ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa under-seeded again...

Are you talking about first or second half? Are you talking about Tennesse game or Rutgers game?

Haha geez we beat Michigan we should be a 2 seed.

Seeding is based on overall season. That late season collapse didn't help
 
In regards to next, I hope they are a 6,7 or 10 seed. I can't bear the thought of Iowa choking a 1st Rd game against a 15 or 14 seed.
 
Then TN and Cincinnati were over-seeded.

You can't have it both ways. Either Iowa is that good or they aren't. But for call or bounce here or there Iowa wins that game.


If Barnes and his team didn't fall asleep because they were 25 points ahead in the first half, Iowa gets beat by 30.

An under seeded team doesn't get completely outclassed like that for an entire half. Period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: K OKeefe
If Barnes and his team didn't fall asleep because they were 25 points ahead in the first half, Iowa gets beat by 30.

An under seeded team doesn't get completely outclassed like that for an entire half. Period.
So what happened in the 2nd half?
 
So if they had been the 8 or 9, they would have gotten Washington. That would have been a winnable game but no guarantee. If they beat them, they would have been rewarded with the honor of playing Carolina. That would have been Waaaay better than the Vols. If they had been the 7, they would have still gotten Tenn in the second round. There was no way in hell they we're getting anything higher than an 8. I would prefer the ten over the eight every time.
 
Anyone else confused why the committee put Minny & MSU in the Same place? Why not move a 8-9 down to 10 and move either Iowa or Minny up? They could of put Baylor in Des Moines and put Minny out West in the 8/9 game?

Just seems odd to have two conference opponents play in the second round. Any other conferences have that happen?
 
Anyone else confused why the committee put Minny & MSU in the Same place? Why not move a 8-9 down to 10 and move either Iowa or Minny up? They could of put Baylor in Des Moines and put Minny out West in the 8/9 game?

Just seems odd to have two conference opponents play in the second round. Any other conferences have that happen?

The committee took the whole keeping teams close to their geographic region way too literally after the Top 16 were placed. Minnesota could have been flipped with SH and Nevada with Cincinnati. They prefer not move teams up or down a seed if possible although they will do it out of necessity if they are out of options.
 
The committee took the whole keeping teams close to their geographic region way too literally after the Top 16 were placed. Minnesota could have been flipped with SH and Nevada with Cincinnati. They prefer not move teams up or down a seed if possible although they will do it out of necessity if they are out of options.

Just seemed fishy to me. I get it keeping teams close, but no way should a 7-10 Seed be playing an hour from their campus. I dont care, it’s the NCAA tournament for a reason. If they don’t like it, start doing like the women do it and let the higher seed host for Christ sakes.

I get keeping 1-4 seeds close to home that’s okay cause they earned it. But nothing outside of that, should of moved teams around to fit the mold and keep conference opponents from each other until sweet 16.
 
Just seemed fishy to me. I get it keeping teams close, but no way should a 7-10 Seed be playing an hour from their campus. I dont care, it’s the NCAA tournament for a reason. If they don’t like it, start doing like the women do it and let the higher seed host for Christ sakes.

I get keeping 1-4 seeds close to home that’s okay cause they earned it. But nothing outside of that, should of moved teams around to fit the mold and keep conference opponents from each other until sweet 16.

I agree. I mean, look at Va Tech and KSU. They were flung out to San Jose because those were the closest locations left but we can’t inconvenince the teams I mentioned who were 7 and 10 seeds respectively? It’s goofy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HaydenHawk8
They like to keep teams close but had no problem shipping Iowa out to Seattle or NewYork in prior tournaments.
 
No proof here but I think the committee likes drama. Example Duke /UCF.....Dawkins coached under Coach K. Iowa/Cincinnati ...Iowa learned Defense this summer at Cincinnati. Louisville/Minnesota.....Pitino/Son of past coach Rick Pitino. The list can go on and on! Thoughts???
 
No proof here but I think the committee likes drama. Example Duke /UCF.....Dawkins coached under Coach K. Iowa/Cincinnati ...Iowa learned Defense this summer at Cincinnati. Louisville/Minnesota.....Pitino/Son of past coach Rick Pitino. The list can go on and on! Thoughts???

For sure. The Iowa/Cincy thing is probably a reach but they definitely look for appealing matchups when they’re available to them.
 
No proof here but I think the committee likes drama. Example Duke /UCF.....Dawkins coached under Coach K. Iowa/Cincinnati ...Iowa learned Defense this summer at Cincinnati. Louisville/Minnesota.....Pitino/Son of past coach Rick Pitino. The list can go on and on! Thoughts???

there are so many storylines the committee doesnt need to make them happen.
 
Do you realize how many crappy teams lose close games? Does that make them under rated?

Iowa is no crappy team, but that 20 minutes of play in the 2nd half didn't make their season any where close to what TN did this year.


...they belong on the next level if TN is truly a 2-seed.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT