While far from my first or 2nd choice, it's hard to believe Alford coached teams could produce worse results than Archie. He took Crean's guys in year one to a 6th seed in the BTT. That's his best showing thus far and it has been going the wrong direction ever since.
Defense is great to have, but can't be your only calling card. Archie teams offensively have been atrocious. The only things they have done consistently in four seasons is get off to slow starts, run a grinding/stagnant O, shoot FTs at a 60% clip and rank near the bottom of the league in 3-point shooting. Then, when they actually do need to lean on their good D for a big stop in crunch time for the win (see end of regulation at Wisconsin) they can't get it done either. Besides that everything is great (TIC). How is it a college pg can't teach offense?
Archie's lack of emotion and urgency has rubbed off on the team. Games vs your rival ARE bigger and should have some more emotional investment, yet IU just comes out to play like it's any other game. PU comes out dialed in to win.
Unfortunately IU probably has Archie one more year and it won't get better. Just hard to believe that the hole Crean had to dig out of was so much deeper and in year 4 he beat UK, ND, OSU and VCU getting to the Sweet 16 with Watford, VO, Hulls, Yogi and Zeller. Archie inherited way more than Crean and the product on the floor has deteriorated to nearly unwatchable.
Again, Alford far from the top of my list, but after what Archie has produced, I and probably everyone reading this, could come up with long lists of realistic names of guys who couldn't do much worse.