ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa bill seeks to ban social-emotional learning, but educators say it’s critical to kids’ development

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,477
60,603
113
Deplorable. Iowa Republicans are out of control(Actually the problem is that they are in control)!:

Fourth-grade teacher Emily Stamp is helping students at Washington Elementary School in Mount Vernon to identify their feelings, and teaching strategies they can use to manage those feelings to be productive learners.


Stamp teaches them that “no feelings are bad” and helps them find the words to label their feelings so they can get back to academics. In her classroom, students can take breaks to recenter themselves by practicing breathing exercises or playing with play dough — “strategies we have to bring ourselves to get to a place where we can be productive and present,” Stamp said.


Learning like this — which happens in almost all Iowa classrooms — is the target of a new bill, House File 85, in the Iowa Legislature that would require the Iowa Department of Education to scrap its guidance on social-emotional learning, a framework adopted from the Center for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning, which grew out of an idea from the Yale University’s Child Study Center and launched as a nationwide collaborative in 1994.


Advertisement

The bill would require parents to give consent before a student can take any surveys that include topics such as political or religious affiliations, sexual behavior, relationships with family members or mental health problems. Parents now can opt-out of these surveys.


According to the Iowa Department of Education, social and emotional learning “is the process through which children and adults acquire and effectively apply the knowledge, attitudes, and skills necessary to understand and manage emotions, set and achieve positive goals, feel and show empathy for others, establish and maintain positive relationships, and make responsible decisions.”


The bill was introduced by Iowa Sen. Sandy Salmon, R-Janesville, who said social-emotional learning conflicts with many families’ religious and political beliefs.


In her newsletter, Salmon said social-emotional learning includes critical race theory, a theory that race is a social construct and racism is embedded in legal systems and policies. A new Iowa law that bans teaching “divisive concepts” such as critical race theory was signed last year.


Critical race theory doesn’t exist in K-12 systems, according to educators.


The bill is part of a larger effort by conservatives across the country to ban social-emotional learning. Last year, Florida’s education department rejected textbooks that contained what it said where prohibited topics including references to critical race theory and additions of social emotional learning in math textbooks and other “woke content,” according to a news release from Florida’s education department.


Daily News​


Newsletter Signup
checkmark-yellow.png
Delivered to your inbox every day






“If this is what some legislators want to focus on, my polite response to them is don’t ever come back to a school district again and complain about bullying, about the mental health of students, or that student’s don’t act as civil as they used to,” Mount Vernon Community School District Superintendent Greg Batenhorst said.


“We’re trying to do everything we can to help them grow socially, emotionally and academically. Taking away a school district’s ability to do that work with kids because it fits your political agenda is criminal to me,” he said.


At Washington Elementary in Mount Vernon, teachers are in their second year of piloting a curriculum called SEE-KS, which stands for Social Emotional Engagement — Knowledge and Skills, with the Grant Wood Area Education Agency and the state Department of Education.


Mount Vernon schools also implemented a social-emotional learning curriculum at the middle and high school this year called Leader in Me. The curriculum — used in many other Eastern Iowa schools — teaches students life skills such as self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills and responsible decision making.


Maggie Hartzler, director of clinical services at Tanager Place, which provides mental health treatment to children and families, said there is a misconception about what social-emotional learning is. Incorporating social-emotional learning is “so important for kids’ development, relationships and overall health,” Hartzler said. It helps students develop language to label and work through their feelings in a safe and healthy way.


An example Hartzler gave of what social emotional learning looks like in the classroom is a teacher reading a book to students and asking the question, “How do you think that character was feeling when that happened?”


In a presentation this week to the Linn-Mar Community School District, counselors talked about how social-emotional learning can help students with depression, anxiety, problems at home, thoughts of suicide and self-harm, bullying and other trauma.


Ninth-graders at Linn-Mar are taught lessons from a curriculum called Signs of Suicide. Students learn about warning signs and depression and are empowered to tell a trusted adult if they or their friends exhibit these symptoms.


Another program at Linn-Mar is 9th Grade Connections that started during the 2021-22 school year. High school freshman meet weekly with a teacher and a small group of other students to talk about life, mental health, academics and post-high school plans. The program seeks to increase positive relationships between staff and students.


Social-emotional learning also is a part of private school education. At Xavier High School in Cedar Rapids, it’s included in the school’s mission statement — “to develop the total person in a Catholic environment” — Principal Angela Olson said.


Olson said the definition of social-emotional learning is not as lawmakers define it in the proposed bill. It’s “making sure students have what they need to be able to function and function well,” she said.


College Community School District Superintendent Doug Wheeler said he’s also confused by the bill. “We’re doing what our community and businesses have asked us to do. We’re trying to be responsive to skills we’ve been told for years our students need to have,” he said.


During the 2021-22 school year, the Cedar Rapids Community School District implemented a social-emotional curriculum in all four high schools for the first time. The curriculum — called Habitudes Leadership — teaches students how to identify and manage their feelings. It also is designed to teach college and career readiness.


A social-emotional learning curriculum was already being used in Cedar Rapids elementary and middle schools.


During that same school year, Mount Vernon educators began professional learning on how to integrate social-emotional learning in to their classrooms more effectively.


“Whatever becomes of various pieces of legislation, we’ll do what schools always do,” Batenhorst said. “We’ll find a way to support kids, love them and work our tails off for them — even if people throw up roadblocks for us — because that’s what we have dedicated our lives to doing.”

 
  • Like
Reactions: pjhawk
Lol. I don't have a problem with teaching kids how to handle their emotions.

Let's not pretend though that those on the left don't bulld bullshit into efforts like this
Yeah but the problem is that your post is full of shit. No one has ever said that teachers are mental health professionals. It doesn't take a mental health professional to recognize that kids need to take a minute away to calm down, to vent emotions, to get back on track. You don't need to be a mental health professional to recognize that older children are more likely to be able to recognize those emotions or feelings on their own, while little kids cannot.

This is a perfect example of what drives the modern GOP. Take an issue that isn't problem, label it with something that people fear, and drive a wedge with that fear. This isn't a both sides issue. The left doesn't do that. The things the left fears, like abortion access and school violence, are actual problems.
 
Yeah but the problem is that your post is full of shit. No one has ever said that teachers are mental health professionals. It doesn't take a mental health professional to recognize that kids need to take a minute away to calm down, to vent emotions, to get back on track. You don't need to be a mental health professional to recognize that older children are more likely to be able to recognize those emotions or feelings on their own, while little kids cannot.

This is a perfect example of what drives the modern GOP. Take an issue that isn't problem, label it with something that people fear, and drive a wedge with that fear. This isn't a both sides issue. The left doesn't do that. The things the left fears, like abortion access and school violence, are actual problems.
That is a lot of ranting. Good for you

The left doesn't do that. Lol
 
No. You already understand the point perfectly well
No, I have no idea what you're implying in the second part of your post.

Based on your other posts it's probably best you don't say, I've read enough stupid stuff for the day.
 
No, I have no idea what you're implying in the second part of your post.

Based on your other posts it's probably best you don't say, I've read enough stupid stuff for the day.
It is mo different than pork that gets shoved into meaningful legislation by both political parties. Label it and then shove other things into it so any objection can be vilified. That is what I mean.

If all this was is providing kids with a way to manage their emotions that would be wonderful. But it unfortunately will not be used that way and instead will have left leaning perspectives promoted. I have zero doubt about that....and neither do you.
 
It is mo different than pork that gets shoved into meaningful legislation by both political parties. Label it and then shove other things into it so any objection can be vilified. That is what I mean.

If all this was is providing kids with a way to manage their emotions that would be wonderful. But it unfortunately will not be used that way and instead will have left leaning perspectives promoted. I have zero doubt about that....and neither do you.
Ah, okay. I was hoping you would imply something other than the liberal indoctrination angle that clearly doesn't exist, but I guess not.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ConvenientParking
It is mo different than pork that gets shoved into meaningful legislation by both political parties. Label it and then shove other things into it so any objection can be vilified. That is what I mean.

If all this was is providing kids with a way to manage their emotions that would be wonderful. But it unfortunately will not be used that way and instead will have left leaning perspectives promoted. I have zero doubt about that....and neither do you.
You have no evidence but your feelings. Good work.
 
So teachers are now also mental health professionals. Got it
No, they're educational professionals who (ideally) stay up to date with research on pedagogy and adopt strategies that research shows is effective in helping them educate students. Unlike lawmakers, particularly Republican douches looking to invent and make hay on social issues since they have nothing else to offer
 
No, they're educational professionals who (ideally) stay up to date with research on pedagogy and adopt strategies that research shows is effective in helping them educate students. Unlike lawmakers, particularly Republican douches looking to invent and make hay on social issues since they have nothing else to offer
What bothers me more about this bill is the complete slap in the face to expertise. Why require our teachers to be educated at all if we ignore their methods?
 
What bothers me more about this bill is the complete slap in the face to expertise. Why require our teachers to be educated at all if we ignore their methods?
Teachers are making your kids communists, says Tucker. Not people who are forgoing better paying occupations out of a desire to help kids learn. They're (the school board meeting heckling section) insane.
 
Why is it the government’s job to teach children social & emotional skills? Just going out on a limb here, but I could have sworn someone else owned that responsibility.

Is there a RACI for education?

Teach reading, writing, arithmetic:
R - Teachers
A - Teachers, administrators
C - Parents, counselors
I - Parents, Counselors

Teach social & emotional skills:
R - PARENTS, family
A - PARENTS
C - Friends, family, neighbors, teachers, church
I - Administrators, public authorities

These are different things with different charters with different Expertise requirements.

Our schools already feed, provide before, after care, have nurses. Should we just go to an all boarding school model for K-12 and just remove all responsibility from family?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TennNole17
Why is it the government’s job to teach children social & emotional skills? Just going out on a limb here, but I could have sworn someone else owned that responsibility.

Is there a RACI for education?

Teach reading, writing, arithmetic:
R - Teachers
A - Teachers, administrators
C - Parents, counselors
I - Parents, Counselors

Teach social & emotional skills:
R - PARENTS, family
A - PARENTS
C - Friends, family, neighbors, teachers, church
I - Administrators, public authorities

These are different things with different charters with different Expertise requirements.

Our schools already feed, provide before, after care, have nurses. Should we just go to an all boarding school model for K-12 and just remove all responsibility from family?
I doubt you find an educator that doesn't wish for more parent involvement with their children. Parents are dropping the ball big time and schools are picking up the slack.
 
Last edited:
Why is it the government’s job to teach children social & emotional skills? Just going out on a limb here, but I could have sworn someone else owned that responsibility.

Is there a RACI for education?

Teach reading, writing, arithmetic:
R - Teachers
A - Teachers, administrators
C - Parents, counselors
I - Parents, Counselors

Teach social & emotional skills:
R - PARENTS, family
A - PARENTS
C - Friends, family, neighbors, teachers, church
I - Administrators, public authorities

These are different things with different charters with different Expertise requirements.

Our schools already feed, provide before, after care, have nurses. Should we just go to an all boarding school model for K-12 and just remove all responsibility from family?
Because a lot of parents are sh!t. Not complicated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
A number of conservative publications and groups, including National Review and The Federalist, have criticized social-emotional learning as a "Trojan horse" used to bring in ideas such as critical race theory, sexual orientation and gender identity, and other left-wing politics to the classroom.[25] Robert Pondiscio of the right-leaning think tank the American Enterprise Institute also criticized SEL for changing "the role of the teacher, from a pedagogue to something more closely resembling a psychotherapist, social worker, or member of the clergy - no less concerned with a child's beliefs, attitudes and values."[26] Those opposed to SEL have cited CASEL's 2020 initiative, "Transformative SEL", as further evidence that SEL has left-wing political overtones; "Transformative SEL" lists among its goals "interrogating social norms, disrupting and resisting inequities, and co-constructing equitable and just solutions."[27]

 

Roy Moore​

In November 2017, The Federalist came under criticism from both conservatives and liberals for publishing an opinion piece by Tully Borland, Ouachita Baptist University philosopher, defending Roy Moore for dating teenagers while he was in his 30s, and arguing that such behavior was "not without some merit if one wants to raise a large family".[22][14] Noah Rothman of the conservative Commentary magazine stated that the op-ed was "rationalizing away child molestation".[22] Molly Roberts of The Washington Post wrote that the op-ed was "uniquely awful".[23] Ben Domenech defended The Federalist for publishing Borland's op-ed saying the magazine "remains avowedly committed to offering alternative views. For those that have a problem with this, the question is simple: what are you afraid of?"[24]


"Black crime" tag​

Until October 2017, The Federalist had a "black crime" tag, which aggregated articles related to criminal activity by African Americans.[25][26] Dan McLaughlin of National Review, a former Federalist contributor, said that the phrasing of the "black crime" tag was "unfortunate", that when he had written for The Federalist he had "never even noticed that there were tags at the bottom of my essays," and that The Federalist "had deleted the tag as soon as it attracted any notice—over a couple of years the tag appeared on only five or six posts."[27]


Andrew McCabe​

In May 2018, The Federalist published an article which suggested that former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe had leaked a story to the news channel CNN.[28] The article presented no evidence that this was the case, only that McCabe was aware that CNN would publish a story four days prior to its eventual publication.[28] According to Matt Ford in The New Republic, the more likely explanation was that CNN contacted the FBI Press Office, consistent with journalistic practices, for comment on a forthcoming story.[28] George W. Bush's former press secretary Ari Fleischer agreed that CNN was likely contacting the FBI for comment on a forthcoming story, and said that "Whoever told CNN about the briefing is the problem."[28] The Federalist story was widely disseminated, including a tweet from Donald Trump Jr.[28]


COVID-19 pandemic misinformation​

During the COVID-19 pandemic, The Federalist published numerous pieces that contained false information or information that was contrary to the recommendations of public health experts and authorities.[5][29] The Federalist published articles denouncing social distancing, as well as articles claiming that fears over the pandemic had been overhyped by the Democratic Party and the media. The Federalist co-founder Sean Davis said that Democrats were intentionally trying to "destroy the economy" as a "last-ditch 2020 play", and that "All they care about is power. And if they have to destroy your life and business to get power back, they will." The Federalist published articles calling on the government to quickly end social distancing directions, and to open businesses again.[29] Co-founder Domenech attacked a prominent analysis from Imperial College London which estimated the loss of life due to the pandemic; Domenech attacked the analysis for revising its figures downward, but the reason that the analysis did so was that the analysis incorporated the social distancing and shutdown strategies that had increasingly been implemented.[30] Robert Tracinski, a former contributor, wrote in The Bulwark that The Federalist had devolved over time into a "conspiracy-mongering partisan rag that has now become a menace to public health".[30]

It published a piece by a person identified as a physician in Oregon who recommended that people hold chickenpox-style parties for the coronavirus to build herd immunity, but the recommendations were contrary to those of public health experts, and the author in question did not have a medical license and had worked as a businessman for decades.[29][31][32] At the time, experts warned that the number of new infections should be kept down so as to not overburden the health care system.[33] The Federalist was subsequently temporarily suspended from Twitter for promoting fringe ideas that contradicted public health experts and were harmful to public health.[32] Reddit also removed links to The Federalist article on its platform.[34]

The Federalist has published articles opposing COVID-19 vaccine mandates and articles suggesting that pregnant women should not receive COVID-19 vaccines.[35]
 

Climate change misinformation​

In November 2021, a study by the Center for Countering Digital Hate described The Federalist as being among "ten fringe publishers" that together were responsible for nearly 70 percent of Facebook user interactions with content that denied climate change. Facebook disputed the study's methodology.[36][37]


Allegations of labor law violation​

In 2019, following staff of other American media companies unionizing, co-founder Domenech tweeted "first one of you tries to unionize I swear I'll send you back to the salt mine".[38] In 2020, an NLRB judge ruled that Domenech had threatened staff illegally and required the company to post notices in its offices and email employees to inform them about their legal rights.[39] Domenech argued unsuccessfully that the tweet was a joke.[39] The New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonprofit dedicated to fighting what it says is an excessive administrative state, and which had been representing The Federalist pro bono, announced that they would appeal. Reason and National Review published articles questioning the judge's decision.[40][41] In November 2020 a NLRB panel endorsed the ruling and additionally ordered the company to instruct Domenech to delete the tweet.[42] A U.S. court of appeals found the NLRB's action "unlawful", and vacated the NLRB's orders because the tweet was not an unlawful labor practice and because the tweet was protected first amendment speech.[43][44]


Google Ads​

In June 2020, Google Ads warned The Federalist that it was considering demonetizing the website because of racism in its comment section; The Federalist removed the comment section entirely, and Google announced that "no action will be taken".[45][46][47] In response, Domenech said: "We are really learning the degree to which Big Tech can be weaponized by woke mobs, or woke journalists in this case, to try to shut down places who disagree with their leftist agenda."[48] Tech journalist Mike Masnick called these accusations baseless, pointing out that many different websites were routinely receiving such notices from Google (quoting nine recent examples from his own news site, Techdirt): "It's not anti-conservative bias, but just yet another example of how difficult it is to do any form of content moderation at scale".[49]


Falsehoods during the 2020 election​

While ballots were being counted in the 2020 election, The Federalist made false claims of large-scale fraud.[8][9] One of The Federalist's tweets said, "Yes, Democrats Are Trying To Steal The Election In Michigan, Wisconsin, And Pennsylvania."[8] The website falsely insinuated that fraud was occurring in Michigan.[50] Other news outlets quickly showed that the purported fraud was a clerical error that was quickly corrected; The Federalist did not delete the story, which had gone viral.[51] Co-founder Sean Davis shared the misleading story, leading Twitter to tag his post as containing disputed information.[52]

Republican congressman Cliff Bentz of Oregon referenced Federalist articles as the source of his allegation during a town hall in La Grande that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg "bought" the 2020 election for Joe Biden by financing a 503c non-profit to expand poll worker training and security.[53]
 
  • Like
Reactions: bojihawk44
Social media is the problem. Throwing money at it will not do a damn bit of good.

24/7/365 of a phone isn’t going to be leveled off with an encounter group or 60 minutes of therapy each week.

Throwing taxes at shit might make some feel better but at the end of the day the phone is still rotting the brain.
 
Social media is the problem. Throwing money at it will not do a damn bit of good.

24/7/365 of a phone isn’t going to be leveled off with an encounter group or 60 minutes of therapy each week.

Throwing taxes at shit might make some feel better but at the end of the day the phone is still rotting the brain.
I would very possibly support a dictatorial regime forcing us to go back to 2006 technology. GPS in cars for not getting lost. Cell phones that had the shittiest imaginable cameras and no apps more addictive than Snake. All internet has to be accessed indoors at home or like at places like a public library or cafe or place of business or school and nowhere else.
 
Why is it the government’s job to teach children social & emotional skills? Just going out on a limb here, but I could have sworn someone else owned that responsibility.
Why is it the government’s job to teach the interpretation of literature? Ancient civ? Art? Let’s just get government out of the “helping citizens to lead fuller, more meaningful lives” business altogether.

Bottom line or GTFO.
 
SEL is one of the hot button issues in schools, along with CRT.

When did SEL start? Genuinely don’t know the history of it’s widespread use.

I talked to my sophomore about this a-lot during a pretty heated school board race this past fall.

In practice at her school- it’s a wasted hour every two weeks or something. The teachers and students get nothing out it- in her opinion.

Maybe her school just doesn’t GAF, but I dunno.
 
I would very possibly support a dictatorial regime forcing us to go back to 2006 technology. GPS in cars for not getting lost. Cell phones that had the shittiest imaginable cameras and no apps more addictive than Snake. All internet has to be accessed indoors at home or like at places like a public library or cafe or place of business or school and nowhere else.
China limits much of the internet after a certain time.

It will never happen here. Those that can’t handle the mental part of the internet are likely just doomed. Like drug and alcohol abusers.
 
SEL is one of the hot button issues in schools, along with CRT.

When did SEL start? Genuinely don’t know the history of it’s widespread use.
Oh for cripes sake, the CRT stuff apparently isn't working any more so they're flopping around looking for other nonsense to stir up the rubes.

This is your 2023 Republican party, all nonsense all the time. "CRT" as a "hot button" issue in the schools. LOL.
 
Oh for cripes sake, the CRT stuff apparently isn't working any more so they're flopping around looking for other nonsense to stir up the rubes.

This is your 2023 Republican party, all nonsense all the time. "CRT" as a "hot button" issue in the schools. LOL.
I didn’t say I thought it was- just to clarify- but I know SEL and CRT were talked about a ton here last fall. I think it’s “moms for liberty” or something. I talked to a few of them- and it’s similar to any extremism.

I am genuinely curious about SEL- like the history or whatever, and other people with kids, how their districts handle it (or don’t)
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT