ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa lands former Villanova PG Lucy Olsen

This isn't true at all. Kylie was the second best defensive player on the team last year and will be our best defender this coming year.
Yeah she’s a good defender. Needs to bring something offensively though. When Gabby couldn’t hit a 3, regardless of how good her defense was, it wasn’t making up for her shooting woes.
 
Great addition. How good are the incoming freshmen guards to play point?

Guyton is going to be a great PG. I don't think she's likely to see the floor next year tho. I think a red shirt is likely. She'll miss too much of the summer to learn the system. Bluder's system is unique. It'll be hard to jump in in December. Stremlow will be a good reserve PG. We need good role players and she can be that. Levin I'm not sure will really ever be an impact player for Iowa.

Hell of a get. Wow. That said...how bout some inside size to complement the great guard play?

We have a very agile 6'4 Center coming in from Oregon who is ready to get physical on the block and run the floor. She is the 4th best C in her class according to ESPN. She is the type of player Bluder has been waiting for. She should thrive in Bluder's sytem and I suspect Bluder plans to run as much offenese through her as she can handle, as quickly as possible. She may not start in November but unless O'Grady explodes, I'll be shocked if Heiden doesn't jump her by January.

Add Lucy to returning starters Sydney and Hannah...who are the other 2 starters?

Olsen, Feuerbach, Affolter, Stueke, O'Grady. Expect minutes from McCabe (2), Mallegni (2/3), Gyamfi (3/4), Heiden (5). I think those are gonna be the 9 we roll with. There's a chance Stremlow plays from reserve minutes at the 1 but I won't hold my breath.

Maybe we should just dump the men’s program altogether and focus resources on the women’s team. Lisa Bluder might possibly make Iowa a women’s basketball powerhouse if this continues.

Honestly this is exactly what Iowa should do. Bluder is shooting for a Top 5 class in 2025 and 2026, if not Top 3. She has 3 very warm targets in each class. 2 of each in the Top 25, 1 of each in the Top 15. She's competing with LSU, UConn, Notre Dame, Texas, UCLA (to name a few) for these kids. Again we have already signed Addie Deal, the #12/#5 kid in the class of 2025. This is an opportunity -- and one with outsize ROI, IMO (less $$ needed when compared to FB/MBB).

I watched Fuerbach tip a number of passes during the big ten and NCAA tourneys which turned into big turnovers. She hit some big shots. She is fast an agressive. She can go get rebounds

I think she needs to improver her dribbling. She sometimes drives to the hoop, likes to drive the baseline, but then cannot reverse herself out of a jam. She could be a slasher to the rim to go along with some good arc shooting. I think she will play 15 to 25 minutes a game to start the next season.

Feuerbach is lightning quick and very scrappy. But you're right, she needs to work on the her handles and she needs to learn how to slow down. And she needs to work on her passing (handles again). She also needs to work on her shooting lol. I think the shooting is the easy part though. Bluder and Raina can get her to 33%.

I believe Feuerbach will start also, at least to start the season. She and Affolter will likely be expected to be the senior team leaders in the first season post-Clark.

I think I agree. Bluder trusts her. And she believes in her. She has gotten minutes since day 1 as a Hawkeye and she stayed in the rotation all year, through the NC game. Bluder repeateadly gave her the green light to shoot even when she was cold for game after game. She needs more minutes. She needs to hunt for her shot. It's easy to forget she missed a whole season.

I will say though -- as Devil's advocate in defense of McCabe -- that the last two summers, there was a WBB meet-and-greet. At each one, players were asked which teammate had taken the biggest leap in the off-season. In 2022, Affolter was the most popular answer. She got into the lineup in 2022-2023 but didn't breakout til 2023-2024. In 2023, McCabe was the overwhelming answer (I believe it was unanimous actually). In 2023-2024 she, like Affolter before her, also worked her way into the rotation. Hopefiully she continues in Affolter's footsteps for 2024-2025.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Guyton is going to be a great PG. I don't think she's likely to see the floor next year. I think a red shirt is likely. She'll miss too much of the summer to learn the system. Bluder's system is unique. It'll be hard to jump in in December. Stremlow will be a good reserve PG. We need good role players and she can be that. Levin I'm not sure will really ever be an impact player for Iowa.

We have a very agile 6'4 Center coming in from Oregon who is ready to get physical on the block and run the floor. She is the 4th best C in her class according to ESPN. She is the type of player Bluder has been waiting for. She should thrive in Bluder's sytem and I suspect Bluder plans to run as much offenese through her as she can handle, as quickly as possible. She may not start in November but unless O'Grady explodes, I'll be shocked if Heiden doesn't jump her by January.

Olsen, Feuerbach, Affolter, Stueke, O'Grady. Expect major minutes from McCabe (2), Mallegni (2/3), Gyamfi (3/4), Heiden (5). I think those are gonna be the 9 we roll with barring a huge surprise from Edigar or Stremlow.

Honestly this is exactly what Iowa should do. Bluder is shooting for a Top 5 class in 2025 and 2026, if not Top 3. She has 3 very warm targets in each class. 2 of each in the Top 25, 1 in the Top 15 of each. Again we have already signed Addie Deal, the #12/#5 kid in the class of 2025.

Feuerbach is lightning quick but you're right, she needs to work on the her handles and she needs to learn how to slow down. And she needs to work on her passing (handles again). She also needs to work on her shooting lol.

I think I agree. Bluder trusts her. She has gotten minutes since day 1 as a Hawkeye and she stayed in the rotation all year, through the NC game. She needs more minutes. She needs to hunt for her shot. Bluder repeateadly gave her the green light to shoot even when she was cold for game after game.

I will say though, that the last two summers, there was a WBB meet-and-greet. At each one, players were asked which teammate had taken the biggest leap in the off-season. In 2022, Affolter was the most popular answer. She got into the lineup in 2022-2023 but didn't breakout til 2023-2024. In 2023, McCabe was the overwhelming answer (I believe it was unanimous actually). In 2023-2024 she, like Affolter before her, also worked her way into the rotation. Hopefiully she continues in Affolter's footsteps.

how good can this team realistically be next season? what a crazy, fun, 2 years it's been....
 
office space i would set the place on fire too if i didnt get my cake GIF by Maudit
 
how good can this team realistically be next season? what a crazy, fun, 2 years it's been....
I think they can certainly compete to host the first two rounds + be a contender for a Sweet 16. Round of 32 is a very realistic expectation. I think they can also beat Iowa State, KU, TN and VA Tech in their early season games.

Nothing is guaranteed -- they certainly will have some bumps in the road. But the potential is there. Hannah, Sydney, Kylie all have to want it and have to work for it. They need to step into their roles, be ready to make big plays. They're upperclassmen, they should be ready for the challenge. The reality though is all of these kids now have to make a major adjustment -- they've only ever played behind and around a star player. Everything ran through her. Now they have to step out and be impact players themselves.

O'Grady, McCabe and Gyamfi need to improve as well as role players. This could be a deep team and a pretty successful season if everyone puts in the work and the chemistry comes along. We're lucky that everyone but Lucy knows the system and their role in it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not counting out any of the freshmen until the summer sorts it out. Never truly know what you have until they are on the floor with the rest of the team.

*Stuelke needs to get a short jumper into her game. It would be a pretty big thing for this team to have that shot from high post.
 
They have her listed at 5'9" but man she is either a tall 5'9" or most of the teams in her highlights were small as f***.

Takes a little more worry away that I have about Maddyn Greenway who is a lean 5'8" with still a little more room to grow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkod
As a MBB 'first' fan, I am so fugging jealous of how the WBB program has been going & trending for the past 2.5-3+ years.





(thanks Fran)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ObeseMuffins
my only drawback on feurbach is about once or twice a game, she gets the ball wide open at the free throw line and looks desperate to find someone to pass to. Completely ignored an open shot at the basket.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HAWK
Yeah she’s a good defender. Needs to bring something offensively though. When Gabby couldn’t hit a 3, regardless of how good her defense was, it wasn’t making up for her shooting woes.
I disagree. I think Gabbie's defense has been a major part of our success the last two years.

As for her offensive performance, Gabbie created space on the floor, just by being there. Teams had to respect her shooting because when she was on she was deadly. This is the only concern that I have wrt Kylie. If teams sag off Kylie and they don't respect her perimeter game, and she can't knock down threes to make them pay, then I think we will see more Taylor.

In a perfect world, Kylie will get more under control and Taylor will improve her ball handling and the game will slow down for both of them. Both of them are going to get a lot more minutes next year and I expect both to improve a lot between now and next march.

Personally, I think the absolute biggest thing that needs to happen between now and next year is Hannah needs to develop a consistent outside shot. I've been told she is making great strides in that department and expect we will see her become more of an outside threat next year. We need that if we're going to play her at the four which is where I think she belongs.
 
As a MBB 'first' fan, I am so fugging jealous of how the WBB program has been going & trending for the past 2.5-3+ years.





(thanks Fran)
Final Women's Coaches Polls last 6 yrs: Iowa Hawkeyes Final Rank and NCAA Tourney

2024- #2 Championship Game
2023- #2 Championship Game
2022- #14 Second Round
2021- #19 Sweet 16
2020- #23 Covid No Tourney
2019- #8 Elite 8
 
Final Women's Coaches Polls last 6 yrs: Iowa Hawkeyes Final Rank and NCAA Tourney

2024- #2 Championship Game
2023- #2 Championship Game
2022- #14 Second Round
2021- #19 Sweet 16
2020- #23 Covid No Tourney
2019- #8 Elite 8
I can't believe we were ranked so low to end 2020!! We beat Indiana, Maryland and Ohio State (others too but those were the flashiest ones and those programs still have the same cachet) that year and went undefeated at home. We would have been at least a 4 seed had the tourney happened.
 
Probably right. I just saw how much of a liability gabby was this season when she couldn’t hit anything during the regular season, which is exactly what we’ll get from feurbach imo. Maybe she’ll take major strides offensively, or with Clark being gone may make a difference as well. Mccabe shot 46% from 3 this year on a pretty decent amount of shots, just don’t think you can keep that production off the floor. And it’s not exactly like she’s jordan bohannon out there trying to defend, she’s competent on that end of the floor as well.


I think this all starts and stops with what you thought of Gabby🤷‍♂️ and honestly if it’s even questionable to you, a more inexperienced “gunner” was going to be capable of making plays on both ends of the court? In those environments, WTH?

25 ft bombs….✔️

Big shots, catches, passes, blocks, lockdowns…

No…and not a crime, shes very young. She’ll get her chance.

Just a guess, but I’d wager analytics and casual scouts, would consider Feurbach to still have more + metrics & upside.

But again, just my opinion 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_salmfilsntd0b
Final Women's Coaches Polls last 6 yrs: Iowa Hawkeyes Final Rank and NCAA Tourney

2024- #2 Championship Game
2023- #2 Championship Game
2022- #14 Second Round
2021- #19 Sweet 16
2020- #23 Covid No Tourney
2019- #8 Elite 8
Oy vey.

The men haven't seen success like that in decades, let alone 5 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: intrepodor
What's the story on Jada? Has she been injured or just not good enough to play?
Yes, she was our with an ankle injury for basically all summer before her freshman year. Missed way too much to get caught up (it's why I'm so doubtful Guyton will be able to). Then her sophomore year she just got buried in the depth chart. She can play the 3/4 but Kate, Sydney, Hannah, Kylie and Gabbie got all the minutes at those positions this year.

There is an ex-Iowa football player on Reddit who claims to be well-connected with the athletics department and he said he has heard Bluder and staff are very high on Jada for next year. Which makes sense -- she can shoot the ball and she has size. She made a very impressive transition 3 in one of the European games.
 

I like her shot. Imo, she shoots a "true jumpshot." She jumps first then makes her stroke, thus seems to get a little "hang time" a la PB on her mid-rangers.

The scissored legs don't bother me either ... until I see her miss one and I'll be muttering "she's so off balance." 😉
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tunadog
I really like Lucy Olson's style of play. She is relentless and has a terrific motor. She just goes and goes. Against good competition. Whether against Marquette or UConn, she is fearless.


I really think Lucy will lead Iowa to a lot of wins & just when @EvilMonkeyInTheCloset thinks he finally has that national championship within reach....

giphy-downsized.gif
 
Well UConn seems to be able to have both a great men's and women's teams
Have you ever heard that is where ESPN is located and they do have a few million dollars to help out the sports departments at Conn.!!!
 
Have you ever heard that is where ESPN is located and they do have a few million dollars to help out the sports departments at Conn.!!!
Do you have proof to share that ESPN donates millions to UConn Athletics Dept. I would think that would be a huge conflict of interest for a sports network that can televise their games could donate to the school.

The reason I say that is announcers like Kirk Herbstreit when he is on ESPN cannot even say who he thinks will be the winner of a game he is going to be working on. Kirk cant do that yet ESPN can donate millions to one athletic dept. I dont believe it unless I see evidence. I did a google search about espn donating to Uconn athletics and found nothing.
 
Takes a little more worry away that I have about Maddyn Greenway who is a lean 5'8" with still a little more room to grow.

Lean is not a word I would use to describe Maddyn....she is a big girl. Probably kick all of our asses in a fight.


(Big girl is not a negative in any way....she looks like a bad ass linebacker for some reason....a linebacker with the ball in her hands. I think in the NFL they call players like that Tight Ends)
 
You better tell Welker that you decided that her win didn't win it all.
Pretty sneaky! Should be interesting to see how that program develops

re: Greenway. Not tall but plays fearless and her athleticism really stands out. I expect Bluder to hand her the ball day one if/when she arrives at Iowa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_salmfilsntd0b
PG Olsen
SG McCabe
SF Affolter
PF Stuelke
C Heiden

Hope I'm wrong but I think AOG could take a step back without having an elite passer creating so many opportunities for her. Just an optimistic guess that Ava will bring a better overall skill set. And with Olsen's ability to penetrate with the dribble and dish to the perimeter, I could see Taylor going nuts from three point range and when she gets hot she doesn't seem to miss.
I think AOG had more problems with CC22 on the floor than she did when CC22 was out (which wasn't often). She seemed more comfortable catching the ball on entry feeds than when CC22 was rifling passes to her, or expecting AOG to be places AOG hadn't thought about. Also there will be less pressure on AOG in the low post, especially if she is playing along side Hannah.
 
Addie likely at post starting the season if they do really want Hannah at the 4, Will be interesting to see how fast Ava Heiden progresses, Guessing it comes down to Taylor and Kylie for the other spot.
I read that Heiden was heading to Iowa a day afyer her graduation. She'll have time to adapt to Iowa City and her teammates. Plus daily workouts and training.
 
Lean is not a word I would use to describe Maddyn....she is a big girl. Probably kick all of our asses in a fight.


(Big girl is not a negative in any way....she looks like a bad ass linebacker for some reason....a linebacker with the ball in her hands. I think in the NFL they call players like that Tight Ends)
Fine. Long. How's that?
 
I think this all starts and stops with what you thought of Gabby🤷‍♂️ and honestly if it’s even questionable to you, a more inexperienced “gunner” was going to be capable of making plays on both ends of the court? In those environments, WTH?

25 ft bombs….✔️

Big shots, catches, passes, blocks, lockdowns…

No…and not a crime, shes very young. She’ll get her chance.

Just a guess, but I’d wager analytics and casual scouts, would consider Feurbach to still have more + metrics & upside.

But again, just my opinion 🤷‍♂️
Way to make a whole bunch of shit up in your first paragraph, well done.
My whole premise has been
Taylor McCabes offense/3pt shooting+defense > kylie feurbachs offense+defense
And that’s because kylies offensive game is nearly nonexistent while taylor is actually a competent defender.
Gabby was a huge reason for our push to the championship game because she was actually making her 3’s. You think if she was out there missing shots like she did most of the regular season she would’ve been an asset strictly because of her D? I do not. And I think that’s what we get from kylie without improvement from her offensive game.
 
I watched Fuerbach tip a number of passes during the big ten and NCAA tourneys which turned into big turnovers. She hit some big shots. She is fast an agressive. She can go get rebounds

I think she needs to improver her dribbling. She sometimes drives to the hoop, likes to drive the baseline, but then cannot reverse herself out of a jam. She could be a slasher to the rim to go along with some good arc shooting. I think she will play 15 to 25 minutes a game to start the next season.
Needs to get stronger with the ball. She also needs to reduce driving into double coverage which resulted in many of her turnovers. I really like her length and athletism.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT