Let's get down to the fine details here. Is digitally violating a woman's vagina in a non consensual and violent way rape?
Yes.Let's get down to the fine details here. Is digitally violating a woman's vagina in a non consensual and violent way rape?
This answer to this question is yes.Let's get down to the fine details here. Is digitally violating a woman's vagina in a non consensual and violent way rape?
This is messed up. So women are not capable of rape?Evidently in NY it is not considered rape...
Aggravated Sexual Abuse vs Rape
As a digital penetration attorney in New York will explain, under the New York Penal Code, while aggravated sexual abuse and rape area both felony sex crimes that involve penetration, the two crimes have notable differences. Each of the 4 rape crimes requires sexual intercourse. The New York Penal Code gives “sexual intercourse” its “ordinary meaning” which is penetration, however slight, of a vagina by a penis. Digital penetration and penetration by an object are not included in the definition. Thus, where penetration is digital, the charge would not be rape, but aggravated sexual abuse.
Digital Penetration | NY Criminal Defense Lawyer Stephen Bilkis & Associates
Free Consultation - Stephen Bilkis & Associates, PLLC - Free Consultation - Our New York criminal lawyers have a combined 100+ years of legal and law enforcement experience. Our team includes former prosecutors from the District Attorney’s offices in New York City and Long Island, as well as law...criminaldefense.1800nynylaw.com
So women are not capable of rape?
Fingers are too short.Let's get down to the fine details here. Is digitally violating a woman's vagina in a non consensual and violent way rape?
All these accusations aren't just coincidence. It's a pattern of behavior.
Let's get down to the fine details here. Is digitally violating a woman's vagina in a non consensual and violent way rape?
Yes, everyone knows by now this ridiculously partisan judge redefined rape so all you parrots could put it in every post for eternity. Again, 2 people know for sure what happened, anything else is 100% politics driven ridiculousness.“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”
The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape.
Yes, everyone knows by now this ridiculously partisan judge redefined rape so all you parrots could put it in every post for eternity. Again, 2 people know for sure what happened, anything else is 100% politics driven ridiculousness.
So you really believe that if a man inserts his fingers in a woman’s vagina without her permission, she wasn’t raped?
Well a judge and jury of his peers, in a court of justice, said he is a sexual abuser. Ill take their word for it after they heard and examined all evidence. Over the maga apologists on this board, who saw and heard nothing but Fox News clips. Justice has spoken. Trump is liable for sexual abuse.The fact is no one but DT and that batshit crazy woman know the truth.
If you believe he is, it's bc you want to, and if you don't, we'll it's probably some of the same.
Neither of them have reputations warranting blind trust, that's for certain.
Ugh it's not what I believe it's what the law had been forever. The jury said the same. These threads are pointless anyway, facts don't matter anymore to 90% of you.So you really believe that if a man inserts his fingers in a woman’s vagina without her permission, she wasn’t raped?
Good luck with that argument.
Ugh it's not what I believe it's what the law had been forever. The jury said the same. These threads are pointless anyway, facts don't matter anymore to 90% of you.
A. It was a civil trial. You should learn the difference.Well a judge and jury of his peers, in a court of justice, said he is a sexual abuser. Ill take their word for it after they heard and examined all evidence. Over the maga apologists on this board, who saw and heard nothing but Fox News clips. Justice has spoken. Trump is liable for sexual abuse.
Thinks rape is impossible to prove.Yes, everyone knows by now this ridiculously partisan judge redefined rape so all you parrots could put it in every post for eternity. Again, 2 people know for sure what happened, anything else is 100% politics driven ridiculousness.
Thinks the word of a mentally ill woman of an incident 30 years ago put forth in a civil trial should brand someone a rapist no matter the circumstances.Thinks rape is impossible to prove.
Also believes 2020 election was stolen with zero evidence.