ADVERTISEMENT

If you support Hillary tell us why!!!!!!

She's sneaky, slippery and will out strategize the bad guys. Transparency and authenticity have met their match. Claire Underwood will be a hell of a President. The rest of the cast will faint when Putain says jump, but Clinton will have him in her dungeon.

How was that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
She's sneaky, slippery and will out strategize the bad guys. Transparency and authenticity have met their match. Claire Underwood will be a hell of a President. The rest of the cast will faint when Putain says jump, but Clinton will have him in her dungeon.

How was that?
Not your best work. Sorry.
 
I've said for months she's going to run away with the general, but I agree, she's rather underwhelming.

I won't vote for her. But I also still think she's going to clobber whoever is on the R ticket.
 
Current polls do not indicate this.

Yes. Because polls in the previous October really are the barometer. I'm so happy paying those 9-9-9 taxes.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/herman-cain-tops-mitt-romney-in-latest-cbs-nyt-poll/

Or that Hillary is going for that elusive 3rd term.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/02/AR2007100202365.html


I honestly have no clue who Thompson is...

http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/11/21/us-usa-poll-politics-idUSN2061107620071121

"In the Republican race, Giuliani widened his lead over Thompson to 14 points, 29 percent to 15 percent, compared to last month's 28 percent to 20 percent lead.

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee jumped over former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney into third place. Huckabee had 11 percent, with Romney and Arizona Sen. John McCain at 9 percent."


We're a year out. But I'm still pretty confident it will be Hillary and it won't be close. Unless Biden/Romney jump in, there's just no one else who the majority of Americans will find electable.
 
If you are for any of the republicans, then all I can say is that you are correct.

You are brain dead.

What if you are for the Democrats? Is she really your best option? A lying, 1%er ? Who is totally in bed with "Wall Street" ?
 
12141650_10153759121271336_178127938478925808_n.jpg
 
Yes. Because polls in the previous October really are the barometer. I'm so happy paying those 9-9-9 taxes.



I honestly have no clue who Thompson is...

http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/11/21/us-usa-poll-politics-idUSN2061107620071121

"In the Republican race, Giuliani widened his lead over Thompson to 14 points, 29 percent to 15 percent, compared to last month's 28 percent to 20 percent lead.
That would be Fred Dalton Thompson, actor and former US Senator from Tennessee. I actually kind of liked him among the GOP candidates at the time.

Had he won, he would've been our tallest president (he's 6'6").
 
What's interesting is these same polls all had Biden beating all of the Republicans. I wonder if he gets pressured to enter the race.
I would like to see who administered that foxnews poll. Sounds to me that the folks at fox want Joe to jump in and give the H-train some troubles.
 
That would be Fred Dalton Thompson, actor and former US Senator from Tennessee. I actually kind of liked him among the GOP candidates at the time.

Had he won, he would've been our tallest president (he's 6'6").

He also played District Attorney Arthur Branch on Law and Order.
 
Ok. You can have those 4 and I'll take Clinton. If it's someone other than those 5, no one wins. If it's Clinton, you go back to the FSU board. If it's one of those 4, I'll never post here again.

Nah you can't leave. Who else am I going to argue over Tiger Woods with?
 
Polls are meaningless in October. What isn't meaningless is the ground game Hillary Clinton is running. She has adopted a lot of the strategies used by Barack Obama and has large organizations of volunteers in critical early states. National polls are neat, and if they show a close race they get more air time. What doesn't get air time, but does win primaries and general elections is volunteers on the ground calling people, or going door to door in their neighborhood.
Clinton has large organizations in Iowa, South Carolina, and Nevada. No candidate on either side has a ground game to match Clinton's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Polls are meaningless in October. What isn't meaningless is the ground game Hillary Clinton is running. She has adopted a lot of the strategies used by Barack Obama and has large organizations of volunteers in critical early states. National polls are neat, and if they show a close race they get more air time. What doesn't get air time, but does win primaries and general elections is volunteers on the ground calling people, or going door to door in their neighborhood.
Clinton has large organizations in Iowa, South Carolina, and Nevada. No candidate on either side has a ground game to match Clinton's.

Another thing I think to factor in is the Hillary hate factor. Similar to the Obama rock star factor his first go around I think a lot of people who normally won't vote will just to vote against her.
 
Another thing I think to factor in is the Hillary hate factor. Similar to the Obama rock star factor his first go around I think a lot of people who normally won't vote will just to vote against her.
People don't bother to show up at the polls to vote against someone. They show up to vote for someone. Clinton is in good shape for 2016 if the Republican candidate is one of the front runners. It's the 8 percent or below candidates not named Huckabee or Gilmore that could beat her.
 
Hillary may not be perfect, but she's light years better than any of the clowns seeking the Republican nomination, and she's clearly the most qualified of any of the candidates from either party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulldogs1974
She's sneaky, slippery and will out strategize the bad guys. Transparency and authenticity have met their match. Claire Underwood will be a hell of a President. The rest of the cast will faint when Putain says jump, but Clinton will have him in her dungeon.

How was that?

That's actually not bad. I don't care for her personally, but having a cut-throat bitch as president isn't a bad idea. It's not like we're voting on the person we'd most want to have over for dinner.
On the other hand if she let this republican cast of boobs catch her up with this email server stuff she's no spy-master.

Mostly though I don't care for her because she WANTS it too much. There aren't many right reasons to seek the office but personal pride is one of the worst.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Hillary may not be perfect, but she's light years better than any of the clowns seeking the Republican nomination, and she's clearly the most qualified of any of the candidates from either party.

Holy crap. Just when I thought my view of you couldn't get any worse, you go and post this gem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeye54545
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT