ADVERTISEMENT

House Speaker McCarthy gives Tucker Carlson exclusive access to Jan. 6 riot footage

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,492
60,625
113
Just when I thought my opinion of McCarthy couldn't get any lower he outdoes himself!:

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has exclusively provided a massive trove of U.S. Capitol surveillance footage from the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection to Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who has downplayed the deadly violence that occurred that day and claimed it was a “false flag” operation.

McCarthy has declined to comment on the unprecedented move, but Carlson said Monday night on his program that his producers have been granted “unfettered” access to security video when hundreds of pro-Trump supporters stormed the Capitol to stop the certification of Joe Biden’s electoral college win. Five people died as a result of the attack, and 140 members of law enforcement were injured as the mob used flagpoles, bear spray, baseball bats and other weapons to bludgeon police.

“So there’s about 44,000 hours, and we have — you may have read today — been granted access to that. … We believe we have secured the right to see whatever we want to see. We’ve been there about a week. Our producers, some of our smartest producers, have been looking at this stuff and trying to figure out what it means and how it contradicts or not the story we’ve been told for more than two years. We think already in some ways that it does contradict that story.”






Carlson said his producers would spend the rest of the week assessing the video and air what they found next week.
The decision by McCarthy, who has not spoken publicly or responded to questions about the release, was first reported by Axios.
Carlson, the network’s most-watched prime-time host, has repeatedly cast doubt on official accounts of what happened on Jan. 6 unearthed last year by the House select committee investigating the Capitol riot. Instead, he has repeated baseless theories that the federal government instigated the attack and blasted the committee, at one point giving airtime to Donald Trump’s former strategist Stephen K. Bannon hours after he had been convicted of contempt. Carlson produced a three-part documentary, “Patriot Purge,” that expounded the false conjecture that FBI operatives were behind the assault and that the Jan. 6 rioters “don’t look like terrorists — they look like tourists.”



The decision by McCarthy to provide the video to Carlson raised serious questions about whether the release of the footage would force U.S. Capitol Police to change the location of security cameras and why the speaker would give the material to a Fox News host who has peddled conspiracy theories about the attack and not share it with other news organizations.
Representatives for Fox News did not respond to requests on Tuesday.
McCarthy, who made numerous concessions to the far-right flank in his GOP conference to win enough votes to become speaker, has said that Republicans would investigate the work of the bipartisan Jan. 6 committee. McCarthy also vowed that Republicans would launch their own inquiry into “why the Capitol complex was not secure” on the day.

Former president Donald Trump often has tried to blame then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for the breach of the Capitol, falsely suggesting that the absence of enough security to turn back the pro-Trump mob was her responsibility, not that of the commander in chief. He also has falsely claimed Pelosi rejected his order for 10,000 National Guard troops — something that never happened.


Last month, McCarthy told reporters that he supported the idea of more footage from the Jan. 6 attack being made public. “I think the public should see what has happened on that,” he said.
Questioned about the video footage, Tom Manger, chief of the U.S. Capitol Police, said on Tuesday, “when Congressional leadership or Oversight committees ask for things like this, we have no choice but to give it to them.”

McCarthy’s decision to provide Carlson with the video footage drew harsh criticism over the security risks of handing over the videos that could contain information about the Capitol’s complex security apparatus.
Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (Miss.), who was chairman of the Jan. 6 committee and is the top Democrat on the House Homeland Security panel, said Monday that there could be major security risks if the material were used irresponsibly.


“If Speaker McCarthy has indeed granted Tucker Carlson — a Fox host who routinely spreads misinformation and (Russian President Vladimir) Putin’s poisonous propaganda — and his producers access to this sensitive footage, he owes the American people an explanation of why he has done so and what steps he has taken to address the significant security concerns at stake,” Thompson said in a statement late Monday.

Rep. Jamie B. Raskin (D-Md.), who was a member of the Jan. 6 committee, told The Washington Post’s Early 202 newsletter that the videos could be used by Carlson to prop up his misleading allegations.
“Undoubtedly he’ll be searching for any kind of shot that could support this deranged theory of what happened on Jan. 6,” Raskin said. “If you want to make tens of thousands of hours publicly available, then it should be available for all media, not for just one propaganda mouthpiece.”


Tim Mulvey, a former senior staff member and spokesman for the Jan. 6 committee, said in a statement that when the panel obtained access to U.S. Capitol Police video footage, “it was treated with great sensitivity given concerns about the security of lawmakers, staff, and the Capitol complex. Access was limited to members and a small handful of investigators and senior staff, and the public use of any footage was coordinated in advance with Capitol Police. It’s hard to overstate the potential security risks if this material were used irresponsibly.”

People familiar with the video footage say that the committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection had access to a special dedicated terminal installed in the committee office that had password- protected access to the volume of footage. The committee asked for permission from U.S. Capitol police before they used any of the footage in public hearings, these people said, as they did not want to publicly disclose the location of security cameras in the building.
The committee cut and minimized use of the footage accordingly, these people added.






“We used the material that we thought was most important in demonstrating findings, and we were extremely cautious in what we chose to use,” said a former committee staffer who expressed concerns about the security risks posed by Carlson’s access to the entire trove of surveillance footage. The individual spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk freely about the internal work of the panel.
 

Letting Tucker Carlson cherry-pick Jan. 6 footage is a very, very bad idea​


There’s an app that allows you to take a photo of a large pile of Legos and it will show you different things you can construct. I admittedly haven’t tried it, but the concept is fascinating; the more you give it, the more you can construct. Theoretically, given a big enough pile of Legos, including pieces of hundreds of different sets, you could cobble together pretty much anything.


This is how it works with information, too. The explosion of data and facts and comments and rhetoric has allowed people to cobble together all sorts of things, from intricate explanations of the human condition to the QAnon conspiracy theory. After all, what is QAnon besides the selective interpretation of various pieces of real-world information? It’s mostly pieces of real things assembled into a deranged narrative. A big pile of facts with plenty of available guides for conspiratorial assembly.
What matters here is the instruction set. If the Lego app only showed you how to make functioning weapons (somehow), our assessment of it would probably be quite different. Who is picking out the pieces controls what is being made.



Which, in a nutshell, is why it’s an extremely bad idea to grant Fox News’s Tucker Carlson the power to construct whatever narrative he wants out of the footage captured at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Sign up for How To Read This Chart, a weekly data newsletter from Philip Bump
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) granted Carlson access to tens of thousands of hours of footage from the Capitol, as was first reported by Axios on Monday morning. By Monday evening, Carlson was already teasing his team’s examination of the footage on his Fox News show.
“Some of our smartest producers have been there looking at this stuff and trying to figure out what it means and how it contradicts, or not, the story that we’ve been told for more than two years,” Carlson told his viewers. “We think, already, that in some ways it does contradict that story.”

Well, of course. McCarthy dumped a big pile of Legos in front of the “Conspiracy Theory Constructor” app, and it’s already churning out things that can be built.


Carlson assured his audience that his team was reviewing the footage “as honestly as we can,” which is probably true — but not in the way Carlson means it. Carlson has an extensive record of making dishonest, unchecked claims on his program, with Fox attorneys even admitting he should not be considered an objective source of information. His false claims include a litany of debunked or unfounded assertions about the Jan. 6 riot.
Carlson promoted false and debunked claims about government agents stoking the riot, from the wife of an accused rioter (whom he later interviewed on his show without comment) to elevating evidence-free and obviously flimsy claims about a man named Ray Epps to a national audience. He produced a widely debunked three-part series aimed at reframing the Capitol riot in a way that attributed responsibility to government actors — and slotted the response to the riot in his exhaustingly simplistic us-vs.-them narrative. When the House select committee investigating the riot first aired a hearing in prime time, Carlson’s show was an ad-free hour of handing the microphone to riot sympathizers and conspiracy theorists.

It’s not just that Carlson cannot be relied upon to actually consider the video in an objective way, though he certainly can’t be. It’s also that there is no reason to think that he will present the video in context, to include information that moderates what’s being shown on the screen. He’d certainly accuse the Jan. 6 committee of a similar fault, with some justification. But we’ve seen recent examples of right-wing actors cherry-picking details from large pools of data to make a rhetorical point in a way that seems instructive.


Late last year, after Elon Musk assumed control of Twitter, he reached out to a number of writers with demonstrated sympathy for the idea that the discourse was being polluted by some sort of elitist groupthink. Musk offered them the opportunity to peruse internal documents from the pre-Musk Twitter. Lo and behold, those writers began to use snippets of information to make public allegations that Twitter had been part of the pollution of the discourse by elitist groupthink.
Detailed analyses of those claims showed precisely where they fell short, from internal inconsistencies to excluded context. But Elon Musk had a big pile of Legos and he opened up the ol’ “Woke Mind Virus Constructor” app.

The entire point is that — given enough pieces of information, a motivated builder and a credulous audience — you can make whatever argument you want. Take a cache of emails from a senior official with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and you can create a conspiracy theory that leads to a guy firing a rifle at a D.C. pizza joint. Take 44,000 hours of footage from the Capitol and who knows what you can cobble together.






To extend the Lego analogy, the most important factor is the app you’re choosing. Right-wing voices, including Carlson, criticized the House select committee for offering a motivated presentation of the riot, with some justification. Imagine, though, if then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had in 2021 given the Capitol riot footage to Rachel Maddow’s team to evaluate. How might McCarthy have viewed that? Carlson?
There is an additional irony here. The reason that the riot occurred in the first place was that Donald Trump cherry-picked information and rhetoric about the 2020 election to bolster an argument that it had been stolen from him — an obviously false assertion. In other words, the attack on the Capitol that threatened the lives of legislators like McCarthy was heavily dependent on bad-faith assessments of a big pool of numbers and anecdotes.

We should have no confidence that Tucker Carlson will do anything but use the video to which he’s been given access for anything other than promoting his own narrative. And while McCarthy may think this is a short-term public-relations win for his side, he should understand that Carlson’s narrative is nearly as destructive to the Republican establishment as to the Democratic one.
McCarthy picked a bad app.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Torg and lucas80
I find it interesting that there hasn't been much focus on this story. I assume that other networks are going to sue over this. Even given some level of discretion given to a Speaker, this is a massive amount of governmental property handed over to a single, preferred, organization.
 
Is giving it to Tucker the same as giving it to Fox?
Maybe Fox wants it for their Dominion lawsuit?
Just a thought
 
McCarthy should be supplying Fox News with surveillance video. This is unethical.
He'll just claim it's in the name of "transparency". Not sure there's any illegality to what he's doing...

He should have released the footage to all the news agencies if "transparency" was the goal...which it wasn't.

Tucker will have an hr long cherry picked video
 
Could be lots of details of where cameras are and where the rooms were for hiding Pence and others, which could be helpful for the next insurrection.
Security protocols could be exposed. They missed Pence by a few feet the first time. Some video could help tighten up some things to help the insurrectionists kill him the second time. As long as McCarthy gets to keep the Speaker's gavel I am sure he's okay with Pence being hung.
 
So...anything of note in these video's?
Prepare yourself for some shocking, shocking video that has previously been hidden from the public. It will be cobbled together, with an inaccurate timeline, and a muddled context in an effort to prove it wasn't Trump supporters in the vanguard. The cops weren't beaten, either. They just fell down a few times.
Then the dumbest of GIAOT will breathlessly post it here as part of a disinformation campaign. The only question s will it be Biggrey, Northern, IMCC, or Coffland14 who posts tHE tRuTH first.
 
Security protocols could be exposed. They missed Pence by a few feet the first time. Some video could help tighten up some things to help the insurrectionists kill him the second time. As long as McCarthy gets to keep the Speaker's gavel I am sure he's okay with Pence being hung.
Small price to pay in his mind
 
I see that Trump Jr. already got his slimy mitts on some of the footage. Someone shared a tweet of his showing police opening barricades for rioters.
 
Do it. Put it to the test.
I've seen quite a few people grumbling on other networks about this access, which implies they didn't get it. Do you honestly believe that they failed to ask once Tucker was given the footage? Good Lord, man, it wasn't even Fox that was given the footage. It's Tucker who got it.
 
I'm starting to get the feeling there are a few members of the Capital police that aren't going to like this cherry picked montage of footage very much....


Probably in relation to this...

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT