Syracuse? Thought they got in with a RPI in the 70's last year.
If I am reading the old RPI chart right, it looks like they were 72 before the tournament - so you are correct. I certainly didn't recall that one. Nice catch.
Syracuse? Thought they got in with a RPI in the 70's last year.
If I am reading the old RPI chart right, it looks like they were 72 before the tournament - so you are correct. I certainly didn't recall that one. Nice catch.
He is lemonish on the basketball/Franny Mac side and a sunshine pumper for anything regarding football and Ferentz.LOL. So you're saying there's a chance....
I would never call Suterman a lemon sucker. But he does like his grapefruit. Usually pretty spot on in his guesses, on the low side.
Yep, I think being in the 50's gives you a half-way realistic chance. 60's - not impossible but not likely you get in. 70's, like Syracuse, well... Sure wouldn't bank on it. But I've heard that they're trying to get away from looking at the RPI so much now? I'd hope that's the case, but still - Iowa's resume is weak. Only two Top-50 wins (and ISU barely is in the Top 50) and only one road win all year... Plus the Omaha loss. Iowa definitely needs to steal at least a couple of these road wins down the stretch to even sniff the bubble IMO, and also must run the table in remaining home games. Plus winning at least a couple in the BTT.
I don't think Jerry Palm knows what he's talking about when he says that nothing Iowa can do in the regular season makes any difference.. There are road games @MN, @MSU, @MD, @Wisky.. So winning all those won't help? Baloney. Not only would we suddenly have several good W's, but that'd get us to 12-13 conference wins. Not that it's going to happen, but just sayin'. The guy's more than half-baked.
A win tonight, and I think the bubble talk becomes a little more feasible, but there would still be a LOT of work left to do before I think the Hawks have a shot.