Grassley Opposes Bipartisan Tax Bill That “Makes Biden Look Good”
- Thread starter NoleATL
- Start date
Maybe he was 20-40 years ago. Now, not so much.
I've posted this here before. But last time I talked with Chuck was at a Rotary meeting 14 years ago. It was clear at that time he had dementia.
Term and age limits are needed.
Term and age limits are needed.
Yes actually,.. In reference to that comment, the IRS staffers in question were authorized to carry firearms.
Exercising 2A rights = "strike force" and "ready to shoot"? Noted.
No, not exercising their personal 2A rights,..These firearms were job issue.
LOL...does that mean if Biden is reelected Grassley will STILL oppose it? Just expand his thinking. We can't give the Dems a win or we might not hold the House in the next election! It's total horseshit.
So every job where firearms are issued = "strike force" and "ready to shoot"? Noted.
The ones hired as special agents in the criminal investigation division would be authorized...as they ALWAYS have been. It's been around for over 100 years. Guess what??? The Dept of Agriculture also buys weapons and ammo for its people!!!! They coming to gun down farmers!!!!
"I am going to vote against anything that is good for America because it will make Biden look good and reduce Trump's election chances which would then decrease the chances of me getting what I want in the future."
No misrepresentation... You're just looking for a nuance that ends up not being nuanced.
In this instance, you would have been better off going the "$34 Trillion" route
Grassley specifically mentioned that this special strike force would be armed with "AK-15s",an assault rifle. The legisltion did not identify or otherwise authorize a "strike force" - that was invented by Grassley, and certain field officers have been carrying small arms for a long time. His comments were patently dishonest, a complete fabrication designed to arouse irratonal fear in order to generate opposition. You apparently fell for it.
Now I know why we so rarely hear from him these days-whose turn was it to watch him anyway?
Yes. They are IRS-CI agents. They are armed because they are criminal investigators. They investigate crimes such as money laundering that often involve violent criminals. This has always been the case. You a such a fool
Honest like when he privately admits he has squat on Joe Biden, but then mumbles out words on Fox about how HuNTeR and JoE are in the pocket of BuRIsMA?
no it isn’t. let me state it in a way grassley would understand. you can put lipstick on a pig but it’s still a pig. his final half sentence is the lipstick on a pig.
also, you know why they put provisions like that in place? so they can use them as a campaign point later. “elect us or else” is basically what they are saying. america first my asse
LOL at your attempt to spin this. Yes, he thinks the "bad" is bigger than the good. The "bad" being Biden getting credit for the good.
You're such a shill.
I’m not being disingenuous.
I’m not approving of Grassley’s vote against this bill.
I’m only pointing out that, his full quote does not say he’s voting against the bill simply to keep Biden from winning in November. It says he’s voting against the bill because, if Biden wins, the 2017 tax cuts will be killed. Maybe he’s even wrong about that.
But the OP omitted Grassley’s STATED reason for voting against the bill, so as to make it seem that Grassley would oppose anything to not help Biden get re-elected. Maybe he would, but we don’t know that from this case.
How is it taking away power if they aren't allowed to run. Can anyone run for President?
Because now, voters can decide if someone is too old/senile.
With term limits/age limits, an elected official can’t even run at some point.
Well there are age restrictions on how old you have to be to run for office. Isn't it the same thing?
There are restrictions to run for all different government offices. I guess 16 year olds should be able to run for Congress then.
