Of course there was some violence, it was a riot. And I've been very outspoken that any and all violent actors should not receive clemency or pardons and face the full weight of the law. The problem is that hundreds of people simply walked through open doors, waved in by Capitol police in a lot of cases even, walked around the Capitol, took a few pictures then left (typival tourism stuff). People who did that have been imprisoned and that is not justice imo.Okay, so Federal agencies had assets on-site, but where's the credible evidence they incited violence? Also, I'm confused on yours and others stance...was their violence or just a casual stroll around the Capitol? If there was no violence, then why did Nancy need to take ownership of anything?
Why would only dems need to hold themselves accountable? Wouldn't we want that from all politicians regardless of political affiliation?
Why do you think ray epps was never charged for incitement despite being on video for days (plural) encouraging people to go into the Capitol and break the law? Why was he protected despite obviously trying to create chaos that day?