Was helping a friend research this. Thought perhaps someone would have knowledge here. (realize this is moreso an ask an attorney question)
1. Elderly person went to nursing home, exhausted assets.
2. Caretaker (child of said elderly person) lived with elderly in elderly person's house for years, taking care of them.
3. Caretaker, per their understanding -- through a caretaker exemption that would disallow the house to be used by state to cover expenses -- should be able to continue to live in house without state trying to recover costs.
(document https://hhs.iowa.gov/media/581/download?inline=#:~:text=Unlike many neighboring states, Iowa,secure a medical assistance debt.)
4. Lien is now placed on home, document linked above states that liens are not placed on homes to recover medical expenses. (per 2023)
1. Elderly person went to nursing home, exhausted assets.
2. Caretaker (child of said elderly person) lived with elderly in elderly person's house for years, taking care of them.
3. Caretaker, per their understanding -- through a caretaker exemption that would disallow the house to be used by state to cover expenses -- should be able to continue to live in house without state trying to recover costs.
(document https://hhs.iowa.gov/media/581/download?inline=#:~:text=Unlike many neighboring states, Iowa,secure a medical assistance debt.)
4. Lien is now placed on home, document linked above states that liens are not placed on homes to recover medical expenses. (per 2023)
Last edited: