I did. It was pretty good.Jesus dude no one is reading all that
I did. It was pretty good.Jesus dude no one is reading all that
What an incredible take. Jok!?Naming players is not the same as naming players that saw tools added to their game. Example: Did "Jok" really add tools or did he get better at what he already was because a D1 athlete has scheduled practice times and all coaches can offer that. Did Fran add something to Jok or did 4 more years with a focus on basketball add something.
Hopefully you realize 38ish percent find some merit in the question and maybe there is more truth in the middle than you care to admit.
I mean we have certain guys like Jok and Bohannon that could shoot the lights out and not really do anything else at a good big ten guard level.What an incredible take. Jok!?
You recall that Jok led the Big Ten in scoring his senior season on 38% three point shooting? That he was a Second Team All Big Ten player his junior year and First Team his senior year? That he basically single handedly led an Iowa team comprised entirely of true freshmen and sophomores to a winning record in the Big Ten? That after losing basically only Jok, Iowa went 4-14 in the Big Ten the following season?
Jok is maybe the most underrated/least talked about Fran player on these boards. Dude was an absolute stud.. but you think he should have done what? Dunked more? Taken more midrange jumpers? You’re citing the guy who was amongst the best in the Fran era at the second most efficient shot in basketball and saying he should have “added tools” … what?
Jok was a wing at 6’6, and the most common Iowa starting lineup his senior season featured him at the 3:I mean we have certain guys like Jok and Bohannon that could shoot the lights out and not really do anything else at a good big ten guard level.
Lol at giving Frank Garza the credit for Luka.Poll question to add your opinion to this statement.
If you look at Frans Tenure it's good not great anyway you cut it and I can't think of a single player, not named McCaffrey, Fran made better. Luka and the twins got better because of the work they put in on the off season, if "Bill" was the coach they could have done that. Even a guy like jbo was a notorious gym rat.
Wasn’t Jok a 2?But if we go three through the five, Iowa has been an absolute powerhouse the past decade. Jok, Wieskamp, Garza, Cook, White, Uthoff, Rebraca, Baer, Woodbury.
For a good part of the year JU was a candidate for the Naismith award as the nations top player, before Garza and Murray, so yea, saying guys don't improve under Fran is lunacy....Total troll poll. Took all of three seconds to think of one player that improved under Fran. And no doubt there are others, lol.
Jarrod Uthoff -- 7.6 PPG in first year, to 18.9 PPG in final year.
I think Jok was mostly a 3. Bohannon and Moss were the starting guards at the end. And clemmons and Gesell were the starting guards at the beginning.Wasn’t Jok a 2?
Jok had a ton more in his bag than Bohannon.I mean we have certain guys like Jok and Bohannon that could shoot the lights out and not really do anything else at a good big ten guard level.
Whatever you call it Jok was the main ballhandler his senior year.I think Jok was mostly a 3. Bohannon and Moss were the starting guards at the end. And clemmons and Gesell were the starting guards at the beginning.
Yea. That’s fair. He was a pure scorer not just a shooter. Was just saying he wasn’t really a good defender or creater for others.Whatever you call it Jok was the main ballhandler his senior year.
That is called genetics. I had 4 kids. All 4 were athletes of varying levels from division 3 to division 1. I did nothing different with any. His kids did have the advantage of being at high level practices and access to gyms, 24/7.I am pretty sure you can throw in a third father that has had a lot to do with the team being decent the last five years.
Like Fran or not...he has raised and taught two D1 players...and most likely a third. Not many fathers can say that.
I want to win as much as the next guy...but would rather be decent with a team full of kids I want to root for than great and having to grit my teeth to root for them.
We can be pissed at Alford and Pierce...then at the same time be upset our current coach goes for character first?
Imagine Pierce does not do the second stupid thing. That 2005-06 team was a fantastic supporting cast that got a third seed with out the player there were built around supporting.
I started watching Iowa BB when Lute was the coach....great coach. I would even say that Lute was an elite level coach. Dr. Tom is probably my favorite all time Iow BB coach.....tons of respect and admiration for him. That said, I think that, generally, Fran has reached that level of success.Fans today don’t know how exciting Iowa basketball was with Lute and Dr Tom. They have gotten used to mediocrity.
I don’t hate Fran but I agree more and more that he’s hit his ceiling. We have seen him field great teams and even have great seasons but then they crash and burn come tourney time.
And now we are in a rebuilding year after getting nowhere yet again with a good team.
I guess it’s are you OK with ‘pretty good’ but never great. Fran seems to be. He would have addressed defense by now if he really wanted his teams to dominate. It’s such a glaringly obvious weakness. But that could also come down to recruiting and athleticism - can’t quite get those elite athletes that can lock down other elite athletes. Maybe, idk.
Agree with much except the 'generally reached that level of success'. How? I guess you could argue we got really close to s16 with our OT loss to TN.I started watching Iowa BB when Lute was the coach....great coach. I would even say that Lute was an elite level coach. Dr. Tom is probably my favorite all time Iow BB coach.....tons of respect and admiration for him. That said, I think that, generally, Fran has reached that level of success.
I also believe that one of the most exciting things about college sports is the ability for teams to get hot and playing at a high level at the right time so they end up making great runs.......I still think Fran is capable of that.
Iowa (during the time frame mentioned Lute to Fran) has always been an institution that holds itself accountable to playing by and within the rules. That has handicapped Iowa coaches at times, and I am okay with that. Winning by cheating isn't really winning.
I think that IF...big IF, Iowa can get the NIL thing figured out so that our coaches are on a relatively even playing field with competitors that we will be okay. I think Fran has been on a slow but sure upward trend with recruiting but now NIL is another challenge/barrier that Iowa/Fran/Kirk have to work extra hard to overcome. Let's hope it doesn't derail Iowa athletics.
Recruiting and athleticism would help a lot.Fans today don’t know how exciting Iowa basketball was with Lute and Dr Tom. They have gotten used to mediocrity.
I don’t hate Fran but I agree more and more that he’s hit his ceiling. We have seen him field great teams and even have great seasons but then they crash and burn come tourney time.
And now we are in a rebuilding year after getting nowhere yet again with a good team.
I guess it’s are you OK with ‘pretty good’ but never great. Fran seems to be. He would have addressed defense by now if he really wanted his teams to dominate. It’s such a glaringly obvious weakness. But that could also come down to recruiting and athleticism - can’t quite get those elite athletes that can lock down other elite athletes. Maybe, idk.
Of Lute? No.Fran has reached that level of success
Yep, I was specifically referring to Dr. Tom. And in his last year he got to the Sweet 16 with his own players....but that is just one measuring stick (Sweet 16).....if this year or in the next couple Fran makes that run to the Sweet 16 or Elite 8.......I think it's still "generally" in the same ballpark with the good Dr. A final 4 by Lute at Iowa and his subsequent success at Arizona, as I mentioned, I think puts him in the Elite category (National Championship). I'm not putting Fran in that category.Agree with much except the 'generally reached that level of success'. How? I guess you could argue we got really close to s16 with our OT loss to TN.
Lute got to the Final Four, and although Dr. Tom's 'middle years' do kinda look like Fran's in some ways, his career is also book ended by two S16 appearances (and a Elite 8.) Can't give Fran a pass for getting close but no cigar.
I will give you that Fran has surpassed Alford though.
I think that if you gave Fran the talent that the good Dr. inherited from Raveling....we would have seen pretty similar results. That's my guess anyway.Of Lute? No.
And certainly not the level of success Dr. Tom had pre-90s.
Although Jordan is also the Iowa career leader in assists and free throw percentage. Clearly an uncoached player.I mean we have certain guys like Jok and Bohannon that could shoot the lights out and not really do anything else at a good big ten guard level.
Never said he was uncoached. And you got to look at assists per game to compare. Andre Woolridge 5.9 assist/per game, Dean Oliver 4.5, Lester 4.8, BJ Armstrong 4.0. I think Bohannon is around 3.9.Although Jordan is also the Iowa career leader in assists and free throw percentage. Clearly an uncoached player.
Most of the cumulative offensive records will be Frans players because of the pace of play.Never said he was uncoached. And you got to look at assists per game to compare. Andre Woolridge 5.9 assist/per game, Dean Oliver 4.5, Lester 4.8, BJ Armstrong 4.0. I think Bohannon is around 3.9.
Woolridge was on a different planet. He was amazing. Dean Oliver was a heck of a player too.Most of the cumulative offensive records will be Frans players because of the pace of play.
When you play six years with Jok, Cook, Garza, Weiskamp, and Keegan Murray as the guy brings the ball over half court, stops and passes it to them you're going to rack up some assists.
Thats not even in the same ballpark as a Woolridge who had to create most of his own scoring and most of his teammates opportunities off the dribble.
I would still take Wooldridge over any hawkeye in my time if I get one player to put on a team.
Loved Dean so much - if his 3 was better he would have been unstoppableWoolridge was on a different planet. He was amazing. Dean Oliver was a heck of a player too.
Do you remember Garza his freshman year? Yes, he gets credit for all his work but Fran gets no credit for his improvement as well as the Murray’s. Come on!So vote No. If you really want to spice it up, vote no, and explain why you feel that way.
Look at that roster BNG. He would be a dead man walking if we didn't have those 3 guys the last few years. At minimum this would be his hot seat year IMO.
Do you remember Garza his freshman year? Yes, he gets credit for all his work but Fran gets no credit for his improvement as well as the Murray’s. Come on!
I get it. Fran gets no credit and it’s all the player! Good Lord! No credit for Rebraca either, right?Give Fran credit for the system that Fed Garza the ball in low post and that gave Keegan free reign to run the offense.
As far as development, Fran coaches a system, all the individual work outs are the players themselves with some direction from coaches/family. IF Fran were such a great development coach, CMAC wouldn't have spent 5 years shooting bricks and PMAC wouldn't have a shooting form that starts wth the ball at his hip. A good development coach would have insisted PMAC toughen up and play defense/rebound/play his size in the paint. Instead PMAC is a 6'9 perimeter guy that can't guard his position and lacks the tougness to play inside the paint.
It is the players individually...and their choices.....Keegan and Kris identical twins....Papa tried to get both boys to shoot with right hand even though natural left handers....Keegan took to it and became ambidextrous and 1st round NBA draft choice...Kris didn't and it really limits his game that he can only finish with his strong left hand.
I have a different perspective. CMAC played two sports, dealt with some very limiting injury issues.....but during his entire career brought something to the team that others didn't have in their tool box based on his background. The two sport, significant injury part limited Connor's ability to show on the court what he is capable of.......this year, he's been really good (in spite of the occasional off game).Give Fran credit for the system that Fed Garza the ball in low post and that gave Keegan free reign to run the offense.
As far as development, Fran coaches a system, all the individual work outs are the players themselves with some direction from coaches/family. IF Fran were such a great development coach, CMAC wouldn't have spent 5 years shooting bricks and PMAC wouldn't have a shooting form that starts wth the ball at his hip. A good development coach would have insisted PMAC toughen up and play defense/rebound/play his size in the paint. Instead PMAC is a 6'9 perimeter guy that can't guard his position and lacks the tougness to play inside the paint.
It is the players individually...and their choices.....Keegan and Kris identical twins....Papa tried to get both boys to shoot with right hand even though natural left handers....Keegan took to it and became ambidextrous and 1st round NBA draft choice...Kris didn't and it really limits his game that he can only finish with his strong left hand.