ADVERTISEMENT

How could a man vote for Hillary Clinton?

She's running on gender. Voting for Hillary is like a man removing his manhood.

What a shrill feminist she is. And she's unethical. No thanks.

As bad as the Republicans are, I've decided to vote for anyone but Hillary.

She's running on gender, just like Carly Fiorina, Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin before her? Hillary has more experience than all three of the afore mentioned put together and its just another attempt to discredit her once she's elected - just like the sorry ass right wing losers who claimed President Obama won with the guilty white vote.
 
She's running on gender, just like Carly Fiorina, Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin before her? Hillary has more experience than all three of the afore mentioned put together and its just another attempt to discredit her once she's elected - just like the sorry ass right wing losers who claimed President Obama won with the guilty white vote.

I never heard those candidates repeat how they were running to "break the glass ceiling for women."

I just remembered that Hillary also voted for the Iraq war and led the charge in the disastrous Libya intervention.

Not voting for her.
 
I would expand they OP and ask how anyone could vote for her? Because the Republicans suck is not a good enough reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
I used to think a vote for Hillary was a vote for the status quo. It was the lazy/uninspired vote because she wouldn't do anything radically different from Obama and she'd have Bill in her corner.

The more I hear her speak though the more I dislike her. I don't trust a damn word she says and cannot imagine a scenario where she does anything but drive Congress further and further apart. I literally cringe at the thought of spending 4 years with her. At least Trump would be entertaining
 
I never heard those candidates repeat how they were running to "break the glass ceiling for women."

I just remembered that Hillary also voted for the Iraq war and led the charge in the disastrous Libya intervention.

Not voting for her.
l

That's because neither of the three knows what the glass ceiling is -

Hillary didnt lead the charge into Libya. The Libyan revolution was an off-spring of the Arab Spring. The Libyan citizens rose up against Qaddafi with the backing of the Arab League and Nato forces, so to put all the blame on Hillary is very short sighted and it suggests you have an active case of priapism towards Hillary. Sure, Hillary voted to go to war in Iraq, but just like the American polulation and every member of the Republican party, they too were fed intelligence lies by the Bush administration planted to sway votes in favor of invading Iraq. The crap about voting to go into Iraq - who got it right and who didn't get it right is way oveThisscwicThisscwic'mpky due to the documented falsified "facts."Those who voted NO, like President Obama and Senator Sanders deserve medals for seeing through the BUSH administratiin bull$hit. No WMD's were ever found, and you can say all you want that some were found but what was found had nothing to do with the lies put forth to commence the war for profiteering.
 
She's running on gender. Voting for Hillary is like a man removing his manhood.

What a shrill feminist she is. And she's unethical. No thanks.

As bad as the Republicans are, I've decided to vote for anyone but Hillary.

Meh, that stuff doesn't bother me. Just like it wouldn't bother me if Cruz or Rubio brought up their heritage. I'd vote for her over any republican other than John Kasich. I trust all the other GOP candidates even less than Hillary.
 
Apparently the only demographic she won in NH was the 65+

The country doesn't want her. Most people don't trust her. And the best part is the democrats now have to embrace a socialist. This could lead to Walter Mondale type of results!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
l

That's because neither of the three knows what the glass ceiling is -

Hillary didnt lead the charge into Libya. The Libyan revolution was an off-spring of the Arab Spring. The Libyan citizens rose up against Qaddafi with the backing of the Arab League and Nato forces, so to put all the blame on Hillary is very short sighted and it suggests you have an active case of priapism towards Hillary. Sure, Hillary voted to go to war in Iraq, but just like the American polulation and every member of the Republican party, they too were fed intelligence lies by the Bush administration planted to sway votes in favor of invading Iraq. The crap about voting to go into Iraq - who got it right and who didn't get it right is way oveThisscwicThisscwic'mpky due to the documented falsified "facts."Those who voted NO, like President Obama and Senator Sanders deserve medals for seeing through the BUSH administratiin bull$hit. No WMD's were ever found, and you can say all you want that some were found but what was found had nothing to do with the lies put forth to commence the war for profiteering.

Hillary voted for the war in Iraq for political reasons. She didn't want to be criticized for voting against it because she knew she was going to run for President.

She has no ethics. She's always embroiled in a scandal.

Also, dynasty politics is bad for our country. Having the same people in the White House over and over is not democracy.

Down with Hillary!
 
  • Like
Reactions: shoot_the_three
I trust all the other GOP candidates even less than Hillary.
This is just puzzling as hell. Based upon your preference for Kasich, I would assume you lean left, and therefore would support Hillary from a policies standpoint. Fine. But entirely objectively speaking I cannot believe that every other GOP candidate has given you something to legitimately make you trust them less than Hillary. With all due respect, I cannot buy it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pepperman
Apparently the only demographic she won in NH was the 65+

The country doesn't want her. Most people don't trust her. And the best part is the democrats now have to embrace a socialist. This could lead to Walter Mondale type of results!
But the Republicans are going to screw it up by nominating Cruz or Trump. I like what I saw from a NY Time reporter last night. She said Christie committed a murder-suicide on Saturday night against Rubio and himself and it is going to cost the Republicans in November.

Rubio or Kasich are the two most electable Republicans and neither are going to make it to March.
 
I used to think a vote for Hillary was a vote for the status quo. It was the lazy/uninspired vote because she wouldn't do anything radically different from Obama and she'd have Bill in her corner.

The more I hear her speak though the more I dislike her. I don't trust a damn word she says and cannot imagine a scenario where she does anything but drive Congress further and further apart. I literally cringe at the thought of spending 4 years with her. At least Trump would be entertaining

Like Hitler was???
 
She's running on gender, just like Carly Fiorina, Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin before her? Hillary has more experience than all three of the afore mentioned put together and its just another attempt to discredit her once she's elected - just like the sorry ass right wing losers who claimed President Obama won with the guilty white vote.
Carly has repeatedly rejected the gender card. She says to vote for her because she is the most qualified - not because she is a woman.
 
Hillary is FAR from my ideal candidate, but if Cruz or Trump is her adversary, my hand will be forced to vote for her.
 
She's very lenient on cheating husbands. It's hard to imagine that somehow turning into the law of the land, but maybe it could happen!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raglefant
Hillary is FAR from my ideal candidate, but if Cruz or Trump is her adversary, my hand will be forced to vote for her.

Is this you, bro?

Settle-For-Hillary-Shirt.jpg
 
I'm not quite sure how anyone votes between Hillary and Sanders to be honest. Sanders as President would even surpass Obama on the budget deficit who has put us in more debt than all of the previous President's combined. Sanders as President honestly scares me as there is no way you can possibly pay for everything that he wants.

Paying $15 minimum wage? You will need even more state money to to increase the starting salaries of Firmen, Police officers, teachers, and other state employees as they currently don't start off making $30,000 a year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
Hillary's biggest political liability is her perceived lack
of honesty with the American people. Her Email/Server
scandal, her Clinton Foundation scandal, her incompetency
as Secretary of State and lackluster career as U.S. Senator.

Then she played the victim card when her husband Bill was
forcing himself on Jennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, and Monica
.plus others. She condones a cheating husband but says
she defends women in the workplace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
Quite easily, as she is by orders of magnitude the most qualified to be President of any of the current candidates and the candidate most able to stand against the wrong headed ideas that would be highly detrimental for our country proposed by the Republicans.
 
Hillary's biggest political liability is her perceived lack
of honesty with the American people. Her Email/Server
scandal, her Clinton Foundation scandal, her incompetency
as Secretary of State and lackluster career as U.S. Senator.

Then she played the victim card when her husband Bill was
forcing himself on Jennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, and Monica
.plus others. She condones a cheating husband but says
she defends women in the workplace.
You mean lack of honesty right? The woman is a pathological liar. This is not debatable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
I never heard those candidates repeat how they were running to "break the glass ceiling for women."

I just remembered that Hillary also voted for the Iraq war and led the charge in the disastrous Libya intervention.

Not voting for her.

The depressing part is that other than Trump, the Republicans running want even more war in the Middle East. Pick your poison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
Quite easily, as she is by orders of magnitude the most qualified to be President of any of the current candidates and the candidate most able to stand against the wrong headed ideas that would be highly detrimental for our country proposed by the Republicans.

I love these onion cut and pastes. Props to the writer.
 
The Abedin email material contains a January 26, 2013, email exchange with Clinton aide Monica Hanley regarding Clinton’s schedule in which Abedin says Clinton is “often confused:”

  • Abedin: Have you been going over her calls with her? So she knows singh is at 8? [India Prime Minister Manmohan Singh]
  • Hanley: She was in bed for a nap by the time I heard that she had an 8am call. Will go over with her
  • Abedin: Very imp to do that. She’s often confused.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
Apparently the only demographic she won in NH was the 65+

The country doesn't want her. Most people don't trust her. And the best part is the democrats now have to embrace a socialist. This could lead to Walter Mondale type of results!
True, if Reagan were running. But there is no Reagan to be found anywhere in this mess.

And you could substitute "sane person" for "Reagan" and the point would be basically the same.
 
This is just puzzling as hell. Based upon your preference for Kasich, I would assume you lean left, and therefore would support Hillary from a policies standpoint. Fine. But entirely objectively speaking I cannot believe that every other GOP candidate has given you something to legitimately make you trust them less than Hillary. With all due respect, I cannot buy it.
Trump? Don't trust him at all; never have and never will. Call it a gut instinct or whatnot, but I always feel he's being disingenuous.
Cruz and Rubio? Not as far as I could throw them, both are extremely hypocritical and pander to the extreme conservatives. Cruz's actions in Iowa speak volumes.
Christie? Bridgegate, among other reasons.
Carson? His 'biography' is rather sketchy (apart from his accolades as a world-renowned neurosurgeon).
Fiorina? 30,000 people lost their jobs under her watch, while tripling her own salary, and purchasing a yacht and private jets.
Bush? Terry Schiavo, but he's not too bad otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT