Tough poll.
It all comes down to Iowa's 3PT shooting IMO (assuming Garza stays out of foul trouble). If the Hawks are clicking on 3s (+40%), I believe they have a good shot at the F4. The better the %, the better the chance. 3PT shots not falling? Lower seed upset very possible afterRd1.
I voted Elite8. If Connor McCaffery is suddenly hot ---Final 4?..... we all know what the scouting report will be for CM (sag off him around the arc). Maybe that was all part of Fran's plan.... spring the real CM 3PT assassin in the Big Dance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
)
IMO, the extreme importance of 3 pt shooting is an illusion. The difference between 35% and 40%
on 20 shots is only 3 points, less any put backs on offensive rebounds.
The key to building a strong tournament team is consistency and balance built on strong levels of defense, and rebounding, combined with astute bench coaching. Good shooting is just a bonus.
Fran does not build good tournament teams. Vulnerability in any of those areas exposes us to failure against almost any tournament team. Garza is an insurance policy in our first game because he will overcome any level of play by us or our opponent. But that will be the last of our "safe games".
Which subsequent game will our improved defense relapse as it did yesterday? Why did Fran wait until the last 10 games of Garza's 4 year career (or Fran's 11 year tenure) to emphasize defense? The recent change makes it susceptible to relapse.
Which subsequent game will Fran put Garza on the bench for 12 minutes in the first half or make some other game-losing substitution decisions?
Which subsequent game will Fran make late game tactical decisions that give us no chance?
Which subsequent game will our combination of poor offensive rebounding and TOs result in too few shot attempts?
These vulnerabilities become additive in a tournament. I've listed 4 of them. Even If the chances of avoiding each of them are 85%, the chances of avoiding all of them in any one game is .85x.85x.85x.85
or 52%.
Obviously match-ups have a huge impact, but lacking that info at this point, and not even considering a higher level of opponent after the second game, I see our chances as:
winning 2 games: 50%
winning 3 games 25%
winning 4 games 10%
We need to get lucky!