ADVERTISEMENT

Is Trump a rapist?

The fact is no one but DT and that batshit crazy woman know the truth.
If you believe he is, it's bc you want to, and if you don't, we'll it's probably some of the same.
Neither of them have reputations warranting blind trust, that's for certain.
 
Evidently in NY it is not considered rape...

Aggravated Sexual Abuse vs Rape
As a digital penetration attorney in New York will explain, under the New York Penal Code, while aggravated sexual abuse and rape area both felony sex crimes that involve penetration, the two crimes have notable differences. Each of the 4 rape crimes requires sexual intercourse. The New York Penal Code gives “sexual intercourse” its “ordinary meaning” which is penetration, however slight, of a vagina by a penis. Digital penetration and penetration by an object are not included in the definition. Thus, where penetration is digital, the charge would not be rape, but aggravated sexual abuse.

 
As a digital penetration attorney....


Snl What GIF by reactionseditor
 
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape.
 
Evidently in NY it is not considered rape...

Aggravated Sexual Abuse vs Rape
As a digital penetration attorney in New York will explain, under the New York Penal Code, while aggravated sexual abuse and rape area both felony sex crimes that involve penetration, the two crimes have notable differences. Each of the 4 rape crimes requires sexual intercourse. The New York Penal Code gives “sexual intercourse” its “ordinary meaning” which is penetration, however slight, of a vagina by a penis. Digital penetration and penetration by an object are not included in the definition. Thus, where penetration is digital, the charge would not be rape, but aggravated sexual abuse.

This is messed up. So women are not capable of rape?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obviously Oblivious
I mean millions of votes are riding on if he raped someone or aggressively sexually abused someone.

Who am I kidding. It doesn’t matter. He could rape the corpse of some magas wife after shooting her on 5th Ave in broad daylight and he would still get their votes and somehow still skate on by avoiding trial until he is finally 6 feet under.
 
All these accusations aren't just coincidence.

It's a pattern of behavior.
 
The issue I have with calling him a rapist is this. You can have a well thought out post filled with accurate information and as soon as you call him a rapist at least a third of the board will derail the thread because he hasn’t been found guilty or liable of rape.

Now do I think he has raped women before? Absolutely.

This is no different than any gun related thread where people call an AR 15 an automatic rifle instead of a semiautomatic rifle. People take that point and go wild with that instead of the subject of the post.
 
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape.
Yes, everyone knows by now this ridiculously partisan judge redefined rape so all you parrots could put it in every post for eternity. Again, 2 people know for sure what happened, anything else is 100% politics driven ridiculousness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkedoff
Yes, everyone knows by now this ridiculously partisan judge redefined rape so all you parrots could put it in every post for eternity. Again, 2 people know for sure what happened, anything else is 100% politics driven ridiculousness.

So you really believe that if a man inserts his fingers in a woman’s vagina without her permission, she wasn’t raped?

Good luck with that argument.

 
The fact is no one but DT and that batshit crazy woman know the truth.
If you believe he is, it's bc you want to, and if you don't, we'll it's probably some of the same.
Neither of them have reputations warranting blind trust, that's for certain.
Well a judge and jury of his peers, in a court of justice, said he is a sexual abuser. Ill take their word for it after they heard and examined all evidence. Over the maga apologists on this board, who saw and heard nothing but Fox News clips. Justice has spoken. Trump is liable for sexual abuse.
 
Ugh it's not what I believe it's what the law had been forever. The jury said the same. These threads are pointless anyway, facts don't matter anymore to 90% of you.

This wasn’t a criminal case. So I will ask again - if a man did that to a woman, if she then says she was raped, would she be accurate or would she be inaccurate?
 
Well a judge and jury of his peers, in a court of justice, said he is a sexual abuser. Ill take their word for it after they heard and examined all evidence. Over the maga apologists on this board, who saw and heard nothing but Fox News clips. Justice has spoken. Trump is liable for sexual abuse.
A. It was a civil trial. You should learn the difference.
B. A jury of OJs peers said he was innocent so I suppose you believe he's innocent too and ran around defending him on that basis?
C. Let me guess, you're against the death penalty? Care to tell us why?
I don't know why people can't just be honest about what this all was. A he said she said CIVIL trial over an incident that supposedly happened 30 years ago, between a clearly mentally ill woman and DT who as we know is a pos human being... in an election cycle. It's all just stupid and deep down you now it but you're so politically obsessed you just don't care.
 
Yes, everyone knows by now this ridiculously partisan judge redefined rape so all you parrots could put it in every post for eternity. Again, 2 people know for sure what happened, anything else is 100% politics driven ridiculousness.
Thinks rape is impossible to prove.

Also believes 2020 election was stolen with zero evidence.
 
Thinks rape is impossible to prove.

Also believes 2020 election was stolen with zero evidence.
Thinks the word of a mentally ill woman of an incident 30 years ago put forth in a civil trial should brand someone a rapist no matter the circumstances.
Makes shit up about posters regarding thoughts in an election with zero evidence.
Political zombie.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT