ADVERTISEMENT

Is VandenBerg not being targeted enough this year?

paladinhawk

HB Legend
Feb 4, 2004
10,725
2,083
113
I don't want to see a return of the GDGD offensive scheme, but it seems to me that on 1st down they need to throwing some high completion rate passes, even if the passes are for very small gains. VandenBerg seems a little like the forgotten man at times
 
He had a drop early and Stanley made a terrible pass to him early. Just got off on the wrong foot. We need him too. He is a critical to make those short routes work for them.
 
Stanley threw a crossing route slightly behind VB, and VB missed it. It's a ball he usually catches, and that a quality receiver like him should catch. Just unfortunate.
 
The person who is not being targeted enough is Fant. I was at the game last night and Fant was working the PSU safety like a part time job and didn't get many looks. A couple wide open opportunities.
 
He was targeted 7 times last night. More than anyone else. Wadley was next with 4.

And PSU ran the same run play to the left 15 times. If it works, stick with it until the other team can stop it.

Fant was open more than 7 times; wide open at least 2x. He is going to be playing on Sundays and is 1 of our 2 biggest mismatches.
 
He dropped at least 2 last night that I remember. It was an odd night for our receivers. As much people are gonna blame BF, our receivers dropped some balls and Stanley was a little off on some of his throws. I dont think last night was a scheme issue, and I think BF is a substantial improvement over GD.
Execution def could have been better....but so could play calling. BF least impressive game imo....i had kind of expected the opposite :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HAWK
And PSU ran the same run play to the left 15 times. If it works, stick with it until the other team can stop it.

Fant was open more than 7 times; wide open at least 2x. He is going to be playing on Sundays and is 1 of our 2 biggest mismatches.
Fant's problem is he drops too many passes.
 
Iowa typically doesn't do any trick plays where a QB would be targeted and James Vandenberg hasn't been on the team for years, man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: L Lawliet
Easley is better than vandy and ISM is a lot faster. Vandy is 5th best target right now behind Easly, ISM, Fant, Hockensen.

Vandy has trouble getting open--PSU guys arm barred him and he was taken out of plays. I saw huge drop and a catch-able, but poorly thrown pass that was 50/50.
 
So far I'm not a huge fan of the 2 WR sets with Easley & Vandy. I really want ISM out there with either of the other 2 because ISM is a legit deep threat and could take the top off the D. I feel like Vandy & Easley are serving similar roles.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 24 so far
Easley is better than vandy and ISM is a lot faster. Vandy is 5th best target right now behind Easly, ISM, Fant, Hockensen.

Vandy has trouble getting open--PSU guys arm barred him and he was taken out of plays. I saw huge drop and a catch-able, but poorly thrown pass that was 50/50.
MVB has gotten open many times this year....he's also shown he can make great catches.
He had a couple bad drops last game but I'd still trust him as much/more than anyone else!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 24 so far
I don't want to see a return of the GDGD offensive scheme, but it seems to me that on 1st down they need to throwing some high completion rate passes, even if the passes are for very small gains. VandenBerg seems a little like the forgotten man at times

Easley and Wadley are seeming to click with Stanley as receivers. This is the way I see it going forward. ISM as well. No different than when JVB and CJB clicked.

The encouraging part going forward is we have receivers catching balls, and getting behind the secondary. Easley got behind them yesterday when PSU was clearly playing keep everything in front of them.

We also aren't afraid to throw on first down. Fine, the only issue as I see it is we are 100% run on 2nd down if we throw on first. I know factually we were 100% before last night, and I don't recall that changing.

The play calling? The pitch in the end zone was a head scratcher. But we used to run naked bootlegs out of the end zone as well. And they worked. Not all the time. When these plays don't work it's painfully obvious.

To me this is a combination of KOK and BF. I have no issue with it so far.

Last night was obvious KF football. Clearly PSU has enormous talent. They are a legit contender to make the CFP. That we were close is remarkable really.

Look, I like these young kids on the team. They're fun to watch. They have heart. Anyone who has followed Iowa football knows this isn't always the case. I don't know how many wins this translates to, but I like what I'm seeing.

We lose some critical pieces next year. But even there, it looks like we have serviceable replacements.

The sky is not falling. We have a pretty good group of guys. Better than many prior years. Hopefully the record will reflect this. But again, anyone that follows college football knows that isn't always the case. But we're nowhere near there yet. There is some serious improvement that needs to happen. But at least this year there is hope improvement is coming each and every week.
 
Stanley threw a crossing route slightly behind VB, and VB missed it. It's a ball he usually catches, and that a quality receiver like him should catch. Just unfortunate.
He also dropped one right in his hands earlier if I recall. I'm still not sure that MVB is 100%, but who knows.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT