked so low is because he completely shit the bed in the transfer portal outside of Filip who is a decent player. And with 3 of the last 4 games on the road how bout we let the season play out, huh? I know OP is the guy who called us a lock first half of bten then said we were NIT bound after the very next loss so the constant emotional roller coaster is no surprise but it is kind of ridiculous.
He also said OSU beat us before the game was even played and while trying to tell others how to be a fan lol
 
But you're the clown....

laugh-lol.gif
 
The 2018-2019 season we were picked to finish 10th in the conference in the preseason polls and I think we ended up finishing 6th that year and a 7 seed in the tournament... Then in '19-'20 we were picked to finish 8th but finished 5th in the conference.... You guys are mistaking the unsuccessful tournament appearances with this overall coaching ability, Fran actually does a lot of his best work when expectations are low and I wouldn't be surprised if next season is similar to 2018-2019

I wrote this in a thread after the tournament last year and people laughed.... Fran is a really good coach that just needs to get over the hump of the 2nd round blowouts
 
The problem with that logic is the chaos created by the transfer portal. Look at Iowa. Fran PLANNED on having Nunge and CJF as starters on this years team, and Joe W could have returned as well. Thats not on Fran. He did make efforts to bring players in, unfortunately he couldn't land Robbins, (which I think was the kids mistake, because he would have been a great fit in our offense, and a rim protector). I think its fair to say losing about 70% of your offense is a lot of turnover to deal with and yet we're still just as potent on offense, even though the way we score is completely different then last year. I'd call that good coaching.....
Looks like Robbins has only played in 6 games this year with an apparent foot injury while averaging 6.5 points a game. Good thing Fran didn’t get him with that news and CJ left with his injury or Iowa would of been in trouble depending on them this season without their services. Things work out for a reason.

Regarding coach of the year, Underwood if they win the B1G regular season. Think Gard can win it if they win the regular but that incident in Madison might sour the media on him and his reaction of not his fault. He was a big reason why that happened - take the w abs get off the court, no need or reason to explain yourself after what Howard and Michigan were doing. If Howard wants to say he’ll remember that, just do a blow by hand shake and say then don’t press down 20 with 15 seconds left. If those two teams don’t win the B1G I’d give it to Painter if he does. Think Fran and Pikiel have too many losses to win it this year but Fran has done a good job creating this team and line up. Just wish he would play Kris more, which it appears he is now doing. Long season.
 
Gard is scum for coaching his players - like Davison - to be the dirtiest in CBB, then to have the chutzpah to defend them, reminiscent of the Orwellian ideologues who “defend” the 1/6/21 violent and deadly mob as “legitimate political speech”.

in other words: Some things are so obvious to all rational observers that they are indefensible.

Gard hasn’t learned that and never will.

I respect Painter tremendously though. And Fran runs a clean family based program.
Violent and deadly mob? Hilarious. One person was killed. She was an unarmed, woman "protester", shot by one of the security guards. (security guard was not charged with a crime)
And I would imagine that you are one of the idiots defending the rioting and burning of our cities a year ago by the hate America crowd, as well as the murder and mayhem taking place currently in most of our larger cities. Yes, your Democrat brethren and the cadaver leading them are doing a fine job.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT