Is there a really smart, high IQ type conservative on this board?

[Raglefant]

Thanks for the advice. It definitely appears to be the case with that guy.

Da Raglefant is just a fraud.

You both talk about open eyes quite a bit. Recognize, nobody is laughing with you.

 

[HawktimusPrime]

You both talk about open eyes quite a bit. Recognize, nobody is laughing with you.

Trying the group is against you routine? That's as effective as scratching your back with your elbows.

 

[Raglefant]

Trying the group is against you routine? That's as effective as scratching your back with your elbows.

No, just trying to help you. You've apparently been around awhile, and I guess people stopped letting you know you're a loon. Deep down you must know, but it helps to hear it.

 

[HawktimusPrime]

No, just trying to help you. You've apparently been around awhile, and I guess people stopped letting you know you're a loon. Deep down you must know, but it helps to hear it.

Its rather enjoyable to hear. Why do you think that is?

 

[Raglefant]

Its rather enjoyable to hear. Why do you think that is?

I would hate to guess at the root cause of your issues. I recommend seeing a professional. Seriously.

 

[HawktimusPrime]

I would hate to guess at the root cause of your issues. I recommend seeing a professional. Seriously.

Professional what?

 

[Pepperman]

Raglefant's a doosh.

There, with three words I've offered proof of my intelligence.

 

[Raglefant]

Raglefant's a doosh.

There, with three words I've offered proof of my intelligence.

Prime, what was it you said about resorting to name-calling? Plus, intelligence requires knowing more than one thing.

 

[HawktimusPrime]

Prime, what was it you said about resorting to name-calling? Plus, intelligence requires knowing more than one thing.

You are no adversary at all. Why are you answering Pepper by talking to me? You will be allowed time when you develop into a more formidable being.

That is all.

 

[gusto79]

You can claim what you said is true. Its not statistically significant or substantive - but it is true. Lets get to the point - it's irrelevant if both sides have dumb voters. Of course they do. Over 100 million people vote in national elections. Only an imbecile would think this point in and of itself means something. What maters is which party is dependent on the dumb vote to win. That clearly is the Democratic party. Which leads any person with an IQ above 70 to logically come to the conclusion that the modern liberal agenda might not be so intelligent after all. Because if it was clearly such an intelligent platform the party wouldn't be dependent on dummies to win.

Bernie Goldberg talks about this liberal intelligence myth in one of his books. One example he used was john Kerry. When he ran for president the liberals trumpeted him as an east coast intellect - whereas George Bush was a southern dummy/hick. It came out later that George Bush actually had better grades than Kerry in college - and that definitely dispelled thr idea kerry was anything close to an intellectual.

What we experienced with John Kerry is the same nonsense you are spewing here.

What does any of this have to do with the OP? Seriously, 90% of the dumbest people in the country could be democrats and it still wouldn't have anything to do with the OP.

 

[Nat Algren]

Prime, what was it you said about resorting to name-calling? Plus, intelligence requires knowing more than one thing.

Didn't you just call someone a loon? My God, Man...get a mirror. On 2nd thought, if you look like I think you do, then don't.

 

[naturalmwa]

Didn't you just call someone a loon? My God, Man...get a mirror. On 2nd thought, if you look like I think you do, then don't.

That's my line.