Originally posted by crankermo:
Hawks,
I'm well aware of the top notch kids in Iowa. My question is why didn't Chelsea Thomas end up at Iowa? That can't be blamed on the current staff. The only reason MU got her was because of a tape. As for Paige Lowary I'm sure the current staff was behind the 8 ball when it came to her recruitment. In your opinion why aren't the top Iowa kids going to Iowa? MO kids are leaving MO at an alarming rate also. The girls that stay in MO are getting little to no money to play @MU. We have kids going to a lot of bigtime programs and honestly MU could care less. So I understand the frustration with Iowa kids going elsewhere.
What can be done differently to keep Iowa girls home? I will be honest and say that I wasn't aware of Iowa's past success until we toured the facilities and read the rock at the field. It's very impressive and you combine that with everything the University has and Iowa will regain their spot in softball.
Simple. Massive financial committment to the program which would include a completely new competition stadium with indoor training capabilities. Basically see what has been done at Indiana and that needs to be duplicated at Iowa.
Hey, scholarship money and how it is effectively distributed amongst the roster in an equivalency sport is always going to be an issue for any coach. The math simply does not work out for long term success if you are not able to field a team with a core base of in-state players willing to take a little less. How do you get those in-state players to stay at home for maybe a little less money? Facilities and winning. When the original stadium that is now Pearl Field was built back in the early 1990s, it was probably the top facility outside of the then Pac10. As with most facilities at Iowa, they do not keep up with the Jones and become obsolete almost as soon as they are completed. Add in the fact that the facility has been completely destroyed by two significant floods within the last 20 years and it does not bode well for your ability to sell a major facility advantage to recruits. In addition, programs like Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa State, Wisconsin, Mizzou have all within the last 10 years made a significant committment to playing top-25 softball. Both in facilities upgrades, coaching salaries and recruiting. Iowa did not make that same committment.
Gayle Blevins was able to overcome many of these obsticles simply based on the close to 30 year relationships she had with the Iowa High School softball community. She was able to get the vast majority of teir 1 players in the state to build the core of her roster. She would not get 100%, but definitely the majority. She then worked the connections she had on the west coast and was able to land alot of California girls who either got lost in the scholarship shuffle at UCLA, Stanford or any of the other U-Cal or Cal State schools, or the ones who simply had a desire to get away from home for college. That formula won alot of games for Gayle along with some B1G Championships and College World Series Finals appearances. It also didn't hurt that as recently as the late 1990s the B1G, the Pac10/12 and a few select schools in the ACC and Big8/Big12 were really the only schools that focused strongly on softball. Twenty years ago, SEC softball did not even exist. Now along with the Pac12 it is the dominant league.
Looper so far has either decided not to dominate the Iowa Prep ranks in recruiting or has not been able to win over the gate keepers in the coaching ranks. Regardless, a Marla Looper lead Iowa softball program is no longer considered a destination program for the elite high school talent int he state. That was not the case 10 years ago. If Marla does not find a way to do this, she will not be successfull long-term at Iowa in my opinion. The media guides in multiple equivalency scholarship sports at Iowa are littered with the names of former coaches who didn't make it very long becasue they thought they could succeed without recruiting the in-state kids. My fear is that Looper will find herself on that same list 4-5 years from now.