Maybe I didn't phrase that properly. Yes, UNI deserved to win the game. But as I stated, ISU should have won it, based on the position late in the fourth quarter. They had the lead, the momentum, and a first down on UNI's side of the field. AT THAT POINT, they shouldn't have lost the game.
Based on the stats, etc., UNI should not have been behind then. But it was.
I also expect ISU to play better in the future, including next week. They have some good skill position players. Lanning made some really brain-dead errors, but he also threw some excellent passes. The receivers looked as good as expected. The running backs, when they got the chance, showed up well. The DBs were expected to be the strongest part of the team, and did nothing to alter that perception.
The defense suffered last night when they lost a veteran linebacker -- a lot of freshmen were playing. Bailey is a very good scrambling quarterback.
Some of the mistakes unquestionably were due to the fact that it was the first game for a new staff and for 41 players. But some of the veterans made inexcusable errors, too.
I can't see them winning Saturday unless Iowa plays the way ISU played last night, which isn't going to happen. Cyclones could be respectable, (IMHO, which is truly H in this case) if they accentuate the passing game, but quite honestly, at this point I think Iowa will cover the spread.....and I don't even know what the spread will be.