Eamon Brennan's first 2017 edition just posted... Hawks not mentioned. I'm not sure how the refs could have messed that one up so badly...
Am I doing it right?
Am I doing it right?
They are on one list. They are a 10 seed. Not sure what he is thinking.Iowa is not a bubble team now. They are not on any list, Lunardi or otherwise. If there was a category "Not close to being in now" or "Massive work left to do / miracle", they would appear on that list...
I would like to see the resumes of the other teams not in the top 4 of their conferences that look better than Iowa's. I am sure a case can be made for a bunch of teams with 18 wins who have played nobody all season, but the committee rarely rewards them with a bid unless they win their conference tournament.
Tall task for sure, but 17-18 wins + 1-2 in the BTT should do it. 4-3 or 3-4 in next 7 leaves the door open.
Tall task for sure, but 17-18 wins + 1-2 in the BTT should do it. 4-3 or 3-4 in next 7 leaves the door open.
Agreed.We don't have a good resume. We are 14-10 w/ our best wins being a fair ISU team, a good Purdue team and a fair Michigan team. We have won ONE game on the road. We are not even close to the NCAA bubble yet. We are barely in the NIT field at this point.
Off the top of my head.
Minnesota (RPI of 23 and 8th in the Big 10). 8 wins over Top 100 RPI, 12 over Top 150. 0 bad losses.
Oklahoma State (RPI 27 and 8th in the B12). 9 wins over Top 100 teams.
Notre Dame (29 RPI, 7th in ACC). 8 wins over Top 100 RPI teams)
Duke (18 RPI, 6th in ACC). 9 wins over Top 100 RPI)
Va Tech (40 RPI, 8th in ACC). 8 wins over Top 100 RPI)
Michigan State (47 RPI, 7 wins over Top 100 RPI)
Other
K-State (38 RPI, 3 wins over Top 100 RPI). K-State is in trouble because of very poor non-conference.
The reason that Iowa's resume are as follows:
It may not be fair, but to some extent Iowa's fate was sealed before conference play started. Iowa's inability to schedule to the RPI made it impossible to be an at-large selection without more wins over the good teams on the non-conference schedule.
- Winning only 1 game against a good team out of conference. The ISU win was good, but it came at home. The UNI win most years would be decent (Top 100 RPI win) but UNI being bad isn't helping Iowa. Rutgers has a higher RPI than UNI.
- Playing a ton of crappy teams. Kennesaw State, Savannah State, UT Rio Grande, Stetson and Delaware State are all horrific, among the worst teams in basketball. Having 5 of them on Iowa's schedule is killing the RPI.
- Winning only 2 games away from home. RPI values road wins more than home wins. Loss at Nebraska is a killer, as the RPI boost from a Top 100 RPI win would have been good. Another one was the neutral court loss to Memphis. An eminently-winnable game that represents a lost opportunity for the rest of the season.
This is the weakest bubble of all time, IU in at 75 RPI shows we are on the cusp of being on the radar.We don't have a good resume. We are 14-10 w/ our best wins being a fair ISU team, a good Purdue team and a fair Michigan team. We have won ONE game on the road. We are not even close to the NCAA bubble yet. We are barely in the NIT field at this point.
Iowa needs to win their next 2 on the road, win the rest of their home games, and either beat Maryland or Wisconsin on the road, then we can talk about Iowa being a bubble team.
This is the weakest bubble of all time, IU in at 75 RPI shows we are on the cusp of being on the radar.
I feel better after that, he is horrendous.Jerry Palm of CBS on KGYM-1600 in Cedar Rapids when asked what Iowa would need to do to make the tournament, he said, "Win the Big 10 tournament!" When asked is there nothing they can do in the regular season to get into the NCAA tournament, he said, "Realistically, no, their only chance is to win the Big 10 tournament."
Agree, beating Minnesota would be huge for this teams metrics. If they don't do that and or beat MSU this week I am in your camp.Personally, I don't feel there are many realistic scenarios where the Hawks make the tournament in the regular season (beating Rutgers on the road doesn't suddenly mean that we are going to be able to go into East Lansing, College Park, and Madison edit: heck the Barn is a tough venue, and win those games. Maybe we come away with one, or at best two, but it still won't be enough to get us into the tourney).
That said, I feel that this team has continued to improve over the course of the season, and could be playing its best basketball come BTT time. I don't believe that there are any unbeatable teams in this conference, so a run in the tourney isn't out of the picture by any means. That's our best shot, IMO.
If the Hawks actually manage to beat Minnesota at the Barn, I'll probably need to re-think my post. Minnesota has a legit tournament caliber team (who has admittedly struggled with consistency) with tournament caliber athleticism, and is always a really tough venue. I'd expect the building to be electric Wednesday as it's a pretty big game for both teams.Agree, beating Minnesota would be huge for this teams metrics. If they don't do that and or beat MSU this week I am in your camp.
Oh yeah ESPN..........you know what happens when you don't have Iowa on the Bubble Watch?Iowa is not a bubble team now. They are not on any list, Lunardi or otherwise. If there was a category "Not close to being in now" or "Massive work left to do / miracle", they would appear on that list...
This. We also have a terrible, terrible home loss to Omaha.We don't have a good resume. We are 14-10 w/ our best wins being a fair ISU team, a good Purdue team and a fair Michigan team. We have won ONE game on the road. We are not even close to the NCAA bubble yet. We are barely in the NIT field at this point.
Probably, we need to get a top 6 seed to greatly enhance that.If you think about it, our odds are probably better to win the BTT than winning 6 or 7 of 8 down the stretch.
I kind of agree - with as many guys as we play, we could really make some noise (if our shooters get hot) in a tournament where teams aren't getting as much rest as they are used to.If you think about it, our odds are probably better to win the BTT than winning 6 or 7 of 8 down the stretch.
If you think about it, our odds are probably better to win the BTT than winning 6 or 7 of 8 down the stretch.
This. We also have a terrible, terrible home loss to Omaha.
We don't have a good resume. We are 14-10 w/ our best wins being a fair ISU team, a good Purdue team and a fair Michigan team. We have won ONE game on the road. We are not even close to the NCAA bubble yet. We are barely in the NIT field at this point.
cue Jim Carrey in 3....2...1....
Syracuse? Thought they got in with a RPI in the 70's last year.Not to be Debbie Downer here because I really like this young team, but I don't see how we get in with 20 wins. RPI will likely still be in the 50s. When was the last time an at large team with only 20 wins and a 50+ RPI made the dance?
The only way they make it IMHO is 7-0, or 6-1 with wins over both the remaining rated teams, PLUS at least 1 BTT win.
Eamon Brennan's first 2017 edition just posted... Hawks not mentioned. I'm not sure how the refs could have messed that one up so badly...
Am I doing it right?
I'm pleased as shit we're not on anyone's bubble list, and hope we remain as such. I don't want this team to even sniff any reason to relax. Whether they make the dance or not, I want the message driven home to the underclassmen that every game, if not every possession, matters.