It’s not a moot point. Right now the math doesn’t add up or make any sense. You seem to be ok with that. Maybe that makes you a moron.Lol, moot
It’s not a moot point. Right now the math doesn’t add up or make any sense. You seem to be ok with that. Maybe that makes you a moron.Lol, moot
It's hilarious to see someone with no clue of how something works spew out nonsenseif there is a time that evidence shows that we are going to bring in more money than what is being spent, I am ok with that. Looking at at total of 60 Billion being sent there way and 5.7 billion being used this year to recoup 1 billion, I am not sure why that makes me a moron. It’s another issue of Government overspending.
It’s not a moot point. Right now the math doesn’t add up or make any sense. You seem to be ok with that. Maybe that makes you a moron.
So because you don’t want rich fvcks to have more money, you think it is smart for the Government to spend 60 billion and 5.7 billion in order to get back 1 billion? I would like to do some business with you. LolNo, a moron would let rich fvcks keep cheating on their taxes.... that seems like you
What makes you think tax cheats would pay a flat tax?By my calculations that $1B would fund Federal spending for less than 2 hours. Yawn. We should just go to a flat tax if we want to end cheating and loopholes. Politicians would have the most to lose under this scenario though.
Are you suggesting the IRS should be done away with completely? No, funding whatsoever? Because that's your argument here.It’s not a moot point. Right now the math doesn’t add up or make any sense. You seem to be ok with that. Maybe that makes you a moron.
How much does it cost to fund the IRS just to process taxes?So because you don’t want rich fvcks to have more money, you think it is smart for the Government to spend 60 billion and 5.7 billion in order to get back 1 billion? I would like to do some business with you. Lol
Yes it is…. Notice has been served. Pay your taxes you owe.The tax agency, boosted by $60 billion in additional funding from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act
Spent $60 billion to recover an additional $1 billion?
Financial genius!
Jeez Dude. What kind of take are you pushing?Should we spend $5.7 billion to recoup $1 billion?
That is an interesting take.
Absolutely I would. Treat all income the same and tax it the same percentage. Straightforward, transparent, simple and easy to audit.Would you support a flat tax that covered all income, earned and unearned. No matter what. No deductions. At all. For instance, no offsetting gains with losses. No offsetting personal income with capital losses. No depreciation deductions. No deductions from 1099 income. Social security taxed. Disability taxed. Charitable deductions taxed. Church income taxed.
Of course you don’t. I’m not sure anyone really does. If you don’t support limiting all those deductions, you don’t want a flat tax. You want a non progressive tax that favors no one except high earners.
Some are outright cheating but the bigger abuse is using loopholes and creative ways to try and avoid taxes and going over the line with our overly complex tax code. A simple flat tax on all income eliminates those issues and makes it a hell of a lot easier for the IRS to audit.What makes you think tax cheats would pay a flat tax?
The point here is that people are not paying the taxes they owe. That needs to be rectified.
I disagree. Using the tax code is allowed……just be ready to pay up (plus penalty) when ruled against…..Flat-taxes sound easy/fair…..they ain’t…not top the poor and middle classes….The IRS needs more employees top audit….rich and corporations pay their lawyers MILLIONS $$ in fees to save them money…..lets just play the audit game o n an even playing field. Strong enforcement of the IRS rules will even things out over time……..Folks “cheat” on their taxes because they can get by with it.Some are outright cheating but the bigger abuse is using loopholes and creative ways to try and avoid taxes and going over the line with our overly complex tax code. A simple flat tax on all income eliminates those issues and makes it a hell of a lot easier for the IRS to audit.
So should the FBI not prosecute a bank robbery if they can’t make a profit? If there is a rash of robberies in a certain area they shouldn’t spend more to increase enforcement unless they can make a profit?So because you don’t want rich fvcks to have more money, you think it is smart for the Government to spend 60 billion and 5.7 billion in order to get back 1 billion? I would like to do some business with you. Lol
So, just so we are clear. No more tax deductions on donations to churches? No more business deductions. You can’t incorporate to save on taxes.Absolutely I would. Treat all income the same and tax it the same percentage. Straightforward, transparent, simple and easy to audit.
It’s an interesting take that you guys have with this. Should we simply stop trying to collect just because it cost money?
Pretty much the way it's gone in California with allowing shoplifters up to 1000K before they even think about prosecuting...So should the FBI not prosecute a bank robbery if they can’t make a profit? If there is a rash of robberies in a certain area they shouldn’t spend more to increase enforcement unless they can make a profit?
Your hatred of all things government is showing through.
Wait - I can shoplift $1M and I am unlikely to be prosecuted?Pretty much the way it's gone in California with allowing shoplifters up to 1000K before they even think about prosecuting...
Can't discern an M from a K? Sounds about right for you...Wait - I can shoplift $1M and I am unlikely to be prosecuted?
SMFH
What do you think $1000K equates to?Can't discern an M from a K? Sounds about right for you...
You got it. Treat ALL income just like people, equal. So much simpler and transparent.So, just so we are clear. No more tax deductions on donations to churches? No more business deductions. You can’t incorporate to save on taxes.
Good luck with that! Businesses and wealthy will never tolerate that…and honestly, it doesn’t make good economic sense. Sounds good but another “there are not simple answers to complex questions”…You got it. Treat ALL income just like people, equal. So much simpler and transparent.
That simply won’t work. At all. Example. I have about 23k in 1099 income a year. Of that, 10k or so are fees I pay to perform the service. If I have to pay taxes on that it just wouldn’t work.You got it. Treat ALL income just like people, equal. So much simpler and transparent.
No, you are confused by the difference between revenue and net income. I’m not suggesting you pay taxes on revenue.That simply won’t work. At all. Example. I have about 23k in 1099 income a year. Of that, 10k or so are fees I pay to perform the service. If I have to pay taxes on that it just wouldn’t work.
But your suggestion is that all is treated as income/taxable…that was your “inference”…the current tax code is a hodge-podge of ways to attempt to separate revenue (deductions) from income…some how too much “income” gets converted to “wealth” without being taxed….(understand in America we tax “income” we do not tax “wealth”)…No, you are confused by the difference between revenue and net income. I’m not suggesting you pay taxes on revenue.
Surprisingly many of the uber rich are Democrats.The Radical Right wants less effort from the IRS for the obvious reasons.
Who gets targeted in these operations...the biggest violators/tax dodgers!
The reason wealthy CEOs support Trump isn't exactly a well kept secret.
I don’t think you understand what a flat tax is. A flat tax applies to all income. If I can deduct things from an income prior to the tax it isn’t a flat tax.No, you are confused by the difference between revenue and net income. I’m not suggesting you pay taxes on revenue.
There’s nothing inherently different between federal workers and private workers. Some of them owe taxes. Those taxes need to be collected. The problem would be if those federal workers were being treated differently. I don’t believe that’s the case.Surprisingly many of the uber rich are Democrats.
But I bet you know that.
If those taxes are owed then they should be pursued and collected. It’s the right thing.
Now - let’s move on to how many Federal workers owe tax money too. It’s shocking.
No disagreement but some work in the WH or are upper level types in DC.There’s nothing inherently different between federal workers and private workers. Some of them owe taxes. Those taxes need to be collected. The problem would be if those federal workers were being treated differently. I don’t believe that’s the case.
I get that. If they are using privilege to avoid they need to be bitch slapped. Otherwise they are just another taxpayer. I don’t think they should be treated any differently.No disagreement but some work in the WH or are upper level types in DC.
I think we’re agreeing!I get that. If they are using privilege to avoid they need to be bitch slapped. Otherwise they are just another taxpayer. I don’t think they should be treated any differently.
It is not unusual for folks to “owe” IRS $$ ut due to audits and unusual tax events many folks experience…Give the IRS equal opportunity to investigate potential tax fraud. Right now in most cases, the IRS is greatly outmanned in such investigations.No disagreement but some work in the WH or are upper level types in DC.