ADVERTISEMENT

If you could dissuade people from reading one book which would it be?

The state owns all property.

What do you think he meant?

I think you can read the Communist Manifesto without becoming a communist. There is some interesting thoughts on there that are worth pondering on.

I believe that in the Communist Manifesto he mentioned not being opposed to the proletariat (working class) using wages to by some land or a home. He would be against the wealthy owning land as a show of wealth or to enrich themselves off the working class.

That's interesting to think about in today's environment. Especially during covid with corporations and wealthy people snagging up affordable housing and making it more expensive to buy or rent. A way to think about that is the wealthy class bought land to further enrich themselves while reducing the wealth of workers. It's hard to argue that isn't what is happening now.
 
I think you can read the Communist Manifesto without becoming a communist. There is some interesting thoughts on there that are worth pondering on.

I believe that in the Communist Manifesto he mentioned not being opposed to the proletariat (working class) using wages to by some land or a home. He would be against the wealthy owning land as a show of wealth or to enrich themselves off the working class.

That's interesting to think about in today's environment. Especially during covid with corporations and wealthy people snagging up affordable housing and making it more expensive to buy or rent. A way to think about that is the wealthy class bought land to further enrich themselves while reducing the wealth of workers. It's hard to argue that isn't what is happening now.

I read most of the "Communist Manifesto" in high school. I probably can't remember most of it.

I don't think any human should be super rich. I don't think anyone needs more than $1 million a year.

But, Marx's idea about abolishing capitalism is nuts. It's never worked. Most economists don't take his theories seriously.

IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bcherod and Moral
I think you can read the Communist Manifesto without becoming a communist. There is some interesting thoughts on there that are worth pondering on.

I believe that in the Communist Manifesto he mentioned not being opposed to the proletariat (working class) using wages to by some land or a home. He would be against the wealthy owning land as a show of wealth or to enrich themselves off the working class.

That's interesting to think about in today's environment. Especially during covid with corporations and wealthy people snagging up affordable housing and making it more expensive to buy or rent. A way to think about that is the wealthy class bought land to further enrich themselves while reducing the wealth of workers. It's hard to argue that isn't what is happening now.
This level headed, reasonable response is really gonna trigger our free speech absolutists on the board.
 
I read most of the "Communist Manifesto" in high school. I probably can't remember most of it.

I don't think any human should be super rich. I don't think anyone needs more than $1 million a year.

But, Marx's idea about abolishing capitalism is nuts. It's never worked. Most economists don't take his theories seriously.

IMO.

I'm personally like a good mix of the isms. They counter each other well if done correctly.
 
Chapterhouse Dune

Dune is the best science fiction book I ever read. Herbert wrote sequels but by the time it got to the fifth it was totally off the rails. Just sayin

His son wrote some interesting spinoffs fwiw.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: seminoleed
There are two that I would advise are a waste of time. Both are long, depressing, and while each is highly acclaimed, they are simply not worth the effort:

-Of Human Bondage by W Somerset Maugham

-An American Tragedy by Theodore Dreiser

Allow me to add all of the books written by the Marquiss de Sade. He is tedious and has a not very interesting writing style. Frankly reading about the fantasy world and private lives of Libertines is simply far less interesting than doing some exploring of you own.
 
I actually read American Psycho, after seeing the movie, and having been told it was an amazing satire piece, etc, etc.

I thought the book's meager redeming qualities were totally overshadowed by its pornographic murder/torture scenes. In short, that book is trash, and worthy of being labeled "obscenity"; to paraphrase Justice Potter Stewart, "I know it when I see it", and in my opinion if that book isn't obscene, then I don't know what is.

FWIW. I studied English literature in college and consider myself to be a fairly well-read individual.
I had just moved to NYC when that book came out. I thought it was hilarious! It probably has not held up well though.
 
I think he's a socialist.
What's that mean? He wants a group of people who are collectively paid by tax payers whose job it is to put out fires in homes? Or maybe people who are collectively paid by tax payers to find criminals, catch them, and then put them in jail? Or possibly he doesn't want everyone to be complete idiots so he wants to ensure everyone has access to a quality education paid for, you guessed, by the tax payers.

Sounds horrible. But hey, at least you have it so if you get sick there is a real possibility it will end you financially.
 
What's that mean? He wants a group of people who are collectively paid by tax payers whose job it is to put out fires in homes? Or maybe people who are collectively paid by tax payers to find criminals, catch them, and then put them in jail? Or possibly he doesn't want everyone to be complete idiots so he wants to ensure everyone has access to a quality education paid for, you guessed, by the tax payers.

Sounds horrible. But hey, at least you have it so if you get sick there is a real possibility it will end you financially.

It means he's a devotee of Karl Marx. Ask him. :)
 
Why would you want to discourage anyone from reading anything?...
Well, if someone knows my likes and dislikes, I'd hope they wouldn't recommend something I wouldn't enjoy. Caveat: I basically only read fiction, so it's easier to know what I might like or hate. Having said that, I'm actually reading the Van Halen autobiography right now, and I highly recommend if you like rock 'n' roll and insider stories of such. Much better than the Phil Collins one that came out a few years ago.
 
I'm pretty sure @What Would Jesus Do? wants us to follow Marx's plan.
I'm still waiting for someone to outline that plan.

By which I mean actually outline the plan - as opposed to spouting wingnutty talking points.

Marx was one of 3 revolutionary thinkers of the 19th century who changed conventional ways of looking at the world. The other 2 were Darwin and Freud.

Marx's primary revolutionary thought was that labor has value. The capitalist who builds the factory has some ownership in the products made, and the workers who actually make them also have some ownership. Prior to Marx the capitalist was held to own it all.

We all accept this Marxist perspective today, to some degree. Not much, but some.

The private property that Marx objected to was the ownership of what is sometimes called the commons, not your toothbrush or home. Natural resources, for example. The idea that you own an oil well because your great great whatever stole it makes little sense, but we base our culture on those "values." Marx's view was that the "ownership" of these resources would be held in common and that the resources would be shared.

Marx objects to exploitation of people. Capitalism defends the right to exploit people.

I don't consider myself a Marxist, but obviously he got some things right (or at least better than the prevalent thinking).
 
That's a brisk clip. What are some of your favorites? What genres of fiction do you like most?

I was all over the place but I think the themes are common. I read a handful of the criminal behavioral type books by Douglas and Olshaker. Escaping the Cult by Rachel Warren that was about the FLDS and Warren family. American Fascists by Chris Hedges about christofascists and dominionists. Some Howard Zinn, and even more Noam Chomsky, I have a ways to go before I finish all of his. A few other few cult books.

Fiction wise I like dark dystopian type books. They can be horror or sci-fi. I read about every Cherie Priest book last year, I especially like the ones in the Clockwork Century series. The first in that series is Boneshaker. I have also nearly completed all of Stephen King books. The Long Walk by Richard Bachmann aka Stephen King was amazing.
 
neverending story page GIF


The Never Ending Story......that shit has real consequences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole777
I was all over the place but I think the themes are common. I read a handful of the criminal behavioral type books by Douglas and Olshaker. Escaping the Cult by Rachel Warren that was about the FLDS and Warren family. American Fascists by Chris Hedges about christofascists and dominionists. Some Howard Zinn, and even more Noam Chomsky, I have a ways to go before I finish all of his. A few other few cult books.

Fiction wise I like dark dystopian type books. They can be horror or sci-fi. I read about every Cherie Priest book last year, I especially like the ones in the Clockwork Century series. The first in that series is Boneshaker. I have also nearly completed all of Stephen King books. The Long Walk by Richard Bachmann aka Stephen King was amazing.
I don't normally go for horror or zombies, but Boneshaker sounds like it could be fun. I've put it on my list.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Moral
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT