ADVERTISEMENT

IowaLaw's Objective Mid-Season Report Card: Offense

We are already at the midpoint in the season! The Hawks sit at 4-2 with a pretty favorable schedule still ahead. It's been an up and down year, with Iowa looking as bad as they've ever looked last week followed by the best offensive performance in recent memory against a rebuilding Washington team. So how have the position groups performed when compared with expectations and the rest of the 18 team Big 10 conference?

1. QB: D-. Iowa sits at 17th of 18 Big 10 teams in passing offense. That's REAL bad. Cade McNamara, Jon Budmeyer's highest profile recruit and the Swarm's largest financial investment...sits at 16th in the conference in yards per game at just 132. Sadly, his yards per attempt ranks even worse (DEAD LAST among Big 10 QBs). The numbers are especially bad because several of Cade's 1 yard passes that Kirk himself could have completed were extended 20+ yards by virtue of having an all-American running back who can turn a 1 yard gain into a 20 yard gain. Even Cade's completion percentage on his exclusively short passes is near the bottom of the Big 10 at just 63%. By comparison, five QBs in the conference are well above 70%. QB play is the weakest link on the entire team and no one other than Kirk Ferentz would give Cade a better grade than D-.

2. RB: A+. Unexpectedly, the Hawkeyes rank #1 in the Big 10 in rushing offense. That's unheard of. Despite coming into the season as Iowa's 3rd string RB, Kaleb Johnson ranks #1 in the Big 10 in yards per game, yards per carry, and touchdowns! Pretty amazing considering all the RB talent out there. If the Hawks had simply blocked Iowa State's lucky 54 yrd field goal, Johnson would be on everyone's radar as a Heisman contender. And while second stringer Moulton isn't setting the world on fire, he ranks 4th among Big 10 freshmen in yards per game, so the future is bright at the position.

3. WR: F. Sadly, the running joke about Iowa's WR group being the worst in college football will now continue for a 6th consecutive year. Gone is undertalented & undersized 5 year starter Ragaini, and in comes a new crop of WR recruits no other Power 5 program wanted. Iowa's one playmaker, their 4 star WR OSU transfer Brown, found himself in Kirk's doghouse and bolted mid-season after only catching 1 ball all year. Iowa's #2 receiver, Anderson, has been hurt with a mysterious injury that has lingered for 2 years and has caught a grand total of 1 ball all season. Wetjen, the fastest and most dynamic player on the roster...1 catch all year. Many were high on Buie & Howard returning this year, yet they have a combined...3 catches. With so many recruiting misses, the Hawks are left using the WR talent pulled from the transfer portal last year. What's that you say? The only WR they went out and got was Northwestern's 6th team WR? Yup, and Gill, who couldn't see the field at lowly Northwestern, is Iowa's #1 receiver, averaging just 2.5 catches per game for 169 yards in 6 games. Where does that rank him compared with the rest of the Big 10's receivers? Hard to say because they only list the top 50, and Gill isn't even close to making the list. That means most teams have 3 WRs more productive than Iowa's #1 WR.

4. TE: C-. Tight End U. Who needs average wide receivers when Iowa has its TE NFL pipeline, right? With "all-American and likely 1st round draft pick Luke Lachey" healthy and playing every down, the Hawks will be in good shape. Or not. Halfway through the year and Lachey has just 156 yards, 0 touchdowns. Ostrenga has been a good backup, but he has just 63 receiving yards this year. By comparison, Penn State's TE has 40 catches for 525 yards an 4 touchdowns. Purdue's TE has 352 yards and 2 tds. Michigan's tight end has 30 catches. Washington, Oregon, and Rutgers all have TEs with over 20 catches and Michigan State's TE has over 240 yards. All are putting up better stats than any TE on Iowa's roster...despite all having a better WR room to share passes with. Hawk fans considered Lachey a lock for 1st team all-Big 10 and it's looking like he won't even make honorable mention.

5. OL: B-. The OL seems to be a tale of two skill sets. They can be road graders in the run game, but their pass protection is awful. Iowa has more starts on the OLine than any team in the country. Kirk touts himself as an OL guru. So why isn't Iowa's OL a strength this year? Despite not throwing much, the Hawks are 9th in sacks allowed (1.5 sacks per game). That number is deceptive, as Cade rarely steps back in the pocket to launch deep balls. Similarly, despite Johnson being an elite yards after contact back, Iowa ranks 8th in tackles for loss allowed. The worst part is...the cupboard looks to be bare next year with everyone other than Dunker graduating.

6. K: A. Drew Stevens is the most underrated weapon on the team. The guy gets zero hype, yet he's the Big 10's #2 rated kicker, nailing 10 of 11 field goals this year, many at long range. Sure, we all remember the misses, and his 1 miss against Ohio State was a dagger to the heart, but Stevens is an elite college kicker that deserves more praise than he gets.
Beau Stephens will be back next year also and some of the young ones are studs already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Old Uncle Teddy
1. Over the last three centuries, (maybe only the 2 centuries) Iowa's record against tOSU is 15-68-3. You think that's a Kirk problem? It's great when we beat them because it literally only happens 3 or 4 times in any Hawkeye fan's life.

2. Iowa has doubled its offensive yards. Lost one close game by a last second field goal. Got pounded at Columbus, but Iowa almost always gets pounded at Columbus. Maybe that's what to expect after more than a century. Maybe those inherent benefits Ohio has over Iowa are meaningful. Brutus has a $20M football NIL. That is far more than Iowa has for all sports, I think.

3. Iowa has the easier part of the schedule ahead. Assuming that comes with better offensive stats. We already play on a lot of shorter fields, limiting the total yardage. The best team left is Nebraska. To be honest Nebraska hasn't had much success at Iowa lately.

We are still able to win out, indeed likely to do so. So, the playoffs are still an option. Iowa has doubled offensive production, and more than doubled scoring with a 1st year OC and everyone learning a very different new offense.

But never let reality sink the unrealistic expectations and perpetual complaining, right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BirdistheWord
They’re also not running traditional pro style offense. Flexbone triple option. Kirks not switching from what he wants to run, good, bad or indifferent.
No, I am just saying, remember how Brian basically said there was no reason to get better on offense because we were winning with just defense? The same stands true with running the ball. I mean if we can just ram it down their throats, there is no reason not to. BUT I do not think they are taking the approach of we don't need to throw, because Cade said today, "we have been running that play for 2 months now and just waiting for the right time". Plus our OC is a former QB. Well they are better at it now after 2 months then they were back then. Coaches know that. They see that. Like I said once, for years Iowa fans have been saying, we need to pass to open up the run and Lester is saying no, we need to run to open up the pass. It's working. Granted not so good against OSU, but jeez give it a min or two. Unless we make the playoffs, I really can not see us not rolling in a bowl game. I mean do you honestly think if we played ISU again tomorrow, we would not stomp a mud hole in their arse????? I mean what team out there that is not in the playoff discussion do you think can go toe to toe with us? (finish strong Hawks and that is exactly what the powers that be will be looking at). We are getting better at a very high rate. NOW we just need to continue that. Welcome to the meat of the schedule. The grind. Where the wheat is separated from the chaff. As Doc Holiday said to Ringo when Ringo said "I was just foolin about" Doc says. "I wasn't"
 
Last edited:
No, I am just saying, remember how Brian basically said there was no reason to get better on offense because we were winning with just defense? The same stands true with running the ball. I mean if we can just ram it down their throats, there is no reason not to. BUT I do not think they are taking the approach of we don't need to throw, because Cade said today, "we have been running that play for 2 months now and just waiting for the right time". Plus our OC is a former QB. Well they are better at it now after 2 months then they were back then. Coaches know that. They see that. Like I said once, for years Iowa fans have been saying, we need to pass to open up the run and Lester is saying no, we need to run to open up the pass. It's working. Granted not so good against OSU, but jeez give it a min or two. Unless we make the playoffs, I really can not see us not rolling in a bowl game. I mean do you honestly think if we played ISU again tomorrow, we would not stomp a mud hole in their arse????? I mean what team out there that is not in the playoff discussion do you think can go toe to toe with us? (finish strong Hawks and that is exactly what the powers that be will be looking at). We are getting better at a very high rate. NOW we just need to continue that. Welcome to the meat of the schedule. The grind. Where the wheat is separated from the chaff. As Doc Holiday said to Ringo when Ringo said "I was just foolin about" Doc says. "I wasn't"
Damn dude give me some of what you’re smoking! We are getting better at a high rate? We’ve won 1 in a row! Against a 500 team. While I’m a big Lester fan already let’s calm down a bit.
 
Damn dude give me some of what you’re smoking! We are getting better at a high rate? We’ve won 1 in a row! Against a 500 team. While I’m a big Lester fan already let’s calm down a bit.
Its Hawkeye Heroin. Ohio State is not a realistic comparison. Oregon even less so, since they have an unlimited NIL and facilities budget, while OSU might have some limits those limits are fantastically high.
 
TE: Iowa does not have a regular means by which they can get these guys the ball in position to make big plays. They can’t block for a QB that can’t make all the throws
@Dr. Phil Seuss - the OL and QB play were worse even last year, yet Iowa didn't seem to have a problem getting the ball to the TEs. At some point, especially if a TE like Lachey has NFL aspirations, the TE needs to get separation and make plays or stand out as an elite blocker. Luke hasn't done either.

@Rambler Hawk - good point on Washington. Iowa has zero depth at WR (especially now that the best WR on the team quit). Instead, it has endless depth at RB. It makes no sense to switch Washington back from WR to RB just so that he can get two garbage carries at the end of games. Those are two less carries for someone like Patterson or Moulton who barely touch the ball as it is.

@Bulldogs1974 - you can absolutely have an A+ running back with a B- Offensive Line. That IS how football works, watch a game sometime. If it weren't it would be inexplicable how Kaleb Johnson averages 8 yards per carry going up against fresh defenses/all the starters, while both Moulton and Patterson average just 4 yards per carry, often times getting 4th quarter carries against backups. If the OL were judged solely on Moulton & Patterson's production...as well as the atrocious pass protection, how good would they look?

@IowaHawk1994 - Iowa's roster next year is going to be completely different. That doesn't mean they'll be horrible. Some schools have coaches who embrace the transfer portal and turn over their rosters each year. Hopefully this new offensive coordinator is a better portal recruiter than Brian & Budmeyer and will be able to lure some offensive talent to the roster.

@DEMGR - it's hard to fault the WRs for being unable to get separation. There is a reason Iowa was the only Power 5 offer for virtually all of them. At a position like WR, the highly rated kids out of high school are far more likely to be stars in college. Iowa needs to drastically improve its WR recruiting before we see any separation.

@BirdistheWord - you are saying last year's generationally bad WRs were worse than this year's? I'm not so sure about that. Was Brown (last year's best) better than Gill (this year's best)? Yes. Was Ragaini (last year's 2nd best & a 6th year senior) better than RVC (this year's 2nd best & a true freshmen)? Yes. Both WR groups were historically terrible, but I'd say this years is no better than last year. We just have a different offensive coordinator this year.
 
Last edited:
@Dr. Phil Seuss - the OL and QB play were worse last year and Iowa didn't have a problem getting the ball to the TEs. At some point, especially if a TE has NFL aspirations, the TE needs to get separation and make plays.

@Rambler Hawk - good point on Washington. Iowa has zero depth at WR (especially now that the best WR on the team quit) and endless depth at RB. It makes no sense that they would switch Washington back from WR to RB to get two garbage carries at the end of games. Those are two less carries for someone like Patterson or Moulton who barely touch the ball as it is.

@Bulldogs1974 - you can absolutely have an A+ running back with a B- Offensive Line. That IS how football works, watch a game sometime. If it weren't it would be inexplicable how Kaleb Johnson averages 8 yards per carry going up against fresh defenses/all the starters, while both Moulton and Patterson average just 4 yards per carry, often times getting 4th quarter carries against backups. If the OL were judged solely on Moulton & Patterson's production...as well as the atrocious pass protection, how good would they look?

@IowaHawk1994 - Iowa's roster next year is going to be completely different. That doesn't mean they'll be horrible. Some schools have coaches who embrace the transfer portal and turn over their rosters each year. Hopefully this new offensive coordinator is a better portal recruiter than Brian & Budmeyer and will be able to lure some offensive talent to the roster.

@DEMGR - it's hard to fault the WRs for being unable to get separation. There is a reason Iowa was the only Power 5 offer for virtually all of them. At a position like WR, the highly rated kids out of high school are far more likely to be stars in college. Iowa needs to drastically improve its WR recruiting before we see any separation.

@BirdistheWord - you are saying last year's generationally bad WRs were worse than this year's? I'm not so sure about that. Was Brown (last year's best) better than Gill (this year's best)? Yes. Was Ragaini (last year's 2nd best & a 6th year senior) better than RVC (this year's 2nd best & a true freshmen)? Yes. Both WR groups were historically terrible, but I'd say this years is no better than last year. We just have a different offensive coordinator this year.
d7acbc1e-8c95-491c-ad74-ecfc20c6bc1d_text.gif
 
@Dr. Phil Seuss - the OL and QB play were worse even last year, yet Iowa didn't seem to have a problem getting the ball to the TEs. At some point, especially if a TE like Lachey has NFL aspirations, the TE needs to get separation and make plays or stand out as an elite blocker. Luke hasn't done either.

@Rambler Hawk - good point on Washington. Iowa has zero depth at WR (especially now that the best WR on the team quit). Instead, it has endless depth at RB. It makes no sense to switch Washington back from WR to RB just so that he can get two garbage carries at the end of games. Those are two less carries for someone like Patterson or Moulton who barely touch the ball as it is.

@Bulldogs1974 - you can absolutely have an A+ running back with a B- Offensive Line. That IS how football works, watch a game sometime. If it weren't it would be inexplicable how Kaleb Johnson averages 8 yards per carry going up against fresh defenses/all the starters, while both Moulton and Patterson average just 4 yards per carry, often times getting 4th quarter carries against backups. If the OL were judged solely on Moulton & Patterson's production...as well as the atrocious pass protection, how good would they look?

@IowaHawk1994 - Iowa's roster next year is going to be completely different. That doesn't mean they'll be horrible. Some schools have coaches who embrace the transfer portal and turn over their rosters each year. Hopefully this new offensive coordinator is a better portal recruiter than Brian & Budmeyer and will be able to lure some offensive talent to the roster.

@DEMGR - it's hard to fault the WRs for being unable to get separation. There is a reason Iowa was the only Power 5 offer for virtually all of them. At a position like WR, the highly rated kids out of high school are far more likely to be stars in college. Iowa needs to drastically improve its WR recruiting before we see any separation.

@BirdistheWord - you are saying last year's generationally bad WRs were worse than this year's? I'm not so sure about that. Was Brown (last year's best) better than Gill (this year's best)? Yes. Was Ragaini (last year's 2nd best & a 6th year senior) better than RVC (this year's 2nd best & a true freshmen)? Yes. Both WR groups were historically terrible, but I'd say this years is no better than last year. We just have a different offensive coordinator this year.

Its hard to compare the two groups in isolation, as having a competent OC helps a ton, plus a QB who is not chained to the turf.

With that said…thru 6 games, here are the stats:

2023
WR catches: 20

2024
WR catches: 35

TE were utilized more last year. And I was a big fan of K Brown, but he did not really get going until 2nd half of season. Removing him this year does hurt, but…

We have more depth, it’s clear cut. No Alec Wick on depth chart. Yeah guys like Buie and Howard are raw but could be very good in the future. Gill has been excellent right out of the gate, fairly consistent. RVZ has been up and down but has a lot more upside than Ragaini. Even Wetjen getting slightly utilized helps.

In the end, on paper it’s marginally better given Brown was not a factor yet. But you can’t argue with 35 vs 20 catches.
 
Its hard to compare the two groups in isolation, as having a competent OC helps a ton, plus a QB who is not chained to the turf.

With that said…thru 6 games, here are the stats:

2023
WR catches: 20

2024
WR catches: 35

TE were utilized more last year. And I was a big fan of K Brown, but he did not really get going until 2nd half of season. Removing him this year does hurt, but…

We have more depth, it’s clear cut. No Alec Wick on depth chart. Yeah guys like Buie and Howard are raw but could be very good in the future. Gill has been excellent right out of the gate, fairly consistent. RVZ has been up and down but has a lot more upside than Ragaini. Even Wetjen getting slightly utilized helps.

In the end, on paper it’s marginally better given Brown was not a factor yet. But you can’t argue with 35 vs 20 catches.
Bird has the Word. THE OFFENSE HAS JUMPED 60 TEAMS AND HAS THE EASIER HALF OF THE SEASON LEFT. Why constantly look for things to bitch about? Iowa is massively improved on offense. What's wrong with just enjoying the improvement. The Clown game was kind of kick in the nuts, the OSU thing was typical in the 102 years since Iowa's first game against tOSU. Going from 130s and facing the real possibility of finishing in the 50s is the improvement I assume people wanted to see. The line play has improved substantially. We have a Heisman finalist as our primary weapon, cannot say that often. We just piss pounded one of the Pac intermeddlers and we piss pounded the Goophers, a Big Ten team with a winning record and on the road. Not only are there more passing yards but closing in on the full 14 game total. Went from scoring 13 PPG to 29.9. That is fast improvement with a new OC and a previously bottom feeder offense. BE HAPPY WITH THE VAST IMPROVEMENT INSTEAD OF THE PISSING AND MOANING.

Is Kaleb Brown such a loss? Barely saw the field, and never looked good when he was on the field. He sounds very dumb when he talks. Maybe the kid just isn't smart enough to learn WR skills of plays.
 
1. Over the last three centuries, (maybe only the 2 centuries) Iowa's record against tOSU is 15-68-3. You think that's a Kirk problem? It's great when we beat them because it literally only happens 3 or 4 times in any Hawkeye fan's life.

2. Iowa has doubled its offensive yards. Lost one close game by a last second field goal. Got pounded at Columbus, but Iowa almost always gets pounded at Columbus. Maybe that's what to expect after more than a century. Maybe those inherent benefits Ohio has over Iowa are meaningful. Brutus has a $20M football NIL. That is far more than Iowa has for all sports, I think.

3. Iowa has the easier part of the schedule ahead. Assuming that comes with better offensive stats. We already play on a lot of shorter fields, limiting the total yardage. The best team left is Nebraska. To be honest Nebraska hasn't had much success at Iowa lately.

We are still able to win out, indeed likely to do so. So, the playoffs are still an option. Iowa has doubled offensive production, and more than doubled scoring with a 1st year OC and everyone learning a very different new offense.

But never let reality sink the unrealistic expectations and perpetual complaining, right.
Nebraska is not the best team left.
 
Iowa should maintain a 7 -5 or at best 8 - 4 record moving forward based on our lack of NIL support by the fan base. You get what you pay for.
Iowa doesn't have access to the kind of NIL numbers that both the Blue Bloods and the larger states. We don't have many billionaires or corps with billions of institutional donors with billions of dollars to spend on promotions.

I have been saying for years that many institutional structures make it nearly impossible for Iowa to accumulate talent (including coaches) and raise money. Every change in the last 25 hurts small schools like Iowa. We aren't going to perform well once Kirk Ferentz is gone.
 
Bird has the Word. THE OFFENSE HAS JUMPED 60 TEAMS AND HAS THE EASIER HALF OF THE SEASON LEFT. Why constantly look for things to bitch about? Iowa is massively improved on offense. What's wrong with just enjoying the improvement. The Clown game was kind of kick in the nuts, the OSU thing was typical in the 102 years since Iowa's first game against tOSU. Going from 130s and facing the real possibility of finishing in the 50s is the improvement I assume people wanted to see. The line play has improved substantially. We have a Heisman finalist as our primary weapon, cannot say that often. We just piss pounded one of the Pac intermeddlers and we piss pounded the Goophers, a Big Ten team with a winning record and on the road. Not only are there more passing yards but closing in on the full 14 game total. Went from scoring 13 PPG to 29.9. That is fast improvement with a new OC and a previously bottom feeder offense. BE HAPPY WITH THE VAST IMPROVEMENT INSTEAD OF THE PISSING AND MOANING.

Is Kaleb Brown such a loss? Barely saw the field, and never looked good when he was on the field. He sounds very dumb when he talks. Maybe the kid just isn't smart enough to learn WR skills of plays.
WTF are you talking about Teddy? I was responding to the OP. I was the one who said our WR play is better vs last year.
 
Iowa doesn't have access to the kind of NIL numbers that both the Blue Bloods and the larger states. We don't have many billionaires or corps with billions of institutional donors with billions of dollars to spend on promotions.

I have been saying for years that many institutional structures make it nearly impossible for Iowa to accumulate talent (including coaches) and raise money. Every change in the last 25 hurts small schools like Iowa. We aren't going to perform well once Kirk Ferentz is gone.
How did Nebraska a state smaller than Iowa get all that NIL money?
 

Well Alabama won back to back National Championships in 1978 and 1979 averaging fewer passing yards per game.

No, 4-2 is my grade for Iowa's offense on its mid-season report card
This is next-level stupid and exactly the mindset Kirk has banked on to fleece the university out of millions of dollars for 25 years and counting.

@eyesofhawk is already getting hard at the prospect of typing “5-3” next Saturday after Iowa grinds out an impressive 17-13 win against Northwestern.

@StillGold will offer next week’s history lesson by providing Yale’s average points per game during their run of 27 national championships from 1872-1927.

@curtisj157, this is precisely why Swarm is and should be losing supporters. No Iowa fan should pay a dime for this level of grifting. More fans need to follow your lead and start voting by closing their wallets. This needs to include game tickets. There are plenty of places where tailgating is free if people feel the need.
 
WTF are you talking about Teddy? I was responding to the OP. I was the one who said our WR play is better vs last year.
I was unclear. Sorry. That first underlined sentence was intended to mean you "have the word" as in as in you are right and I agree. My cannons were aimed at the continuous complainers. I write a lot late at night and edit less often.
 
This is next-level stupid and exactly the mindset Kirk has banked on to fleece the university out of millions of dollars for 25 years and counting.

@eyesofhawk is already getting hard at the prospect of typing “5-3” next Saturday after Iowa grinds out an impressive 17-13 win against Northwestern.

@StillGold will offer next week’s history lesson by providing Yale’s average points per game during their run of 27 national championships from 1872-1927.

@curtisj157, this is precisely why Swarm is and should be losing supporters. No Iowa fan should pay a dime for this level of grifting. More fans need to follow your lead and start voting by closing their wallets. This needs to include game tickets. There are plenty of places where tailgating is free if people feel the need.
Grading an offense by its record is next level stupid?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 83Hawk
Damn dude give me some of what you’re smoking! We are getting better at a high rate? We’ve won 1 in a row! Against a 500 team. While I’m a big Lester fan already let’s calm down a bit.
Going by W/L's is not a good way to compare, especially when it is obvious our defense is the worst it has been in years. On offense we are doing better and it is easy to see, especially given how long the whole team had to work on the install together. The lack of a passing game is what is holding us back now. It is obvious we do not have a QB on the roster that Lester trusts to throw it plus 20 yards and that is concerning. But the one who gives us the best chance to win can not even hit the less then 20 throws with any sort of dependability either, so it is understandable why we do not attempt anything long, when we struggle with the short throws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rambler Hawk
Going by W/L's is not a good way to compare, especially when it is obvious our defense is the worst it has been in years. On offense we are doing better and it is easy to see, especially given how long the whole team had to work on the install together. The lack of a passing game is what is holding us back now. It is obvious we do not have a QB on the roster that Lester trusts to throw it plus 20 yards and that is concerning. But the one who gives us the best chance to win can not even hit the less then 20 throws with any sort of dependability either, so it is understandable why we do not attempt anything long, when we struggle with the short throws.
You’re right. Going by W/L’s is not a good way to compare. Just plain watching our QB is enough for me.
 
Sorry. I was a bit harsh.
We're cool. You'll notice I edit my posts frequently. I have an eye infection that's more or less permanent. Late at night my eyes get tired and start to blink more, which irritates the eyes, which then start to water profusely. Compromised immune system and 65 rough years under my belt.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT