ADVERTISEMENT

I simply do not know what to think......Now NBC's poll shows this.........

I keep telling you I don't think it's with the county's....

Your conspiracy theory is that the state website is changing the numbers submitted by the county supervisors of elections, and NONE of them, and NONE of their staff, have noticed the discrepancy?

you-sure-really.gif


You can actually check these numbers yourself. Why are you sitting on this blockbuster story?!
 
Your conspiracy theory is that the state website is changing the numbers submitted by the county supervisors of elections, and NONE of them, and NONE of their staff, have noticed the discrepancy?

you-sure-really.gif


You can actually check these numbers yourself. Why are you sitting on this blockbuster story?!

Lol.....just pure coincidence he has a history of voter suppression and when did the weird numbers start? 2022? Hmmm ....same year as this state law

 
How ignorant are you? I guess if you only get your news from corrupt sources it makes sense you are pathetically uninformed.

Why do Democrats oppose election integrity measures?

Why do Democrats want to shroud the election process in secrecy and give everyone less confidence about the results? Why?

New California law bars cities from implementing voter ID requirements​


Democrats sue to block new Georgia rule requiring hand-count of Election Day ballots​


Well, first of all that law applies to only CA city elections. Secondly, to register to vote in CA you must provide a qualified ID that would have required a SSN to obtain. Thirdly, CA mails general election ballots to all of their registered voters who have already shown proof of eligibility through the registration process. That leads me to believe only a very small percentage of CA voters actually vote at the polls actually so why should those voters at polling places have to show ID when everyone else votes at home with no such requirement?

The last link is absurd. You really think hand counting is superior to machine counting? The reverse has been proven time after time, machine counting is nearly 100% reliable and humans are really poor at hand counting election results. Imagine the angst and anger that will spill from the GOP while Georgia fiddles around with hand counting. It will take weeks, perhaps months to compile their hand counted results which will have an error margin that's unacceptable. You have to be joking here.
 
So are you now saying there actually are fewer Democratic voters in Florida?

This started with your conspiracy theory that the numbers on the Secretary of State’s site were fraudulent.

I'm saying it's probably a combination of a few things....him targeting anyone not Republican and/or not posting correct numbers manipulation of the numbers from the counties. Do you really think the counties have jurisdiction over the state?
 
I'm saying it's probably a combination of a few things....

xU3ctNZ.png


him targeting anyone not Republican and/or not posting correct numbers manipulation of the numbers from the counties. Do you really think the counties have jurisdiction over the state?

The county supervisor of elections has jurisdiction over the votes and voter registration in their county.

Again, the numbers are there for you to pore over:


Scroll down and you get historical reports, including lists added and removed by county.

It is a combination of things, but not a conspiracy. Someone in the other thread said, 'you don't have to re-register to vote' and I linked articles to the law you've cited, explaining how and on what criteria rolls are culled.

There's also the reported partisan divide of those moving to Florida, and a disproportionate share are Republican. Considering since 2020 that roughly 2 million people have moved out of Florida, it doesn't seem unreasonable to think a disproportionate number of them were Democrats.
 
Or maybe it's to throw it in Trump's face
If she could speak like Barack Obama, or had shown an ability to answer a question directly, I would absolutely say it was to throw it in Trump's face, and why not?

But she hasn't shown she can speak like Obama, and hasn't shown she can answer a question directly. in this interview, she's going to get one more chance to answer how she's going to bring prices down for average Americans, and she cannot go into a story about coming from a middle class family and that prices are too high. She could win votes by answering that question and others at least somewhat directly. 80% of the audience will be hostile, she's not winning them, 15% will be friendly, she's already won them. 2-5% could be influenced, and she could win them by giving plausible answers (not even great ones).
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT