ADVERTISEMENT

How could a man vote for Hillary Clinton?

We don't have "Primaries" in Iowa. It's okay to admit you are a die hard, liberal, Hillarista and always have been.
I've long been a critic of the caucus system, hence I don't 'support' any candidate. The only time I've registered with a party was as a republican to vote for Fred Grandy for the GOP nominee for governor.

As for the other states, the only one I care to see win is Kasich. If it's anyone other than Kasich for the GOP nomination then I'll vote for either Hillary or Bernie. Doesn't mean I'm necessarily a supporter of them; I just think they'd be the lesser of 2 evils compared to any of the other GOP candidates.
 
When I said "That's your opinion." the challenge was for you to provide the necessary proof to support your claim linking deaths of American citizens directly to malfeasance committed by Hillary Clinton.

I just said on her watch.

The boss is ultimately responsible.

If you're not able to be responsible don't take the job.
 
She's running on gender. Voting for Hillary is like a man removing his manhood.

What a shrill feminist she is. And she's unethical. No thanks.

As bad as the Republicans are, I've decided to vote for anyone but Hillary.

On Amazon. Selling out fast.:)
41m8GgN-JJL._AA160_.jpg
 
So 44 is your IQ? J/K we already knew that.

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2012/05/california-has-12-of-us-population-33.html

There’s more to support the notion that this is the welfare state. California:

• Pays out one of the highest maximum monthly cash grants to the average family on welfare, $638.

• Continues aid for children even when the parents lose eligibility.

• Provides benefits even to some who find a job and helps with child care and transportation while attending school or training.
You give me one state and I give you several - then you comment on my IQ?? I'll read your link more later just to be fair, but you were unable to rebut my proof.
 
LOL the name has changed 3 times in my lifetime. It started out as global cooling, then became global warming and now you marxists changed it to the nondescript climate change which can mean anything, but actually means "Oh look, we're experiencing WEATHER". You dolts are pathetic. Every nation (and American city) vvvv you control goes in the toilet.

http://eaglerising.com/1912/democrats-run-americas-ten-poorest-cities/

Oh please, the evidence supporting climate change is overwhelming, just check out NASA then try to tell me they're partisan. You enjoy putting me down, you need to grow up.
 
Hillary is believably for women's rights. Which cannot be said for the others listed.

Being for women's rights is not a threat to men's rights.

I am also for women's rights.

I do not like Hillary and there's very little chance I will vote for her - but my disapproval of Hillary is for other reasons.

I am too, did I give the impression that I'm not for women's rights?
 
For 44

Here is my worry list, based on bond ratings and other data, of the top 20 cities to watch for financial troubles in the wake of the Detroit story:

1. Compton, Calif.
Compton has teetered on the brink of bankruptcy after it accrued a general-fund deficit of more than $40 million by borrowing from other funds, depleting what had been a $22 million reserve.

2. East Greenbush, N.Y.
A New York state audit concluded that years of fiscal mismanagement — including questionable employment contracts and illegal payments to town officials — left East Greenbush more than $2 million in debt.

3. Fresno, Calif.
Fresno had the ratings of its lease-revenue bonds downgraded to junk-level by Moody's, which also downgraded its convention center and pension obligation bonds due to the city's "exceedingly weak financial position."

4. Gulf County, Fla.
Fitch Ratings warned that Gulf County's predominately rural economy is "narrowly focused," with income levels one-quarter below national averages and economic indicators for the county also comparing unfavorably to national averages.

5. Harrisburg, Pa.
Harrisburg is at least $345 million in debt, thanks largely to municipal bonds it guaranteed in order to finance upgrades to its problematic waste-to-energy trash incinerator.

6. Irvington, N.J.
Irvington has a violent crime rate six times higher than New Jersey's average, with Moody's citing "wealth indicators below state and national averages and tax-base and population declines due to increased tax appeals and foreclosures."

7. Jefferson County, Ala.
Jefferson County, home to the city of Birmingham, has been dealing with the collapse of refinancing for a sewer bond. It filed for bankruptcy protection in 2011 over a $3.14 billion sewer bond debt.

8. Menasha, Wis.
Menasha defaulted on bonds in 2007 it had issued to fund a steam plant which has since closed and left the city permanently in the red and, as of 2011, had $16 million in general fund revenue, but had $43.4 million in outstanding debt.

9. Newburgh, N.Y.
Newburgh was cited by Moody's for "tax base erosion and a weak socioeconomic profile," with 26 percent of its population below the poverty line and its school district facing a $2 million budget gap.

10. Oakland, Calif.
Oakland is trying to get out of a Goldman Sachs-brokered interest rate swap that is costing it $4 million a year. According to a recent city audit, Oakland has lost $250 million from a 1997 pension obligation bond sale and subsequent investment strategy.

11. Philadelphia School District, Pa.
Philadelphia's school district, the nation's eighth-largest, faces a $304 million deficit in its $2.35 billion budget, and is seeking $133 million from labor-contract savings to prevent further cutbacks.

12. Pontiac, Mich.
Pontiac, where the emergency manager has restructured the city's finances, was downgraded by Moody's, reflecting the city's history of fiscal distress and narrow liquidity.

13. Providence, R.I.
Providence, rumored to be filing for bankruptcy for more than a year, experienced consecutive deficits through fiscal 2012, has a high-debt burden and significant unfunded pension liabilities, as well as high unemployment and low income levels.

14. Riverdale, Ill.
The credit rating for Riverdale is under review by Moody's because the city has not released an audit of interim or unaudited data for the year that ended April 30, 2012.

15. Salem, N.J.
Salem is under close fiscal supervision after it issued bonds to finance the construction of the Finlaw State Office Building, which was delayed by construction issues, and its leasing revenues are not enough to cover the debt payments and the maintenance fees.

16. Strafford County, N.H.
Strafford County regularly borrows money to cover its short-term cash needs after it spent two-fifths of its budget on a nursing home, which lost $36 million from 2004 to 2009.

17. Taylor, Mich.
Taylor has a large deficit and is vulnerable due to significant declines in the tax base, limited financial flexibility, and above-average unfunded pension obligations.

18. Vadnais Heights, Minn.
The St. Paul suburb of Vadnais Heights had its debt rating downgraded to junk last fall by Moody's after the city council voted to stop payments to a sports center financed by bonds.

19. Wenatchee, Wash.
Wenatchee defaulted on $42 million in debt associated with the Town Toyota Center, a multipurpose arena, and has ongoing financial issues due to the default.
Special:
20. Woonsocket, R.I.
Woonsocket faces near-term liquidity shortages necessitating an advance in state aid, a high-debt burden and unfunded pension liabilities, with Moody's citing the city's continuing difficulties in making spending cuts because of poor management and imprecise accounting.

Seriously?? I'll put up our entire iinfrastructure - it's crumbling apart and the Republicans are encouraging that. And it's all about taxes, Grover Norquist has the Republicans by their balls and it greatly effects our national security. Then there's Flint...
 
No. I never heard him shirk responsibility under oath in front of a congressional review.
Can you explain your logic here?

You seem to be saying that if he had shirked responsibility before Congress then he would be responsible, but if he didn't shirk responsibility he wouldn't be responsible.

I didn't realize responsibility was some sort of Schrodinger's-cat-like quantum phenomenon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
LOL the name has changed 3 times in my lifetime. It started out as global cooling, then became global warming and now you marxists changed it to the nondescript climate change which can mean anything, but actually means "Oh look, we're experiencing WEATHER".
Sadly, this is what has become of the once-proud conservative tradition in America. Conservatism has devolved into a bunch of lightweights bitching about the labels without ever bothering to learn the facts.
 
I am too, did I give the impression that I'm not for women's rights?
The first part of my comment was aimed at people who might not know (or prefer to ignore) the point I made. The second part was to show that you don't have to support Hillary just because you support women's rights.
 
The first part of my comment was aimed at people who might not know (or prefer to ignore) the point I made. The second part was to show that you don't have to support Hillary just because you support women's rights.

I'm well aware of that, I didn't intend to give an impression otherwise.
 
No. I never heard him shirk responsibility under oath in front of a congressional review.
Still haven't answered the original question.

"So, you would be comfortable saying almost 3,000 people were killed on Colin Powell's watch?"

This isn't about what Hillary has said or done. If you are going to say that there were American deaths from terrorist attacks under her watch, then you must acknowledge the same about any other Secretary of State.

FWIW: I really like Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice, so this isn't a partisan issue with me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Fairly new, yes. Perhaps I misread your comment, if so I offer my apology. I fully trust science, however I believe climate science is more precise than polling data.

It's all data collection, analysis, and interpretation (human science, political science, climate science).

Regardless Hillary is a bad candidate and from the looks of it an egotistical, lying, power hungry individual who will do or say anything to get elected. She is the exact type of person we don't need another of in DC.
 
A real man would never vote for Hil-liar-y, only a limp wrist-ed metro sexual type would.

On a side note who thinks that Hil-liar-y will divorce Bill if her presidential bid fails? I do. Her and Chelsea have obviously had him castrated from the looks of these pictures. No reason to keep Bill around if she no longer can use him.

BN-ES563_Bill_G_20140925183104.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: starbrown
And this thread is further proof that HROT is filled with welfare queens passing themselves off as real men.
 
It's all data collection, analysis, and interpretation (human science, political science, climate science).

Regardless Hillary is a bad candidate and from the looks of it an egotistical, lying, power hungry individual who will do or say anything to get elected. She is the exact type of person we don't need another of in DC.

Personally I like Bernie and I agree with you on Hillary. I do think the eight Benghazi investigations and the emails have been blown out of proportion and the right wing has taken those things too far - which is par for the course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT