ADVERTISEMENT

Garland to release Jack Smith's Report

😆


You tried bud.



Jack Smith is going to Jail and even worse, if you claim to care about justice, you know you had to watch him **** her in front of you and you were willing to take it because "orange man bad".
I didn’t try anything. I didn’t make any claim whatsoever.

I just called you on your bullshit.

And you have yet to provide any supporting evidence to back up your claim that everything was fantasy and another Trump witch hunt.

Your “paraphrasing” of Jack Smith does little to address the actual report and what was in it. The only purpose it serves is to promote the reverse “Orange Man bad” sentiment.

In short, you’re just a different side of the echo chamber.
 
Even if the verdict is overturned?
Yeah, I don't even know how that works. It's a state charge so the Supreme Court can stick it. I mean, he would need to prove that the evidence produced in the trial was false and that's not what he's doing. He just wants his lackies on SCOTUS to declare the trial never happened and that's it. Because it wasn't fair or something. Only idiots will accept that and those same idiots just pretend these charges don't exist anyway.
 
200w.gif
Can anyone really be that stupid?
 
I didn’t try anything. I didn’t make any claim whatsoever.

I just called you on your bullshit.

And you have yet to provide any supporting evidence to back up your claim that everything was fantasy and another Trump witch hunt.

Your “paraphrasing” of Jack Smith does little to address the actual report and what was in it. The only purpose it serves is to promote the reverse “Orange Man bad” sentiment.

In short, you’re just a different side of the echo chamber.
Your claim was I was wrong and that was in fact bullshit.



My evidence can be found in one of the other threads, as presented by chis via bluesky post, of him saying he thought he had a case thst could have won if the evidence would have been considered, then there not actually being a case, then gim being unemployed.


That seems fairly easy to Google on your end.
 
Your claim was I was wrong and that was in fact bullshit.



My evidence can be found in one of the other threads, as presented by chis via bluesky post, of him saying he thought he had a case thst could have won if the evidence would have been considered, then there not actually being a case, then gim being unemployed.


That seems fairly easy to Google on your end.
I read that as if we would have gotten to trial and people see the evidence he would be convicted. Nothing there says “well if you look at it this way….”. He did it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chishawk1425
Your claim was I was wrong and that was in fact bullshit.



My evidence can be found in one of the other threads, as presented by chis via bluesky post, of him saying he thought he had a case thst could have won if the evidence would have been considered, then there not actually being a case, then gim being unemployed.


That seems fairly easy to Google on your end.
This is what I was responding to:

Here is the TL DR of Jacks report: "we think, if the evidence would have been considered this way, and this would have been looked at from this perspective, we would have won"
It would appear you are intimately familiar with the 170+ page report given your eagerness in offering an “objective” recapitulation of it.

The fact the case is not going to trial now because of the outcome of the 2024 election is not in question; nor is it relevant when considering your…unique interpretation and analysis of the 170+ page report.

Hence my comment about you being full of shit.

We’re done here. 😊
 
One of the most important points made in this report was Trump's blatant defrauding of the American people by pushing his big lie that he in fact won the 2020 election. The report clearly documents on numerous occasions in Trump's own words his acknowledgement that he lost yet he continued to perpetuate his lie successfully convincing millions of Americans that the election was stolen. Sadly, even to this day most of Trump's supporters believe this garbage.
 
This is what I was responding to:


It would appear you are intimately familiar with the 170+ page report given your eagerness in offering an “objective” recapitulation of it.

The fact the case is not going to trial now because of the outcome of the 2024 election is not in question; nor is it relevant when considering your…unique interpretation and analysis of the 170+ page report.

Hence my comment about you being full of shit.

We’re done here. 😊
Like arguing with a cinder block, that guy…
 
  • Like
Reactions: RagnarLothbrok
One of the most important points made in this report was Trump's blatant defrauding of the American people by pushing his big lie that he in fact won the 2020 election. The report clearly documents on numerous occasions in Trump's own words his acknowledgement that he lost yet he continued to perpetuate his lie successfully convincing millions of Americans that the election was stolen. Sadly, even to this day most of Trump's supporters believe this garbage.
He’s taking advice from Puty….
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT