ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa bill would forbid discipline for school staff for using incorrect pronouns, names

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,934
113
School employees in Iowa would be protected from discipline if they use a student or staffer's incorrect personal pronouns or name, a bill under consideration by state lawmakers says.

The legislation, House File 2139, prevents any disciplinary action — ranging from written or verbal reprimands to termination — for incorrect use of pronouns or "legal names," a proposal that will most directly impact transgender students and staff. It would apply to "employees, contractors or students."

Advocates of the bill expressed concern that they could be fired for "making an honest mistake" and that school policies on pronouns and preferred names would steer away "teachers of faith." Opponents argued that the legislation was intended to protect intentional use of incorrect pronouns or names, and it directly contradicts a law passed by the Republican-led Legislature last year.


Religious advocacy groups such as The Family Leader and the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition are backing the bill, touting it as key to retaining religious staff in schools.

"It just makes sense," said Ryan Benn, policy director for The Family Leader. "It protects teachers of the faith."

But those testifying against the bill, which included multiple transgender students, said it effectively allowed bullying and harassment against trans and nonbinary members of school districts.


Matthew McIver, the father of a transgender middle-schooler from Des Moines, said the language of the bill laid out a "hostile work environment in basically any other context," and "strips parents of their rights."

And a lobbyist for the Iowa State Education Association called it "a solution in search of a problem."

"We are not aware of any school district that is currently punishing an education professional or a student for using the wrong pronouns," said Melissa Peterson, the union's legislative and policy director.

 
School employees in Iowa would be protected from discipline if they use a student or staffer's incorrect personal pronouns or name, a bill under consideration by state lawmakers says.

The legislation, House File 2139, prevents any disciplinary action — ranging from written or verbal reprimands to termination — for incorrect use of pronouns or "legal names," a proposal that will most directly impact transgender students and staff. It would apply to "employees, contractors or students."

Advocates of the bill expressed concern that they could be fired for "making an honest mistake" and that school policies on pronouns and preferred names would steer away "teachers of faith." Opponents argued that the legislation was intended to protect intentional use of incorrect pronouns or names, and it directly contradicts a law passed by the Republican-led Legislature last year.


Religious advocacy groups such as The Family Leader and the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition are backing the bill, touting it as key to retaining religious staff in schools.

"It just makes sense," said Ryan Benn, policy director for The Family Leader. "It protects teachers of the faith."

But those testifying against the bill, which included multiple transgender students, said it effectively allowed bullying and harassment against trans and nonbinary members of school districts.


Matthew McIver, the father of a transgender middle-schooler from Des Moines, said the language of the bill laid out a "hostile work environment in basically any other context," and "strips parents of their rights."

And a lobbyist for the Iowa State Education Association called it "a solution in search of a problem."

"We are not aware of any school district that is currently punishing an education professional or a student for using the wrong pronouns," said Melissa Peterson, the union's legislative and policy director.

This isn't about honest mistakes, this is about enabling someone to purposely choose to harass others by intentionally ignoring the person's wishes.
 
Besides, it's pretty easy to call a "girl" with a growth and a bulge Fred instead of Fredrika, don't you think?! Thanks for posting this.
 
Punishing ignoring a person's wishes - kind of sadistic in it's own right
If your employer asks you to call a co worker or client a certain name and you purposely ignore their request they should have the right to punish you just like they could for any other directive you purposely choose to ignore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkbirch
The Ioway repubber agenda never ceases to amaze me. Taking on what matters! The brain drain is complete.

caddyshack-judge.gif
 
Nobody should ever wonder why trans kids commit suicide at twice the rate of other kids in Iowa. This would codify the right to bully and dehumanize kids.

What percentage of Iowans are trans?

Just curious. I don't understand why it's such a huge issue for Democrats.
 
School employees in Iowa would be protected from discipline if they use a student or staffer's incorrect personal pronouns or name, a bill under consideration by state lawmakers says.

The legislation, House File 2139, prevents any disciplinary action — ranging from written or verbal reprimands to termination — for incorrect use of pronouns or "legal names," a proposal that will most directly impact transgender students and staff. It would apply to "employees, contractors or students."

Advocates of the bill expressed concern that they could be fired for "making an honest mistake" and that school policies on pronouns and preferred names would steer away "teachers of faith." Opponents argued that the legislation was intended to protect intentional use of incorrect pronouns or names, and it directly contradicts a law passed by the Republican-led Legislature last year.


Religious advocacy groups such as The Family Leader and the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition are backing the bill, touting it as key to retaining religious staff in schools.

"It just makes sense," said Ryan Benn, policy director for The Family Leader. "It protects teachers of the faith."

But those testifying against the bill, which included multiple transgender students, said it effectively allowed bullying and harassment against trans and nonbinary members of school districts.


Matthew McIver, the father of a transgender middle-schooler from Des Moines, said the language of the bill laid out a "hostile work environment in basically any other context," and "strips parents of their rights."

And a lobbyist for the Iowa State Education Association called it "a solution in search of a problem."

"We are not aware of any school district that is currently punishing an education professional or a student for using the wrong pronouns," said Melissa Peterson, the union's legislative and policy director.

Again, this fixes our dirty waterways how?
 
What percentage of Iowans are trans?

Just curious. I don't understand why it's such a huge issue for Democrats.
It's very small. Why is it such a big deal for some people to bully and dehumanize them?
Oh, right, bigotry and it activates bigot voters and low information voters.
Either we all have rights, or nobody has them.
 
It's very small. Why is it such a big deal for some people to bully and dehumanize them?
Oh, right, bigotry and it activates bigot voters and low information voters.
Either we all have rights, or nobody has them.

It's odd to me why 0.29% of the population is such a huge cultural issue on both sides.

Surely, there are more pressing issues.
 
What percentage of Iowans are trans?

Just curious. I don't understand why it's such a huge issue for Democrats.
Democrats aren’t the ones forcing the issue - Iowa republicans are here.

I won’t begin to understand how one decides which pronouns to be address by - I typically address people by their name so it’s never really come up for me personally. But if coworker X asks me to address them by preferred name, how to pronounce it correctly, etc; whether they trans or not - basic decency suggests I agree to their request. It doesn’t cost me a thing. Me willfully ignoring that request makes me an asshole at best.
 
School employees in Iowa would be protected from discipline if they use a student or staffer's incorrect personal pronouns or name, a bill under consideration by state lawmakers says.

The legislation, House File 2139, prevents any disciplinary action — ranging from written or verbal reprimands to termination — for incorrect use of pronouns or "legal names," a proposal that will most directly impact transgender students and staff. It would apply to "employees, contractors or students."

Advocates of the bill expressed concern that they could be fired for "making an honest mistake" and that school policies on pronouns and preferred names would steer away "teachers of faith." Opponents argued that the legislation was intended to protect intentional use of incorrect pronouns or names, and it directly contradicts a law passed by the Republican-led Legislature last year.


Religious advocacy groups such as The Family Leader and the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition are backing the bill, touting it as key to retaining religious staff in schools.

"It just makes sense," said Ryan Benn, policy director for The Family Leader. "It protects teachers of the faith."

But those testifying against the bill, which included multiple transgender students, said it effectively allowed bullying and harassment against trans and nonbinary members of school districts.


Matthew McIver, the father of a transgender middle-schooler from Des Moines, said the language of the bill laid out a "hostile work environment in basically any other context," and "strips parents of their rights."

And a lobbyist for the Iowa State Education Association called it "a solution in search of a problem."

"We are not aware of any school district that is currently punishing an education professional or a student for using the wrong pronouns," said Melissa Peterson, the union's legislative and policy director.

We have some seriously dumb elected officials. There is an elected official in California trying to raise the minimum wage to $50 an hour, also. Smh….. just zero logic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher
All you need to know about this legislation is that the Family Leader is pushing it forward, led by one of the most despicable, subhuman POS to ever live within our state's borders. Here's the shit eating weasel himself, Bob Vander Plaats, the Dutch Reformist version of Fred Phelps/Westboro Baptist. Phuck this guy:

640px-Mike_Huckabee_and_Bob_Vander_Plaats_November_2010_%28cropped%29.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
All you need to know about this legislation is that the Family Leader is pushing it forward, led by one of the most despicable, subhuman POS to ever live within our state's borders. Here's the shit eating weasel himself, Bob Vander Plaats, the Dutch Reformist version of Fred Phelps/Westboro Baptist. Phuck this guy:

640px-Mike_Huckabee_and_Bob_Vander_Plaats_November_2010_%28cropped%29.jpg
I support Bob and House File 2139. It's idiotic to be subjected to some type of disciplinary action for calling someone with a full beard wearing a dress a man. Any educator who would look at a man in a dress and call them a woman shouldn't be trusted to teach students as they clearly don't have the brains.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT