Iowa to win Big 10 According to Tom Dienhart

[HoustonHawkeye]

Of course, this conclusion is based on his http://btn.com/2016/07/23/dienhart-roll-through-70-questions-for-big-ten-football-media-days/ article. I added up the questions he has about all 14 teams and here is the results:

1st: Iowa...(only 2 questions concerning our team)
2nd: Tied: IN, IL, MD, MSU, MN, NW, PU, Rutg (4 questions)
10th: Tied: MI, Neb, OSU (5 questions)
13th: PSU (6 questions)
14th: WI (7 questions)

Tom has the least questions/concerns about Iowa, so he must think we are going to win the Big 10 outright. Poor Wisconsin, 7 questions!
​

 

[IowaHawkeyeFBnBB4Life]

Well so much for that...

 

[Hawk68]

WTF?

 

[HoustonHawkeye]

WTF?

Let me spell it out for you. Sorry I was not more direct for you! It is sarcasm to Dienhart. Notice which teams got the most "attention" (questions asked about their team) Yes, it was the blue bloods of the Big10, not Iowa. Let me know if I need to explain it in another language for you. I can do sign language on the side if needed.

 

[DarkThunder#61]

Tom has the least questions/concerns about Iowa, so he must think we are going to win the Big 10 outright.​

Good. So then let's not disappoint him.

 

[CO_hawk]

Since when does having the least amount of questions translate to him thinking Iowa will win the Big10?

 

[HoustonHawkeye]

Since when does having the least amount of questions translate to him thinking Iowa will win the Big10?

Let me try to explain this again. It was sarcasm!

 

[CO_hawk]

Let me try to explain this again. It was sarcasm!

6 replies, 2 times had to explain it was sarcasm = bad at sarcasm.

 

[IowaNiceHawk]

Good. So then let's not disappoint him.

I'm Down with what Dienhart is saying for this Fall.
Gimmee some of that

 

[HoustonHawkeye]

6 replies, 2 times had to explain it was sarcasm = bad at sarcasm.

I'm sad for you not understanding it was sarcasm after I said it was sarcasm. Maybe you need to just leave this thread and move on to another topic.

 

[CO_hawk]

I'm sad for you not understanding it was sarcasm after I said it was sarcasm. Maybe you need to just leave this thread and move on to another topic.

Oh look 8 replies, oops now 9.

 

[QChawks]

Time to look forward to 2017