As much as I want to throw up in my mouth before I say this, I would have to say at this moment in time:
1. Gard: He lost Potter, Reuvers, Trice, Ford, and Anderson. Its almost the same situation as Iowa, as they returned one 6th year guard and are playing a lot of sophomores and a couple of freshmen. They even had a graduate transfer big man like us too. But Wisconsin is in 1st place and they beat the Hawks. Had Iowa beaten them I think this could be a push. I would say that Wisconsin has more deficiencies than Iowa and they win more. I think they are a tougher team and play better defensively, and it really shows up at the end of games when they are protecting a lead. I think they play smarter than Iowa and are more aware of situation and clock.
2. Fran: Lost the national player of the year and 2 time big ten player of the year, another to the draft, another 2 to transfer and this team is 6th in the league. Losses to Illinois, PSU, Rutgers and Michigan at home are the reason here, and this team could easily be at the top of the conference if not for them. As I alluded to with Gard, Iowa seems to play much looser without regard to the opponent and situation, rather choosing to be efficient offensively and hit a number that they don't think the opponent can match.
----------------------------------------------
3. Pikiell: He did lose Mathis, Johnson and Young, who I thought was the heart and soul of the team. But he still kept Baker and Harper as a nucleus with a lot of experience. Mulcahy and McConnell have stepped up and Omoruyi has added a lot of athleticism. I have him below Gard and Fran because he was able to keep his leadership and nucleus from last year and basically play the same basketball with a few different players in roles. If Rutgers was at the top of the league, I would have him there.
4. Painter: I think Painter is a great coach, don't get me wrong, but I think he has done less with more this year than he ever has. Everyone knew what they had coming back with probably the best big men in the league, a bonafide lottery pick and shooting all around. This team should not have struggled at times like it has, and while 24-4 is a great record, they should really be undefeated because their depth and matchup problems are head and shoulders above everyone else.
5. Underwood: Same team as last year less Dosunmu. And that loss was not going to be as big of a deal because Curbelo emerged and was probably as good as Dosunmu. Kofi is a huge problem in the post and the shooters around the perimeter can make defenses pay. Underwood has done a good job, but not great.