It is peer reviewed dissent.
The kind of peer reviewed dissent that I was told didn't exist.
As far as natural forces go... You don't believe the Earth has ever cooled, or warmed naturally?
Here is some liberal SCIENCE FICTION for you!!!
- Thread starter WhatWouldObamaDo
- Start date
It is peer reviewed dissent.
The kind of peer reviewed dissent that I was told didn't exist.
As far as natural forces go... You don't believe the Earth has ever cooled, or warmed naturally?
The penis continues to appear tired. Too much manual activity in its youth. Thank you for your concern.
Once we can tax Global Warming we can quit talking about it. Al Gore gets it.
Bigfoot is like politics. All you can find is scat.
Don't want to offend you IACub, but this can't be real. There's no reality show about Unicorns.
No, it is not. It doesn't address anything about 'natural' forcings. It is a survey.
Still not correct.
Antarctic SEA ice has increased by a small amount. Gravimetric data still indicates that overall land ice is being lost. There is debate as to how much.
I forgot to ask about your sexuality. You might want to meet my friend Natural. Just trying to help here.
I CANNOT see Natural forcing himself on anyone. He's not that kind of person from what I know.
Per the survey, Natural has not forced himself on me.
Appreciate it, but I am male and like girls. I do, however, care for my fellow man and the care and maintenance of their manhood. I suppose that makes me a lib. If I were a conservative, I would simply ignore any problems you have with your penis and worry about my own.
If you were a conservative your only concern would be what women are allowed to do and not allowed to do with their vaginas.
No no, I like girls as well. I was merely trying to help in case you were gay. It's true, I was trying to help a fellow human. That makes me a bad conservative, but I hope a nice person.
And the little guy's just been hanging around all day.
The 97% statistic is a lie.
It represents a survey of only 79 "scientist" out of population of over 3000. It was limited to that group that had published some kind of climate related paper recently, and thus, was very badly skewed. Moreover, what they "agree" on is far more limited than is generally reported or claimed by liberals. In essence, the data on which they all "agree" is a 0.8 degree warming over the past 150 years, and that it is likely caused by a combination of natural and man-made factors.
Last edited:
There are actually several papers which all come up w/ a number at or near 97% (and well above 90%). Generally, in ANY field of science, >90% agreement is considered a consensus.
If you think the paper is 'skewed' or the data are a 'lie' then perhaps you could cite the specific papers to which you are referring.
Otherwise, all you are point out are pundit talking points.
But please tell us exactly the scientific proposition on which they agree. Be specific. Also, tell us the population from which the 97% was drawn, and their qualifications. You are the one touting this, so its your burden to prove it.
I can only assume all you climate changers are sitting by candle light in cold, darkened homes without furnaces or air conditioners, filling the tires on your bicycles with hand pumps as you ready your basic means of transportation for tomorrows' commute to work or the nearest welfare office. I certainly hope you're not using a " made in China " device to post on the inter-webs as China builds new coal fired power plants on a weekly basis. That would seem somewhat hypocritical.
Of course you are. Not that I begrudge you your insults, but you are in dire need of a mirror as you can't see yourself well.
That's a fine straw man you made there. Very fine.
I did not 'tout it'. I responded to it. And I asked the original poster to defend their interpretations.
So you're just like Al Gore, giving lip service to your core beliefs while railing on those that disagree. Got it. You believe.........just not enough to do anything that would impact your lifestyle.
Joe is by far the most patient and gracious poster on this board. Just observing this shit show made me want to club a baby seal.
Please do not conflate media statements with scientific papers. That said, point to a peer-reviewed "prediction" in a scientific paper that couldn't be "proven" (whatever that means).
