Influencers Being Paid To Push Sexual Attacks On Harris
September 9, 2024Semafor reports:
Read the full article. There’s much more. No paywall.
Influencers Being Paid To Push Sexual Attacks On Harris
- Thread starter NoleATL
- Start date
Semafor reports:
When George Santos says you’ve gone too far…….there’s your sign.
I’d bet it’s as real as your psychosis.
Says the guy who lies in thread titles.
Find any evidence the school district allowed pride flags?
It’s a ‘sexual smear’ even if it’s true, right?
Sort of like ‘malinformation’.
Still here, E-bike?! Though you'd be napping by now after Saturday's debacle lowered your immunity! 🤣
Going to the mighty Troy game too? Beat that scabby chest after a big 3 point bounce back win?!?! 🤣 🤣 🤣
Cute little WarmUp, like a child begging for attention. Lulz. Owned fattie.
Are you asking if the party running a candidate that actually SA'd people and paid off a porn star lacks the decency to pay people to push sexual attacks?Dear repubs,
Jesus clearly said the gloves are off when you're dealing with evil.Dear repubs,
Harris was 29 in March 1994 when a San Francisco Chronicle columnist described her as Brown’s “new steady,” going on to say that she was “something new in Willie’s love life. She’s a woman, not a girl.” At the time, Brown, who was then 60 years old and speaker of the California State Assembly, had been estranged from his wife for more than a decade.
https://www.factcheck.org/2024/08/posts-mislead-about-harris-romance-with-willie-brown/
So sex while dating is now disqualifying for the Presidency? How deeply are we digging into candidates backgrounds to see if they’ve had sex with people they’re not married to? Seems Trump could have issues, too….or is it just that women are whores?
Not to me, my question was, “what is being called a ‘smear’”?
If someone relays the fact that 29 year old Harris slept with married, 60 year old Willie Brown before he appointed her to a job, is that a ‘sexual smear’?
You know, I've kept you off ignore so far as you're amusing but you've gotten as bad as PF
if a calendar is your only evidence, you don't have much.. if this were true, trump would really bother you then and harris is the only logical vote. thanks for clearing that up.
Your question is stupid. Just like the people who believe or spread this smear.
She dated someone 30 years ago and jackasses like you like in imply that all her success is due to sexual favors. It's gross and you're gross.
I figured it was up your alley.
Hey look, the answer. That wasn’t so hard.
So you genuinely believe that a 29 year old dating a married 60 year didn’t help her get that appointment?
You really think it would have gone to her regardless?
Evidence of their relationship? No one disputes it.
I was simply asking if that was the ‘smear’, or there was some other story about her ****ing a piece of furniture or something like that out there that I hadn’t seen yet.
I don’t give a shit about any of that.
I’m voting against the neocons.
Harris keeps getting their endorsements.
So you're of the opinion that Newsom provided sexual favors to Brown too? Brown helped him early in his career. And all aid must be based on sexual services, right? Or just women?I figured it was up your alley.
Hey look, the answer. That wasn’t so hard.
So you genuinely believe that a 29 year old dating a married 60 year didn’t help her get that appointment?
You really think it would have gone to her regardless?
Is it a sexual smear against Trump to say he was found liable for sexual assault, or is that just a fact?
Would the Trump campaign correctly identify it as ‘malinformation’ since it was true, but distracted from their preferred narrative?
Trying to keep up the ‘cognitive infrastructure’ against all these influence peddlers.
There’s a jury verdict finding him liable for sexual assault. You get all that comes with that.
Very different from casting aspersions on someone for legal conduct years ago - calling them a slut, “Heels Up Harris” among other things.
If you truly don’t see the difference you’re hopeless.
I always understood a smear to be a false allegation.
e.g. Propagating a lie that Harris ****ed a piece of furniture would be spreading a sexual smear.
That’s only appropriate if the candidate is a Republican, right?
I was asking what the smear was, because we know the stuff about sleeping with AARP members in her 20s wasn’t false, I figured there was some other story out there that was untrue that was being spread.
TV time is really expensive. Are people paying for those spots just to pull in random factoids? No, everything in there has a purpose unless those making the ads are just interesting setting cash on fire.
Thanks for that. Now I know you should be ignored. You add zero other than maga talking points.
Are you trying to compare innuendo with something in the public record; namely, a guilty verdict? That is stupid.
The sadder part is he thinks he's being clever.
Incels who have given up trying to have any sort of relationship with women will do anything they can to paint them in a negative light. Looking at themselves in any sort of reflective way is nothing short of impossible for them.
