ADVERTISEMENT

I am always impressed when a hotel provides the Wall Street Journal....

The Tradition

HR King
Apr 23, 2002
123,566
97,190
113
It makes the USA Today look like the Scholastic "Weekly Reader".

So much more content.

So much more quality.

For example, there was an excellent editorial yesterday arguing that the Democrats really would like to impeach Trump voters instead of Trump.

And a really funny article about the Minshew mustache catching on with men (much to the horror of of their wives and girlfriends).

Another great story on why NFL QBs keep breaking passing records.

Fantastic coverage of world events, business and the markets of course, just packed with great content.

Yesterday's newspaper was so packed with great stuff that I didn't even get to today's paper yet. I'll put that in my bag for some some great reading tonight.

The WSJ is what a real newspaper looks like.
 
If a person just read the WSJ or NYT every day they would be better (and more accurately) informed that 95% of the populace. If they read both each day they would be better informed than 99.99%.

Frankly, if someone just read any major newspaper every day - LA Times, Washing Post, etc - and ignored all other media they would be far better informed than the vast majority of people. Newspapers have time to vet their sources, pass through editors, etc and so they rarely get things wrong. And that same process, along with limited print space, make for a far superior selection of content. And while they have limited print space, they target an audience with a longer attention span, so the stories they do run have a high degree of detail compared to what you'll see on TV or the Internet.

WSJ is a great newspaper.
 
If a person just read the WSJ or NYT every day they would be better (and more accurately) informed that 95% of the populace. If they read both each day they would be better informed than 99.99%.

Frankly, if someone just read any major newspaper every day - LA Times, Washing Post, etc - and ignored all other media they would be far better informed than the vast majority of people. Newspapers have time to vet their sources, pass through editors, etc and so they rarely get things wrong. And that same process, along with limited print space, make for a far superior selection of content. And while they have limited print space, they target an audience with a longer attention span, so the stories they do run have a high degree of detail compared to what you'll see on TV or the Internet.

WSJ is a great newspaper.

You don't even necessarily need to get the news paper, just check your source and make sure it's a credible source.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artradley
If a person just read the WSJ or NYT every day they would be better (and more accurately) informed that 95% of the populace. If they read both each day they would be better informed than 99.99%.

Frankly, if someone just read any major newspaper every day - LA Times, Washing Post, etc - and ignored all other media they would be far better informed than the vast majority of people. Newspapers have time to vet their sources, pass through editors, etc and so they rarely get things wrong. And that same process, along with limited print space, make for a far superior selection of content. And while they have limited print space, they target an audience with a longer attention span, so the stories they do run have a high degree of detail compared to what you'll see on TV or the Internet.

WSJ is a great newspaper.
Most importantly most don't lie intentionally if they do get a story wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artradley
the NY Times is filled with propaganda and lies, you would be sadly misinformed if you read that Bolshevik toilet paper
 
What about getting a handy?
What about it?

You offering?

What do you want to know?

From a WSJ reporter?

It's not as good as a mouth hug.

didn't say anything about it

while reading the paper?

etc.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT